Paper · 2004 · Tropical Agriculture

Growth and yield of maize and cassava cultivars as affected by mycorrhizal inoculation and alley cropping regime. (162)

Abiodun Olusola Salami; O. Osonubi

14
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Effect of mycorrhizal inoculation and two pruning regimes in experimental alley cropping treatments on the leaf biomass and nutrient yield of sole and mixed Gliricidia sepium (a nodulating plant) and Senna siamea (a non-nodulating plant) were investigated both in the greenhouse and in the field. The impact of the mixtures of these legumes as hedgerows on maize and one cultivar of cassava was also studied in the field. Gliricidia sepium prunnings were found to have high nutrient yields, notably 358.4 kg ha-1 of N and 14.7 kg ha-1 of P as well as fast decomposition and nutrient release. In both Gliricidia and Senna, there were similar leaf dry matter values in sole and mixed inoculated or non-inoculated trees for either of the pruning regime and for most of the pruning harvests, although significant differences occurred between inoculated and non-inoculated mixed or sole trees. There was no difference between the total leaf dry matter of the 2- and 3-month pruning regimes in G. sepium. However, in contrast to G. sepium, the total leaf dry matter of the 2-month pruning regime of S. siamea was lower than its 3-month pruning regime, except for sole non-inoculated trees. Generally, inoculation and mixing of trees in the same hedgerows significantly increased the total N and P yield in G. sepium and S. siamea with greater values in the former than the latter. In G. sepium and except for mixed inoculated trees, while total N yield in the leaf was higher in 3-monthly pruned than 2-monthly pruned trees, the converse was the case for P. For S. siamea, the total N and P yields were higher in 3-monthly than 2-monthly pruned trees. Mycorrhizal inoculations consistently increased the yield of the cassava root tuber and maize grain over their non-inoculated counterparts.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gliricidia sepium prunings had high nutrient yield of 358.4 kg ha-1 of N

Taxon
Gliricidia sepiumGliricidia sepiume0
Organ / stage
prunningse0
Outcome
nutrient yieldse0
Value
358.4 kg ha-1 of Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gliricidia sepium
Gliricidia sepium · TaxonAtamari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gliricidia sepium prunnings were found to have high nutrient yields, notably 358.4 kg ha-1 of N and 14.7 kg ha-1 of P as well as fast decomposition and nutrient release”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–590 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gliricidia sepium prunings had high nutrient yield of 14.7 kg ha-1 of P

Taxon
Gliricidia sepiumGliricidia sepiume0
Organ / stage
prunningse0
Outcome
nutrient yieldse0
Value
14.7 kg ha-1 of Pe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gliricidia sepium
Gliricidia sepium · TaxonAtamari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gliricidia sepium prunnings were found to have high nutrient yields, notably 358.4 kg ha-1 of N and 14.7 kg ha-1 of P as well as fast decomposition and nutrient release”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–590 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gliricidia sepium prunings showed fast decomposition and nutrient release

Taxon
Gliricidia sepiumGliricidia sepiume0
Organ / stage
prunningse0
Outcome
decomposition and nutrient releasee0
Qualifier
faste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gliricidia sepium
Gliricidia sepium · TaxonAtamari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gliricidia sepium prunnings were found to have high nutrient yields, notably 358.4 kg ha-1 of N and 14.7 kg ha-1 of P as well as fast decomposition and nutrient release”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–590 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total leaf dry matter of Gliricidia sepium did not differ between 2- and 3-month pruning regimes

Taxon
G. sepiumGliricidia sepiume0
Outcome
total leaf dry mattere0
Qualifier
2- and 3-month pruning regimese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gliricidia sepium
Gliricidia sepium · TaxonAtamari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no difference between the total leaf dry matter of the 2- and 3-month pruning regimes in G. sepium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–997 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total leaf dry matter of Senna siamea was lower under the 2-month pruning regime than under the 3-month pruning regime, except for sole non-inoculated trees

Taxon
S. siameaSenna siameae0
Treatment
2-month pruning regimee0
Outcome
total leaf dry mattere0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
except for sole non-inoculated treese0
Comparator
3-month pruning regimee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Senna siamea
Senna siamea · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total leaf dry matter of the 2-month pruning regime of S. siamea was lower than its 3-month pruning regime, except for sole non-inoculated trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation and mixing of trees in hedgerows significantly increased total N and P yield of Gliricidia sepium

