Abstract
The current study evaluated at how calcium chloride and storage conditions affect grape postharvest quality. The study was conducted using a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with nine treatments and three replications. All treatments were evaluated in terms of grape physical and shelf-life qualities. The study found that 2% CaCl2 in a cool bot held at 85±5% RH and 8±1 °C temperature greatly affects grape shelf-life. On the 24th day of storage, the least physiological weight loss (3.34%), fruit length (17.34 mm), fruit diameter (16.62), and firmness (0.70 kg/cm2) were seen in 2% CaCl2 in a cool bot, which indicated a significant difference, followed by 4% CaCl2. Grapes stored at ambient conditions, treated or untreated, were only barely affected by all treatments, leading in gradual deterioration and weight loss, followed by zero energy. Thus, the study\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s findings indicated that 2% CaCl2 might be an edible salt for minimizing grape postharvest losses in a cool bot.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Calcium chloride with cool-bot storage greatly affects grape shelf life.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
t0“shelf life of grapes (Vitis Vinifera)”
e1“The study found that 2% CaCl2 in a cool bot held at 85±5% RH and 8±1 °C temperature greatly affects grape shelf-life”
Claim · model-written summary
At day 24 2% CaCl2 in a cool bot gave the least physiological weight loss (3.34%).
Verbatim
t0“shelf life of grapes (Vitis Vinifera)”
e2“On the 24th day of storage, the least physiological weight loss (3.34%), fruit length (17.34 mm), fruit diameter (16.62), and firmness (0.70 kg/cm2) were seen in 2% CaCl2 in a cool bot, which indicated a significant difference, followed by 4% CaCl2”
Claim · model-written summary
At day 24 2% CaCl2 in a cool bot gave the least fruit length (17.34 mm).
Verbatim
t0“shelf life of grapes (Vitis Vinifera)”
e2“On the 24th day of storage, the least physiological weight loss (3.34%), fruit length (17.34 mm), fruit diameter (16.62), and firmness (0.70 kg/cm2) were seen in 2% CaCl2 in a cool bot, which indicated a significant difference, followed by 4% CaCl2”
Claim · model-written summary
At day 24 2% CaCl2 in a cool bot gave the least fruit diameter (16.62).
Verbatim
t0“shelf life of grapes (Vitis Vinifera)”
e2“On the 24th day of storage, the least physiological weight loss (3.34%), fruit length (17.34 mm), fruit diameter (16.62), and firmness (0.70 kg/cm2) were seen in 2% CaCl2 in a cool bot, which indicated a significant difference, followed by 4% CaCl2”
Claim · model-written summary
At day 24 2% CaCl2 in a cool bot gave the least firmness (0.70 kg/cm2).
Verbatim
t0“shelf life of grapes (Vitis Vinifera)”
e2“On the 24th day of storage, the least physiological weight loss (3.34%), fruit length (17.34 mm), fruit diameter (16.62), and firmness (0.70 kg/cm2) were seen in 2% CaCl2 in a cool bot, which indicated a significant difference, followed by 4% CaCl2”
Claim · model-written summary
Grapes stored at ambient conditions were barely affected by the treatments.
Verbatim
t0“shelf life of grapes (Vitis Vinifera)”
e3“Grapes stored at ambient conditions, treated or untreated, were only barely affected by all treatments, leading in gradual deterioration and weight loss”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest 2% CaCl2 may help minimize grape postharvest losses in a cool bot.
Verbatim
t0“shelf life of grapes (Vitis Vinifera)”
e4“2% CaCl2 might be an edible salt for minimizing grape postharvest losses in a cool bot”
The same questions in other papers
calcium chloride dihydrate · quality: postharvest · VitisResults differ
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.