Abstract
Inoculation with Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceri alone adversely affected the growth of chickpea cv. Annegiri-1. The reduction of plant growth characters and severity of root-knot and wilt incidence were more with increased levels of nematode and fungus inoculum and the interaction effects were more in combination than either of them alone. Inoculation of nematode along with fungus at lower levels resulted in 19.88 per cent wilt incidence when compared to 6.66 per cent with fungus alone. However, maximum wilt incidence (66.67%) was observed when inoculated with 2 juveniles/g soil and 25g inoculum/500g soil of nematode and fungus respectively. Presence of root-knot nematode along with fungus adversely affected the root-knot disease.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Meloidogyne inoculation adversely affected chickpea growth.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- Inoculation with Meloidogyne incognitae0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae0pathogen - Outcome
- growth of chickpeae0
- Direction
- adversely affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation with Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceri alone adversely affected the growth of chickpea cv. Annegiri-1.”
Claim · model-written summary
Fusarium inoculation adversely affected chickpea growth.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cicerie0
- Interactor
- Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceri
_(Fusarium_oxysporum_f.sp._batatas)_1234227-PPT-Clemson_University.jpg?width=60)
Fusarium oxysporume0pathogen - Outcome
- growth of chickpeae0
- Direction
- adversely affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_(Fusarium_oxysporum_f.sp._batatas)_1234227-PPT-Clemson_University.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation with Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceri alone adversely affected the growth of chickpea cv. Annegiri-1.”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher nematode and fungal inoculum levels reduced plant growth more.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- increased levels of nematode and fungus inoculume0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogent0
- Second interactor
- Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. CicriFusarium oxysporumt1pathogent0
- Outcome
- plant growth characterse0
- Direction
- reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The reduction of plant growth characters and severity of root-knot and wilt incidence were more with increased levels of nematode and fungus inoculum and the interaction effects were more in combination than either of them alone.”
t0“chickpea”
t1“Interaction between Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. Cicri at different inoculum levels on chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher inoculum levels increased root-knot and wilt severity.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- increased levels of nematode and fungus inoculume0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogent0
- Second interactor
- Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. CicriFusarium oxysporumt1pathogent0
- Outcome
- severity of root-knot and wilt incidencee0
- Direction
- moree0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“severity of root-knot and wilt incidence were more with increased levels of nematode and fungus inoculum”
t0“chickpea”
t1“Interaction between Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. Cicri at different inoculum levels on chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined inoculation had stronger effects than either organism alone.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- in combinatione0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogent0
- Second interactor
- Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. CicriFusarium oxysporumt1pathogent0
- Outcome
- interaction effectse0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- either of them alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the interaction effects were more in combination than either of them alone.”
t0“chickpea”
t1“Interaction between Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. Cicri at different inoculum levels on chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Low combined inoculum produced 19.88 per cent wilt incidence versus 6.66 per cent with fungus alone.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Inoculation of nematode along with fungus at lower levelse0
- Interactor
- Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. CicriFusarium oxysporumt1pathogent0
- Second interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogent0
- Outcome
- wilt incidencee0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 19.88 per cente0
- Qualifier
- 6.66 per cente0
- Comparator
- fungus alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of nematode along with fungus at lower levels resulted in 19.88 per cent wilt incidence when compared to 6.66 per cent with fungus alone.”
t0“chickpea”
t1“Interaction between Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. Cicri at different inoculum levels on chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest wilt incidence was 66.67% under the stated combined inoculum doses.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 2 juveniles/g soil and 25g inoculum/500g soil of nematode and funguse0
- Interactor
- Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. CicriFusarium oxysporumt1pathogent0
- Second interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogent0
- Outcome
- wilt incidencee0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 66.67%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum wilt incidence (66.67%) was observed when inoculated with 2 juveniles/g soil and 25g inoculum/500g soil of nematode and fungus respectively.”
t0“chickpea”
t1“Interaction between Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. Cicri at different inoculum levels on chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Nematode presence with fungus adversely affected root-knot disease.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogent0
- Second interactor
- Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. CicriFusarium oxysporumt1pathogent0
- Outcome
- root-knot diseasee0
- Direction
- adversely affectede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Presence of root-knot nematode along with fungus adversely affected the root-knot disease.”
t0“chickpea”
t1“Interaction between Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. Cicri at different inoculum levels on chickpea”
The same questions in other papers
Meloidogyne incognita · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Fusarium oxysporum · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
- negative
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →inoculation · Meloidogyne incognita · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →inoculation · Fusarium oxysporum · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →inoculation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 135 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
148 papers more in this group
See all 152 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.