Taxon
G. sepiumGliricidia sepiume0
Treatment
inoculation and mixing of treese0
Outcome
total N and P yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gliricidia sepium
Gliricidia sepium · TaxonAtamari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation and mixing of trees in the same hedgerows significantly increased the total N and P yield in G. sepium and S. siamea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1323 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation and mixing of trees in hedgerows significantly increased total N and P yield of Senna siamea

Taxon
S. siameaSenna siameae0
Treatment
inoculation and mixing of treese0
Outcome
total N and P yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Senna siamea
Senna siamea · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation and mixing of trees in the same hedgerows significantly increased the total N and P yield in G. sepium and S. siamea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1323 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total N yield in the leaf of Gliricidia sepium was higher under 3-monthly than 2-monthly pruning, except for mixed inoculated trees

Taxon
G. sepiumGliricidia sepiume0
Treatment
3-monthly prunede0
Outcome
total N yield in the leafe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
except for mixed inoculated treese0
Comparator
2-monthly prunede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gliricidia sepium
Gliricidia sepium · TaxonAtamari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In G. sepium and except for mixed inoculated trees, while total N yield in the leaf was higher in 3-monthly pruned than 2-monthly pruned trees, the converse was the case for P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total P yield in the leaf of Gliricidia sepium was lower under 3-monthly than 2-monthly pruning

Taxon
G. sepiumGliricidia sepiume0
Treatment
3-monthly prunede0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Comparator
2-monthly prunede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gliricidia sepium
Gliricidia sepium · TaxonAtamari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In G. sepium and except for mixed inoculated trees, while total N yield in the leaf was higher in 3-monthly pruned than 2-monthly pruned trees, the converse was the case for P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total N and P yields of Senna siamea were higher under 3-monthly than 2-monthly pruning

Taxon
S. siameaSenna siameae0
Treatment
3-monthlye0
Outcome
total N and P yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
2-monthly prunede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Senna siamea
Senna siamea · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For S. siamea, the total N and P yields were higher in 3-monthly than 2-monthly pruned trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation consistently increased maize grain yield over non-inoculated plants

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Mycorrhizal inoculationse0
Outcome
maize graine0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
consistentlye0
Comparator
non-inoculated counterpartse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal inoculations consistently increased the yield of the cassava root tuber and maize grain over their non-inoculated counterparts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1646–1784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation consistently increased cassava root tuber yield over non-inoculated plants

Treatment
Mycorrhizal inoculationse0
Outcome
root tubere0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
consistentlye0
Comparator
non-inoculated counterpartse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal inoculations consistently increased the yield of the cassava root tuber and maize grain over their non-inoculated counterparts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1646–1784 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated and non-inoculated mixed or sole Gliricidia sepium trees differed significantly in leaf biomass

Taxon
Gliricidia sepiumGliricidia sepiume0
Outcome
leaf biomasse0
Qualifier
significant differencese1
Comparator
non-inoculatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gliricidia sepium
Gliricidia sepium · TaxonAtamari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the leaf biomass and nutrient yield of sole and mixed Gliricidia sepium (a nodulating plant) and Senna siamea (a non-nodulating plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–237 · show in text ↑
e1

“although significant differences occurred between inoculated and non-inoculated mixed or sole trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–887 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated and non-inoculated mixed or sole Senna siamea trees differed significantly in leaf biomass

Taxon
Senna siameaSenna siameae0
Outcome
leaf biomasse0
Qualifier
significant differencese1
Comparator
non-inoculatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Senna siamea
Senna siamea · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the leaf biomass and nutrient yield of sole and mixed Gliricidia sepium (a nodulating plant) and Senna siamea (a non-nodulating plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–237 · show in text ↑
e1

“although significant differences occurred between inoculated and non-inoculated mixed or sole trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–887 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

inoculation · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 34 positive, 6 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

inoculation · yield · Senna siameaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · yield · Gliricidia sepiumResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.