Paper · 2002

Alleviating Soil Physical Constraints for Sustainable Crop Production through Tillage, Soil Amendment and Crop Residue Management

V. K. Phogat; Seema Dahiya

14
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The alleviation of soil physical constraints limiting crop production is considered important to increase agricultural production and sustaining the productivity of soils. The results of several field experiments conducted during the last two and a half decades to identify soil physical constraints in the state of Haryana (India) and to generate different technologies for their management are discussed. The major soil physical constraints found to impair soil quality and hence reduce crop growth include high soil permeability, soil crusting, sub-surface mechanical impedance and soil hardening. Studies indicated that the compaction of highly permeable soils by six passes of 1,500 kg tractor driven iron roller reduced water and nutrient losses, increased moisture retention in the soil profile and reduced the irrigation requirements for crops. The yields of various crops were either increased or remained unaffected upon compaction. The application of farmyard manure (FYM) on seed lines at the rate of 4 t ha -1 as mulch reduced the adverse effect of surface soil crusting on crop establishment and increased the yields of pearl millet and cotton quite significantly. High sub-surface mechanical impedance was found to affect plant growth more in legumes than in cereals. In these soils, deep tillage was found to be very effective in reducing the bulk density in sub-soil, increasing infiltration rate and yield of wheat. Incorporation of sesbania as green manure and the application of FYM were found to be useful in reducing the nitrogen requirement and improving the soil physical conditions of soils that set hard upon wetting and are under rice-wheat cropping system. The yield of both the crops were found to be higher where crop residues were burnt in situ followed by residue incorporation with 25 per cent extra nitrogen.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compaction of highly permeable soils reduced water and nutrient losses in Haryana.

Taxon
cropse2
Treatment
compaction of highly permeable soils by six passes of 1,500 kg tractor driven iron rollere0
Outcome
water and nutrient lossese0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
state of Haryana (India)e7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the compaction of highly permeable soils by six passes of 1,500 kg tractor driven iron roller reduced water and nutrient losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–751 · show in text ↑
e2

“reduced the irrigation requirements for crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–851 · show in text ↑
e7

“in the state of Haryana (India)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compaction of highly permeable soils increased moisture retention in the soil profile.

Taxon
cropse2
Treatment
compaction of highly permeable soils by six passes of 1,500 kg tractor driven iron rollere0
Outcome
moisture retention in the soil profilee1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the compaction of highly permeable soils by six passes of 1,500 kg tractor driven iron roller reduced water and nutrient losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–751 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased moisture retention in the soil profile”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–801 · show in text ↑
e2

“reduced the irrigation requirements for crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compaction of highly permeable soils reduced irrigation requirements for crops.

Taxon
cropse2
Treatment
compaction of highly permeable soils by six passes of 1,500 kg tractor driven iron rollere0
Outcome
irrigation requirementse2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the compaction of highly permeable soils by six passes of 1,500 kg tractor driven iron roller reduced water and nutrient losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–751 · show in text ↑
e2

“reduced the irrigation requirements for crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compaction either increased or did not change yields of various crops.

Taxon
various cropse3
Treatment
compactione3
Outcome
yieldse3
Direction
either increased or remained unaffectede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“The yields of various crops were either increased or remained unaffected upon compaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure mulch at 4 t/ha reduced the adverse effect of surface soil crusting on crop establishment.

Taxon
crope4
Treatment
application of farmyard manure (FYM) on seed lines at the rate of 4 t ha -1 as mulche4
Outcome
adverse effect of surface soil crusting on crop establishmente4
Direction
reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e4

“The application of farmyard manure (FYM) on seed lines at the rate of 4 t ha -1 as mulch reduced the adverse effect of surface soil crusting on crop establishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure mulch increased pearl millet yield significantly.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse5
Treatment
application of farmyard manure (FYM) on seed lines at the rate of 4 t ha -1 as mulche4
Outcome
yieldse5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The application of farmyard manure (FYM) on seed lines at the rate of 4 t ha -1 as mulch reduced the adverse effect of surface soil crusting on crop establishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1105 · show in text ↑
e5

“increased the yields of pearl millet and cotton quite significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure mulch increased cotton yield significantly.

Treatment
application of farmyard manure (FYM) on seed lines at the rate of 4 t ha -1 as mulche4
Outcome
yieldse5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The application of farmyard manure (FYM) on seed lines at the rate of 4 t ha -1 as mulch reduced the adverse effect of surface soil crusting on crop establishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1105 · show in text ↑
e5

“increased the yields of pearl millet and cotton quite significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1177 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High sub-surface mechanical impedance affects plant growth more in legumes than in cereals.

Taxon
legumese6
Treatment
High sub-surface mechanical impedancee6
Outcome
plant growthe6
Direction
moree6
Comparator
cerealse6

Verbatim

e6

“High sub-surface mechanical impedance was found to affect plant growth more in legumes than in cereals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1281 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage reduced sub-soil bulk density in wheat fields.

Treatment
deep tillagee7
Outcome
bulk density in sub-soile7
Direction
reducinge7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“deep tillage was found to be very effective in reducing the bulk density in sub-soil, increasing infiltration rate and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage increased infiltration rate in wheat fields.

Treatment
deep tillagee7
Outcome
infiltration ratee7
Direction
increasinge7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“deep tillage was found to be very effective in reducing the bulk density in sub-soil, increasing infiltration rate and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage increased wheat yield.

Treatment
deep tillagee7
Outcome
yield of wheate7
Direction
increasinge7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“deep tillage was found to be very effective in reducing the bulk density in sub-soil, increasing infiltration rate and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesbania green manure and FYM reduced the nitrogen requirement of crops.

Taxon
cropse2
Treatment
Incorporation of sesbania as green manure and the application of FYMe3
Outcome
nitrogen requiremente3
Direction
reducinge3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“reduced the irrigation requirements for crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–851 · show in text ↑
e3

“Incorporation of sesbania as green manure and the application of FYM were found to be useful in reducing the nitrogen requirement and improving the soil physical conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1606 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesbania green manure and FYM improved soil physical conditions on hard-setting soils.

Taxon
cropse2
Treatment
Incorporation of sesbania as green manure and the application of FYMe3
Outcome
soil physical conditionse3
Direction
improvinge3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“reduced the irrigation requirements for crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–851 · show in text ↑
e3

“Incorporation of sesbania as green manure and the application of FYM were found to be useful in reducing the nitrogen requirement and improving the soil physical conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1606 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Burning residues in situ followed by incorporation with 25 per cent extra nitrogen gave higher yields of both crops.

Taxon
both the cropse3
Treatment
crop residues were burnt in situ followed by residue incorporation with 25 per cent extra nitrogene3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
highere3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“The yield of both the crops were found to be higher where crop residues were burnt in situ followed by residue incorporation with 25 per cent extra nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1841 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

mulching · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 59 positive, 4 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

tillage · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 118 positive, 24 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

138 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

259 papers: 249 positive, 10 negative or no effect

248 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

255 papers more in this group

See all 259 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.