Paper · 2016 · Journal of oilseed Brassica

Sodicity-induced antioxidative system in roots of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive cultivars of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)

Veena Jain; Babita Rani; Sunita Jain

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A differential response of sodicity was observed on enzymatic and non-enzymatic components of antioxidant system in roots of salt-sensitive RH 8113 and salt-tolerant CS 52 varieties of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). The antioxidative enzymes viz. superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione reductase (GR), peroxidase (POX), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) showed higher basal activities in roots of salt-tolerant CS 52 cultivar as compared to salt-sensitive RH 8113. Imposition of sodicity stress (15-45 ESP) had no effect on SOD and APX activity in roots of CS 52, but it resulted in reduction in activity in salt-sensitive RH 8113. In both varieties, the POX activity decreased progressively with increase in stress level , but the level of decrease was more in RH 8113 as compared to that in salt-tolerant CS 52. Contrarily, GR activity increased in tolerant cultivar CS 52, but showed a continuous reduction with increment in sodic stress in the sensitive cv. RH 8113. The amount of ascorbic acid, reduced glutathione, and ratio of reduced (GSH)/ oxidized glutathione (GSSG) were higher in tolerant than in sensitive ciltivar under sodic conditions. It is inferred that roots of tolerant cv. CS 52 tend to attain greater capacity to perform reaction of antioxidative pathway under sodic conditions to combat sodicity-induced oxidative stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerant CS 52 had higher basal SOD, GR and POX activities than sensitive RH 8113.

Taxon
Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)Brassica junceat0
Material
CS 52e0
Outcome
superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione reductase (GR), peroxidase (POX)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
RH 8113e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione reductase (GR), peroxidase (POX), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) showed higher basal activities in roots of salt-tolerant CS 52 cultivar as compared to salt-sensitive RH 8113.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerant CS 52 had higher basal APX activity.

Taxon
Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)Brassica junceat0
Material
CS 52e0
Outcome
ascorbate peroxidase (APX)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
RH 8113e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ascorbate peroxidase (APX) showed higher basal activities in roots of salt-tolerant CS 52 cultivar as compared to salt-sensitive RH 8113.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodicity did not change SOD and APX activity in CS 52 roots.

Taxon
Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)Brassica junceat0
Material
CS 52e0
Treatment
sodicity stress (15-45 ESP)e0
Outcome
SOD and APX activitye0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imposition of sodicity stress (15-45 ESP) had no effect on SOD and APX activity in roots of CS 52”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–566 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodicity reduced SOD and APX activity in RH 8113.

Taxon
Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)Brassica junceat0
Material
RH 8113e0
Treatment
sodicity stress (15-45 ESP)e0
Outcome
SOD and APX activitye0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imposition of sodicity stress (15-45 ESP) had no effect on SOD and APX activity in roots of CS 52, but it resulted in reduction in activity in salt-sensitive RH 8113.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–635 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–131 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POX activity decreased with stress in both varieties, more in RH 8113.

Taxon
Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)Brassica junceat0
Material
RH 8113e0
Treatment
stress levele0
Outcome
POX activitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
CS 52e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both varieties, the POX activity decreased progressively with increase in stress level , but the level of decrease was more in RH 8113 as compared to that in salt-tolerant CS 52.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–131 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GR activity increased in tolerant CS 52 under sodic stress.

Taxon
Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)Brassica junceat0
Material
CS 52e0
Treatment
sodic stresse0
Outcome
GR activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Contrarily, GR activity increased in tolerant cultivar CS 52, but showed a continuous reduction with increment in sodic stress in the sensitive cv. RH 8113.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–131 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GR activity declined with sodic stress in sensitive RH 8113.

Taxon
Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)Brassica junceat0
Material
RH 8113e0
Treatment
sodic stresse0
Outcome
GR activitye0
Direction
reductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Contrarily, GR activity increased in tolerant cultivar CS 52, but showed a continuous reduction with increment in sodic stress in the sensitive cv. RH 8113.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbic acid, reduced glutathione and GSH/GSSG ratio were higher in tolerant cultivar under sodic conditions.

Taxon
Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)Brassica junceat0
Outcome
amount of ascorbic acid, reduced glutathione, and ratio of reduced (GSH)/ oxidized glutathione (GSSG)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sensitive ciltivare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The amount of ascorbic acid, reduced glutathione, and ratio of reduced (GSH)/ oxidized glutathione (GSSG) were higher in tolerant than in sensitive ciltivar under sodic conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–131 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors infer greater antioxidant pathway capacity in CS 52 roots under sodicity.

Taxon
Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)Brassica junceat0
Material
CS 52e0
Outcome
greater capacity to perform reaction of antioxidative pathwaye0
Qualifier
under sodic conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“roots of tolerant cv. CS 52 tend to attain greater capacity to perform reaction of antioxidative pathway under sodic conditions to combat sodicity-induced oxidative stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1348 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–131 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.