Paper · 2003

Reduced-risk pest management programs for North Carolina apples

J. F. Walgenbach; Charles L. Thayer

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An apple pest management program that relied heavily on reduced-risk pesticides and mating disruption was evaluated on approximately 800 acres in North Carolina over a three-year period from 2000 to 2002. Before initiation of the project, tufted apple bud moth, codling moth and oriental fruit moth were the primary insect pests of apples in this region. The use of insect growth regulators and mating disruption provided excellent control of lepidopterous pests, but insects that were sporadic or of minor importance under organophosphate-based systems increased in importance, including San Jose scale, Comstock mealybug, plum curculio, and apple maggot. The recent registrations of new insecticides (Esteem, Actara and Avaunt) have helped to solve these initial problems. However, the cost of alternative pest management programs was higher than conventional organophosphate-based programs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insect growth regulators and mating disruption gave excellent control of lepidopterous pests.

Treatment
insect growth regulators and mating disruptione0
Interactor
lepidopterous pestse0pest
Outcome
excellent control of lepidopterous pestse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of insect growth regulators and mating disruption provided excellent control of lepidopterous pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

San Jose scale increased in importance under the alternative program.

Taxon
San Jose scalee0
Outcome
importancee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
organophosphate-based systemse0

Verbatim

e0

“insects that were sporadic or of minor importance under organophosphate-based systems increased in importance, including San Jose scale, Comstock mealybug, plum curculio, and apple maggot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–656 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Comstock mealybug increased in importance under the alternative program.

Taxon
Comstock mealybuge0
Outcome
importancee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
organophosphate-based systemse0

Verbatim

e0

“insects that were sporadic or of minor importance under organophosphate-based systems increased in importance, including San Jose scale, Comstock mealybug, plum curculio, and apple maggot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–656 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plum curculio increased in importance under the alternative program.

Taxon
plum curculioConotrachelus nenuphare0
Outcome
importancee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
organophosphate-based systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Conotrachelus nenuphar
Conotrachelus nenuphar · TaxonClemson University · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“insects that were sporadic or of minor importance under organophosphate-based systems increased in importance, including San Jose scale, Comstock mealybug, plum curculio, and apple maggot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–656 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple maggot increased in importance under the alternative program.

Taxon
apple maggotRhagoletis pomonellae0
Outcome
importancee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
organophosphate-based systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhagoletis pomonella
Rhagoletis pomonella · TaxonJoseph Berger, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“insects that were sporadic or of minor importance under organophosphate-based systems increased in importance, including San Jose scale, Comstock mealybug, plum curculio, and apple maggot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–656 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

New insecticide registrations helped solve the initial pest problems.

Treatment
new insecticides (Esteem, Actara and Avaunt)e0
Outcome
helped to solve these initial problemse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The recent registrations of new insecticides (Esteem, Actara and Avaunt) have helped to solve these initial problems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative pest programs cost more than conventional organophosphate programs.

Outcome
cost of alternative pest management programse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conventional organophosphate-based programse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the cost of alternative pest management programs was higher than conventional organophosphate-based programs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–893 · show in text ↑

loss of function · pest · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.