Paper · 2014 · International Journal of Biosciences

Wheat performance as affected by pre-plant and foliar application of phosphorus under inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and non-inoculation

Leila Garshasbi; Farzad Paknejad; Ali Kashani; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Increased cost of chemical phosphate fertilizer in the world and huge reserves of indigenous phosphate rocks reveals the importance of using of these resources. Little information is on the combined effect of mycorrhizal fungi and foliar application of P and the types of phosphate rocks in phosphate uptake. An experiment was conducted in during 2011-2012 growing season to determine the effects of foliar and pre-plant application of P on wheat yield and yield components in wheat inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and noninoculated plants at Research Fields of University of Tehran (Karaj), Iran. The experiment was laid out as a split plot factorial based on randomized complete block design using four replicates. The first factor was (a) foliar application of phosphorus at four levels (a1=0, a2=6, a3=8 and a4=10 kg ha-1), the second factor (b) was wheat planting in the presence or absence of mycorrhizal fungi and the third factor was (c) pre-plant application of P at three levels (c1=recommended dose, c2=25% lower than recommended dose and c3=50% lower than recommended dose). Results indicated that the highest grain yield was found in plots received foliar P at 8 kg ha -1 (7.89 ton ha-1) and plots with pre-plant P at recommended dose (7.91 ton ha -1 ). The minimum grain yield was related to plots with foliar application of P and without mycorrhizal (6.67 ton ha -1 ). The greatest and lowest biological yield were detected in plots with pre-plant P at recommended dose (17.4 ton ha-1) and 25% less than recommended dose (14.9 ton ha -1 ), respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar phosphorus at 8 kg ha -1 produced the highest grain yield of 7.89 ton ha-1.

Treatment
foliar P at 8 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
7.89 ton ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest grain yield was found in plots received foliar P at 8 kg ha -1 (7.89 ton ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The recommended pre-plant phosphorus dose produced the highest grain yield of 7.91 ton ha -1.

Treatment
pre-plant P at recommended dosee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
7.91 ton ha -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest grain yield was found in plots received foliar P at 8 kg ha -1 (7.89 ton ha-1) and plots with pre-plant P at recommended dose (7.91 ton ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plots with foliar phosphorus but without mycorrhiza had the minimum grain yield of 6.67 ton ha -1.

Treatment
foliar application of P and without mycorrhizale0
Interactor
mycorrhizale0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
minimume0
Value
6.67 ton ha -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The minimum grain yield was related to plots with foliar application of P and without mycorrhizal (6.67 ton ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1400 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The recommended pre-plant phosphorus dose gave the greatest biological yield of 17.4 ton ha-1.

Treatment
pre-plant P at recommended dosee0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
greateste0
Value
17.4 ton ha-1e0
Comparator
25% less than recommended dosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greatest and lowest biological yield were detected in plots with pre-plant P at recommended dose (17.4 ton ha-1) and 25% less than recommended dose (14.9 ton ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1571 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-plant phosphorus at 25% less than recommended gave the lowest biological yield of 14.9 ton ha -1.

Treatment
25% less than recommended dosee0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
14.9 ton ha -1e0
Comparator
pre-plant P at recommended dosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greatest and lowest biological yield were detected in plots with pre-plant P at recommended dose (17.4 ton ha-1) and 25% less than recommended dose (14.9 ton ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1571 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 95 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 524 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.