Abstract
IGH Fe content in the New Valley soils hinders the absorption of both P and Zn by plants, which is negatively reflected on crop production. Field experiments were carried out in two successive seasons at two sites under the conditions of the New Valley soils in order to increase wheat yield by the integration between mineral (P and Zn) and bio-fertilization (Mycorrhiza and Azotobacter). The first experiment was carried out at El-Monera (sandy soil), El-Kharaga Oasis, while the second one was carried out at Al-Kaser (clayey soil), El-Dakhlla Oasis. Grains of wheat variety Sakha 93 was cultivated in both locations. Application of mineral P and Zn fertilizers along or with bio-fertilizers increased wheat yield parameters, nutrients content, total antioxidants, and phenols of wheat. Moreover, increasing the application rates of P and Zn decreased Fe and Mn contents in wheat and increased N, K, Zn and Cu contents in the straw and grains. The most effective treatment for yield, nutrients and biochemical contents was by applying P at a rate of 60 kg fed -1 (1 fed = 4200 m 2 ) in clay soils and 80 kg fed -1 in sandy soils with spraying Zn at a rate of 250 mg L -1 with the Mycorrhizae and Azotobacter applications. This treatment could achieve 5.45 and 2.21 Mg fed -1 for straw and grains respectively in the sandy soil while, 9.5 and 4.16 Mg fed -1 in the clay soil. This study revealed that combining bio-and mineral P and Zn fertilizers application could decrease the negative effect of high Fe content in soils and increased wheat production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Mineral P and Zn fertilizers alone or with biofertilizers increased wheat yield parameters.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- mineral P and Zn fertilizers along or with bio-fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- wheat yield parameterse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of mineral P and Zn fertilizers along or with bio-fertilizers increased wheat yield parameters, nutrients content, total antioxidants, and phenols of wheat.”
Claim · model-written summary
The fertilizer applications increased wheat nutrient content, total antioxidants, and phenols.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- mineral P and Zn fertilizers along or with bio-fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- nutrients content, total antioxidants, and phenols of wheate0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of mineral P and Zn fertilizers along or with bio-fertilizers increased wheat yield parameters, nutrients content, total antioxidants, and phenols of wheat.”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing P and Zn rates decreased wheat Fe and Mn contents.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- increasing the application rates of P and Zne0
- Outcome
- Fe and Mn contents in wheate0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increasing the application rates of P and Zn decreased Fe and Mn contents in wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing P and Zn rates raised N, K, Zn, and Cu contents of straw and grain.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- P and Zne0
- Outcome
- N, K, Zn and Cu contents in the straw and grainse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increasing the application rates of P and Zn decreased Fe and Mn contents in wheat and increased N, K, Zn and Cu contents in the straw and grains”
t0“Wheat Production”
Claim · model-written summary
The integrated fertilizer treatment was most effective for yield, nutrients, and biochemical contents.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- applying P at a rate of 60 kg fed -1 (1 fed = 4200 m 2 ) in clay soils and 80 kg fed -1 in sandy soils with spraying Zn at a rate of 250 mg L -1 with the Mycorrhizae and Azotobacter applicationse0
- Interactor
- Mycorrhizaee0symbiont
- Second interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere0symbiont - Outcome
- yield, nutrients and biochemical contentse0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The most effective treatment for yield, nutrients and biochemical contents was by applying P at a rate of 60 kg fed -1 (1 fed = 4200 m 2 ) in clay soils and 80 kg fed -1 in sandy soils with spraying Zn at a rate of 250 mg L -1 with the Mycorrhizae and Azotobacter applications.”
t0“Wheat Production”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment yielded 5.45 Mg fed -1 of straw in sandy soil.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- strawe0
- Value
- 5.45 and 2.21 Mg fed -1e0
- Setting
- sandy soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This treatment could achieve 5.45 and 2.21 Mg fed -1 for straw and grains respectively in the sandy soil”
t0“Wheat Production”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment yielded 2.21 Mg fed -1 of grain in sandy soil.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- grainse0
- Value
- 2.21 Mg fed -1e0
- Setting
- sandy soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This treatment could achieve 5.45 and 2.21 Mg fed -1 for straw and grains respectively in the sandy soil”
t0“Wheat Production”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment yielded 9.5 Mg fed -1 of straw in clay soil.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- strawe0
- Value
- 9.5 and 4.16 Mg fed -1e0
- Setting
- clay soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This treatment could achieve 5.45 and 2.21 Mg fed -1 for straw and grains respectively in the sandy soil while, 9.5 and 4.16 Mg fed -1 in the clay soil”
t0“Wheat Production”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment yielded 4.16 Mg fed -1 of grain in clay soil.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- grainse0
- Value
- 4.16 Mg fed -1e0
- Setting
- clay soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This treatment could achieve 5.45 and 2.21 Mg fed -1 for straw and grains respectively in the sandy soil while, 9.5 and 4.16 Mg fed -1 in the clay soil”
t0“Wheat Production”
The same questions in other papers
Azotobacter · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
84 papers more in this group
See all 88 papers →zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
376 papers more in this group
See all 380 papers →zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
507 papers more in this group
See all 511 papers →zinc atom · quality: phytochemicals · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →mycorrhiza · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- positive
- no effect
99 papers more in this group
See all 103 papers →inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
610 papers more in this group
See all 614 papers →application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
873 papers more in this group
See all 877 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.