Paper · 2007 · Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment

Response of Gliricidia sepium to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus inoculation and P fertilization in sterile and non-sterile soils

Iniobong E. Okon; O. Osonubi; M. G. Solomon

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF), Glomus deserticola, on the growth of Gliricidia sepium under P 0, 50 and 100 mg kg -1 levels of phosphorus fertilization. Inoculation with AMF increased dry matter yield at all levels of applied phosphorus in both sterile and non-sterile soils while P fertilization at 100 mg kg -1 soil level in conjunction with AMF inoculation increased the dry matter yield by 269.2 and 107.7% in sterile and non-sterile soils respectively. P fertilization increased arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonization but decreased mycorrhizal dependency. Colonization by indigenous AMF was, however, significantly (p<0.01) reduced at P 100 mg kg -1 soil fertilization. Foliar N, P and K yields were significantly (p<0.01) increased by AMF inoculation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased dry matter yield at all P levels in sterile and non-sterile soils.

Taxon
Gliricidia sepiumGliricidia sepiumt0
Treatment
Inoculation with AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at all levels of applied phosphorus in both sterile and non-sterile soilse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gliricidia sepium
Gliricidia sepium · TaxonAtamari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Gliricidia sepium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–29 · show in text ↑
e0

“Inoculation with AMF increased dry matter yield at all levels of applied phosphorus in both sterile and non-sterile soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 100 mg kg -1 P and AMF increased dry matter yield 269.2% in sterile soil.

Taxon
Gliricidia sepiumGliricidia sepiumt0
Treatment
P fertilization at 100 mg kg -1 soil level in conjunction with AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
269.2e0
Qualifier
sterilee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gliricidia sepium
Gliricidia sepium · TaxonAtamari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Gliricidia sepium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–29 · show in text ↑
e0

“P fertilization at 100 mg kg -1 soil level in conjunction with AMF inoculation increased the dry matter yield by 269.2 and 107.7% in sterile and non-sterile soils respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 100 mg kg -1 P and AMF increased dry matter yield 107.7% in non-sterile soil.

Taxon
Gliricidia sepiumGliricidia sepiumt0
Treatment
P fertilization at 100 mg kg -1 soil level in conjunction with AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
107.7%e0
Qualifier
non-sterile soilse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gliricidia sepium
Gliricidia sepium · TaxonAtamari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Gliricidia sepium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–29 · show in text ↑
e0

“P fertilization at 100 mg kg -1 soil level in conjunction with AMF inoculation increased the dry matter yield by 269.2 and 107.7% in sterile and non-sterile soils respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P fertilization increased AMF colonization.

Taxon
Gliricidia sepiumGliricidia sepiumt0
Treatment
P fertilizatione0
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonizatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gliricidia sepium
Gliricidia sepium · TaxonAtamari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Gliricidia sepium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–29 · show in text ↑
e0

“P fertilization increased arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P fertilization decreased mycorrhizal dependency.

Taxon
Gliricidia sepiumGliricidia sepiumt0
Treatment
P fertilizatione0
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
mycorrhizal dependencye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gliricidia sepium
Gliricidia sepium · TaxonAtamari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Gliricidia sepium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–29 · show in text ↑
e0

“P fertilization increased arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonization but decreased mycorrhizal dependency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–629 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 100 mg kg -1 P, indigenous AMF colonization was significantly reduced.

Taxon
Gliricidia sepiumGliricidia sepiumt0
Treatment
P 100 mg kg -1 soil fertilizatione0
Interactor
indigenous AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
Colonization by indigenous AMFe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gliricidia sepium
Gliricidia sepium · TaxonAtamari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Gliricidia sepium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–29 · show in text ↑
e0

“Colonization by indigenous AMF was, however, significantly (p<0.01) reduced at P 100 mg kg -1 soil fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–743 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation significantly increased foliar N, P and K yields.

Taxon
Gliricidia sepiumGliricidia sepiumt0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
Foliar N, P and K yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gliricidia sepium
Gliricidia sepium · TaxonAtamari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Gliricidia sepium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–29 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar N, P and K yields were significantly (p<0.01) increased by AMF inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–826 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · yield · Gliricidia sepiumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · yield · Gliricidia sepiumResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.