Paper · 1990

Uptake andMetabolism ofClomazone inTolerant-Soybean andSusceptible-Cott on Photomixotrophic Cell Suspension Cultures1

Michael A. Norman

12
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Studies wereconducted todetermine theuptake andmetabolismofthepigment synthesis inhibiting herbicide clomazone in tolerant-soybean (Glycine max[L.] Merr. cvCorsoy) andsusceptible-cotton (Gossypium hirsutum [L.] cvStoneville 825)photomixotrophic cell suspensions. Soybean andcotton onawhole plant level aretolerant andsusceptible toclomazone, respectively. Preliminary studies indicated thatl values forgrowth, chlorophyll (Chl), 8-carotene, andlutein were,respectively, >22, 14,19,and23timesgreater forthesoybean cell line (SB-M) 8 daysafter treatment (DAT) compared tothecotton cell line (COTM)16DAT.Differences in[14C]clomazone uptake cannot account forselectivity sincethere weresignificantly greater levels of clomazone absorbed bytheSB-Mcells compared totheCOT-M cells foreachtreatment. Thepercentage ofabsorbed clomazone converted tomorepolar metabolite(s) wassignificantly greater bytheSB-Mcells relative toCOT-Mcells at6and24hours after treatment, however, onlysmall differences existed between the cell lines by48hoursafter treatment. Nearly identical levels of parental clomazone wasrecovered frombothcell lines forall treatments. Apooled metabolite fraction isolated fromSB-Mcells hadnoeffect ontheleaf pigment content ofsusceptible velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic.) orsoybean seedlings. Conversely, apooled metabolite fraction fromCOT-Mcells reduced theleaf Chicontent ofvelvetleaf. Soybean tolerance toclomazone appearstobeduetodifferential metabolism (bioactivation) and/or differences atthesite ofaction.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean cell growth tolerance was more than 22 times that of cotton cells after clomazone treatment.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Material
SB-Me0
Treatment
clomazonee1
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
greatere0
Value
>22e0
Comparator
COTMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Preliminary studies indicated thatl values forgrowth, chlorophyll (Chl), 8-carotene, andlutein were,respectively, >22, 14,19,and23timesgreater forthesoybean cell line (SB-M) 8 daysafter treatment (DAT) compared tothecotton cell line (COTM)16DAT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–601 · show in text ↑
e1

“there weresignificantly greater levels of clomazone absorbed bytheSB-Mcells compared totheCOT-M cells foreachtreatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean cell chlorophyll tolerance was 14 times that of cotton cells after clomazone treatment.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Material
SB-Me0
Treatment
clomazonee1
Outcome
chlorophylle0
Direction
greatere0
Value
14e0
Comparator
COTMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Preliminary studies indicated thatl values forgrowth, chlorophyll (Chl), 8-carotene, andlutein were,respectively, >22, 14,19,and23timesgreater forthesoybean cell line (SB-M) 8 daysafter treatment (DAT) compared tothecotton cell line (COTM)16DAT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–601 · show in text ↑
e1

“there weresignificantly greater levels of clomazone absorbed bytheSB-Mcells compared totheCOT-M cells foreachtreatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean cell carotene tolerance was 19 times that of cotton cells.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Material
SB-Me0
Treatment
clomazonee1
Outcome
8-carotenee0
Direction
greatere0
Value
19e0
Comparator
COTMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Preliminary studies indicated thatl values forgrowth, chlorophyll (Chl), 8-carotene, andlutein were,respectively, >22, 14,19,and23timesgreater forthesoybean cell line (SB-M) 8 daysafter treatment (DAT) compared tothecotton cell line (COTM)16DAT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–601 · show in text ↑
e1

“there weresignificantly greater levels of clomazone absorbed bytheSB-Mcells compared totheCOT-M cells foreachtreatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean cell lutein tolerance was 23 times that of cotton cells.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Material
SB-Me0
Treatment
clomazonee1
Outcome
luteine0
Direction
greatere0
Value
23e0
Comparator
COTMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Preliminary studies indicated thatl values forgrowth, chlorophyll (Chl), 8-carotene, andlutein were,respectively, >22, 14,19,and23timesgreater forthesoybean cell line (SB-M) 8 daysafter treatment (DAT) compared tothecotton cell line (COTM)16DAT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–601 · show in text ↑
e1

“there weresignificantly greater levels of clomazone absorbed bytheSB-Mcells compared totheCOT-M cells foreachtreatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–791 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean cells absorbed significantly more clomazone than cotton cells under each treatment.

Taxon
SB-Me0
Material
SB-Me0
Outcome
levels of clomazone absorbede0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
COT-Me0

Verbatim

e0

“there weresignificantly greater levels of clomazone absorbed bytheSB-Mcells compared totheCOT-M cells foreachtreatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–791 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean cells converted a significantly greater fraction of absorbed clomazone to polar metabolites than cotton cells at 6 and 24 hours.

Taxon
SB-Me0
Material
SB-Me0
Outcome
percentage ofabsorbed clomazone converted tomorepolar metabolite(s)e0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
at6and24hours after treatmente0
Comparator
COT-Me0

Verbatim

e0

“Thepercentage ofabsorbed clomazone converted tomorepolar metabolite(s) wassignificantly greater bytheSB-Mcells relative toCOT-Mcells at6and24hours after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–954 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cell lines differed only slightly in clomazone conversion by 48 hours.

Taxon
cell linese0
Outcome
differencese0
Qualifier
by48hoursafter treatmente0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“onlysmall differences existed between the cell lines by48hoursafter treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1043 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two cell lines retained nearly identical amounts of parent clomazone.

Taxon
cell linese0
Outcome
levels of parental clomazonee0
Direction
Nearly identicale0

Verbatim

e0

“Nearly identical levels of parental clomazone wasrecovered frombothcell lines forall treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metabolites from soybean cells did not affect velvetleaf leaf pigments.

Taxon
velvetleafAbutilon theophrastie0
Treatment
metabolite fraction isolated fromSB-Mcellse0
Outcome
leaf pigment contente0
Direction
noeffecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · TaxonI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apooled metabolite fraction isolated fromSB-Mcells hadnoeffect ontheleaf pigment content ofsusceptible velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic.) orsoybean seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metabolites from soybean cells did not affect soybean seedling leaf pigments.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
metabolite fraction isolated fromSB-Mcellse0
Outcome
leaf pigment contente0
Direction
noeffecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apooled metabolite fraction isolated fromSB-Mcells hadnoeffect ontheleaf pigment content ofsusceptible velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic.) orsoybean seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metabolites from cotton cells reduced velvetleaf leaf chlorophyll.

Taxon
velvetleafAbutilon theophrastie0
Treatment
metabolite fraction fromCOT-Mcellse0
Outcome
leaf Chicontente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · TaxonI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apooled metabolite fraction fromCOT-Mcells reduced theleaf Chicontent ofvelvetleaf.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1401 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean tolerance to clomazone was attributed to differential metabolism or differences at the site of action.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
tolerance toclomazonee0
Qualifier
differential metabolism (bioactivation) and/or differences atthesite ofactione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soybean tolerance toclomazone appearstobeduetodifferential metabolism (bioactivation) and/or differences atthesite ofaction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1526 · show in text ↑

clomazone · molecular: metabolites · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

clomazone · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

metabolite · physiology: pigments · Abutilon theophrasti (velvetleaf)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

metabolite · physiology: pigments · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.