Paper · 2013

Influence of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on The Growth of Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) Grown Under Water Stress Conditions

D. Prabhu; T. Shankar; S. Sankaralingam

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) is well known to increasing the shoot length of plant species by transfering the insoluble soil nutrients. Relative Water Content (RWC) was higher in all mycorrhizal infected plants than non-mycorrhizal plants (22%). Under water stress condition WAM1 (37%), WAM2 (41%), WAM3 (44%) and WAM4 (28%) recorded maximum level of RWC. The total soluble sugars in the leaves of all Green gram plant showed a decrease in mycorrhizal seedlings than water stressed mycorrhizal seedlings. The starch content was higher in seedling inoculated with mycorrhizal crops when compared to water stressed mycorrhizal crops. The effect of AM inoculation in the protein content showed a greater increase in mycorrhizal plants than in control seedlings and water stressed plants. At the same time, proline content had recorded very low values in AM inoculated seedlings. SDS PAGE study revealed that, there was a prominent protein expression pattern in AM infected soil samples compared to non-infected soil samples. In AAS analysis, the soil inoculated with AM fungi produced high level of calcium, ferrous and potassium content while compared to non AM inoculated soil sample.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal plants had higher relative water content than nonmycorrhizal plants.

Taxon
Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Treatment
mycorrhizal infectede0
Interactor
mycorrhizale0symbiont
Outcome
Relative Water Content (RWC)e0
Direction
highere0
Value
22%e0
Comparator
non-mycorrhizal plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative Water Content (RWC) was higher in all mycorrhizal infected plants than non-mycorrhizal plants (22%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–254 · show in text ↑
t0

“Influence of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on The Growth of Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) Grown Under Water Stress Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WAM1 reached 37% RWC under water stress.

Taxon
Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Material
WAM1e0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
RWCe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
37%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under water stress condition WAM1 (37%), WAM2 (41%), WAM3 (44%) and WAM4 (28%) recorded maximum level of RWC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–364 · show in text ↑
t0

“Influence of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on The Growth of Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) Grown Under Water Stress Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WAM2 reached 41% RWC under water stress.

Taxon
Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Material
WAM2e0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
RWCe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
41%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under water stress condition WAM1 (37%), WAM2 (41%), WAM3 (44%) and WAM4 (28%) recorded maximum level of RWC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–364 · show in text ↑
t0

“Influence of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on The Growth of Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) Grown Under Water Stress Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WAM3 reached 44% RWC under water stress.

Taxon
Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Material
WAM3e0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
RWCe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
44%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under water stress condition WAM1 (37%), WAM2 (41%), WAM3 (44%) and WAM4 (28%) recorded maximum level of RWC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–364 · show in text ↑
t0

“Influence of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on The Growth of Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) Grown Under Water Stress Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WAM4 reached 28% RWC under water stress.

Taxon
Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Material
WAM4e0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
RWCe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
28%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under water stress condition WAM1 (37%), WAM2 (41%), WAM3 (44%) and WAM4 (28%) recorded maximum level of RWC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–364 · show in text ↑
t0

“Influence of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on The Growth of Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) Grown Under Water Stress Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf soluble sugars decreased in mycorrhizal seedlings relative to water stressed mycorrhizal seedlings.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
total soluble sugarse0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
water stressed mycorrhizal seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total soluble sugars in the leaves of all Green gram plant showed a decrease in mycorrhizal seedlings than water stressed mycorrhizal seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–513 · show in text ↑
t0

“Influence of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on The Growth of Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) Grown Under Water Stress Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starch content was higher in mycorrhizal seedlings than water stressed mycorrhizal crops.

Taxon
Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Treatment
inoculated with mycorrhizal cropse0
Outcome
starch contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
water stressed mycorrhizal cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The starch content was higher in seedling inoculated with mycorrhizal crops when compared to water stressed mycorrhizal crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–640 · show in text ↑
t0

“Influence of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on The Growth of Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) Grown Under Water Stress Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM inoculation increased seedling protein content compared with controls and water stressed plants.

Taxon
Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Treatment
AM inoculatione0
Interactor
AMe0symbiont
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
greater increasee0
Comparator
control seedlings and water stressed plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of AM inoculation in the protein content showed a greater increase in mycorrhizal plants than in control seedlings and water stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“Influence of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on The Growth of Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) Grown Under Water Stress Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM inoculated seedlings had very low proline.

Taxon
Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Treatment
AM inoculatede0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
very lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“proline content had recorded very low values in AM inoculated seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–884 · show in text ↑
t0

“Influence of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on The Growth of Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) Grown Under Water Stress Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM infected soil showed a prominent protein expression pattern.

Taxon
Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Outcome
protein expression pattern in AM infected soil samplese0
Comparator
non-infected soil samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was a prominent protein expression pattern in AM infected soil samples compared to non-infected soil samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“Influence of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on The Growth of Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) Grown Under Water Stress Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM inoculated soil had high calcium, ferrous and potassium compared with noninoculated soil.

Taxon
Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Outcome
calcium, ferrous and potassium contente0
Direction
high levele0
Comparator
non AM inoculated soil samplee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soil inoculated with AM fungi produced high level of calcium, ferrous and potassium content while compared to non AM inoculated soil sample”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“Influence of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on The Growth of Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) Grown Under Water Stress Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑

inoculation · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

infection · physiology: water · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: water · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.