Paper · 2010 · Acta Horticulturae

PROPERLY TIMED FOLIAR FERTILIZATION CAN AND SHOULD RESULT IN A YIELD BENEFIT AND NET INCREASE IN GROWER INCOME

C. Gonzalez; Y. Zheng; C.J. Lovatt

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Foliar fertilization reduces nutrient accumulation in soil, run-off and groundwater, where they contribute to salinity, eutrophication or nitrate contamination, with negative consequences to humans and the environment. Soil-applied fertilizers should be replaced in part with foliar-applied fertilizers. Foliar fertilizers can meet the crop's nutrient demand when soil temperature, moisture, pH, or salinity renders soil-applied fertilizers ineffective. Applying nutrients directly to leaves ensures that the plant's photosynthetic machinery is not compromised by low availability of an essential nutrient. Foliar-applied phloem-mobile nutrients are translocated to all plant parts, even feeder roots. However, not all nutrients are taken up through leaves and, even if taken up, some nutrients are not phloem mobile. Foliar fertilizer rates are typically lower than soil fertilizer rates, but application can be more costly. The goal of our research is to properly time the application of foliar fertilizers at specific stages of tree phenology, when nutrient demand is likely high, to increase yield, fruit size or quality, such that foliar fertilization results in a net increase in grower income even when the tree is not nutrient deficient by standard leaf analysis. A single foliar application of zinc sulphate to Citrus sinensis, 'Washington' navel orange, at 10% anthesis significantly increased fruit set through harvest in January, without impact on fruit size or quality. Later applications reduced fruit set. Winter (December) prebloom foliar application of low-biuret urea to C. reticulata, 'Nules' Clementine mandarin, increased 2-year cumulative yield of commercially valuable fruit (transverse diameter 63.51-69.85 mm) as both kg and number of fruit per tree with no effect on total yield or fruit quality. Earlier or later applications were without effect. Foliar application of potassium phosphite to Persea americana, 'Hass', at the cauliflower stage of inflorescence development significantly increased 3-year cumulative yield (kg and number of fruit per tree) of commercially valuable fruit (178-325 g per fruit) compared to trees receiving foliar- or soil-applied potassium phosphate. All cases resulted in a net increase in grower income.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc sulphate at 10% anthesis significantly increased Washington navel orange fruit set through January harvest.

Taxon
Citrus sinensisCitrus sinensise0
Material
'Washington' navel orangee0
Organ / stage
10% anthesise0
Treatment
A single foliar application of zinc sulphatee0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A single foliar application of zinc sulphate to Citrus sinensis, 'Washington' navel orange, at 10% anthesis significantly increased fruit set through harvest in January”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1440 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The orange zinc application did not affect fruit size or quality.

Taxon
Citrus sinensisCitrus sinensise0
Material
'Washington' navel orangee0
Treatment
A single foliar application of zinc sulphatee0
Outcome
fruit size or qualitye0
Direction
without impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A single foliar application of zinc sulphate to Citrus sinensis, 'Washington' navel orange, at 10% anthesis significantly increased fruit set through harvest in January, without impact on fruit size or quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later zinc applications reduced orange fruit set.

Taxon
Citrus sinensisCitrus sinensise0
Treatment
Later applicationse0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A single foliar application of zinc sulphate to Citrus sinensis, 'Washington' navel orange, at 10% anthesis significantly increased fruit set through harvest in January, without impact on fruit size or quality. Later applications reduced fruit set”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter prebloom low-biuret urea increased commercially valuable Clementine mandarin fruit yield in kg and number over two years.

Taxon
C. reticulataCitrus reticulatae0
Material
'Nules' Clementine mandarine0
Treatment
Winter (December) prebloom foliar application of low-biuret ureae0
Outcome
2-year cumulative yield of commercially valuable fruite0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
transverse diameter 63.51-69.85 mme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus reticulata
Citrus reticulata · TaxonJoe Ravi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter (December) prebloom foliar application of low-biuret urea to C. reticulata, 'Nules' Clementine mandarin, increased 2-year cumulative yield of commercially valuable fruit (transverse diameter 63.51-69.85 mm) as both kg and number of fruit per tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The winter prebloom urea application had no effect on total mandarin yield or fruit quality.

Taxon
C. reticulataCitrus reticulatae0
Treatment
Winter (December) prebloom foliar application of low-biuret ureae0
Outcome
total yield or fruit qualitye0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus reticulata
Citrus reticulata · TaxonJoe Ravi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter (December) prebloom foliar application of low-biuret urea to C. reticulata, 'Nules' Clementine mandarin, increased 2-year cumulative yield of commercially valuable fruit (transverse diameter 63.51-69.85 mm) as both kg and number of fruit per tree with no effect on total yield or fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier or later urea applications had no effect on mandarin yield.

Taxon
C. reticulataCitrus reticulatae0
Treatment
Earlier or later applicationse0
Outcome
without effecte0
Direction
without effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus reticulata
Citrus reticulata · TaxonJoe Ravi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter (December) prebloom foliar application of low-biuret urea to C. reticulata, 'Nules' Clementine mandarin, increased 2-year cumulative yield of commercially valuable fruit (transverse diameter 63.51-69.85 mm) as both kg and number of fruit per tree with no effect on total yield or fruit quality. Earlier or later applications were without effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium phosphite at the cauliflower inflorescence stage significantly increased three-year commercially valuable Hass avocado yield against potassium phosphate.

Taxon
Persea americanaPersea americanae0
Material
'Hass'e0
Organ / stage
cauliflower stage of inflorescence developmente0
Treatment
Foliar application of potassium phosphitee0
Outcome
3-year cumulative yield (kg and number of fruit per tree) of commercially valuable fruite0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
178-325 g per fruite0
Comparator
trees receiving foliar- or soil-applied potassium phosphatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Persea americana
Persea americana · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of potassium phosphite to Persea americana, 'Hass', at the cauliflower stage of inflorescence development significantly increased 3-year cumulative yield (kg and number of fruit per tree) of commercially valuable fruit (178-325 g per fruit) compared to trees receiving foliar- or soil-applied potassium phosphate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1874–2205 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three foliar fertilization cases increased grower income.

Outcome
grower incomee0
Direction
net increasee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“All cases resulted in a net increase in grower income”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2207–2260 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

application · quality: grain · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

application · quality: general · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · yield · Persea americana (avocado)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

application · yield · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

application · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 65 positive, 12 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

potassium · yield · Persea americana (avocado)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.