Abstract
The effect of foliar spray of brassinosteroids (BR), N-2-chloro 4-pyridyl N-phenyl urea (CPPU) and jasmonic acid (JA) along with traditional growth regulators like GA3, benzyl adenine (BA) and NAA on growth, flowering and corm and cornmel production of two gladiolus varieties Jyotsna and Shabnum were investigated. Jyotsna recorded maximum plant height, number of leaves and leaf area over cv. Shabnum. GA3 treatment recorded maximum plant height, number of leaves and leaf length over other treatments. Jyotsna was superior over Shabnum in respect of spike length, spike field life and number of days taken for flowering. GA3 and jasmonic acid increased spike length, number of florets per spike and spike field life over other treatments. All the growth regulators except NAA recorded maximum leaf area during vegetative growth resulting early flowering. The two cultivars did not differ in the number of corms produced per plot but the cv. Shabnum was superior in producing more number of big cormels. Corm size, corm weight and corm volume were maximum in Jyotsna than Shabnum. Propagation coefficient was highest in the Shabnum. Foliar sprays of jasmonic acid and brassinosteroids significantly increased the number of corms and cormels produced per plot and propagation coefficient.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Jyotsna had greater plant height, leaf number and leaf area than Shabnum.
- Material
- Jyotsnae1
- Outcome
- plant height, number of leaves and leaf areae1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Comparator
- Shabnume1
GladiolusOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“two gladiolus varieties Jyotsna and Shabnum”
e1“Jyotsna recorded maximum plant height, number of leaves and leaf area over cv. Shabnum”
Claim · model-written summary
GA3 maximized plant height, leaf number and leaf length over other treatments.
- Treatment
- GA3 treatmente1
- Outcome
- plant height, number of leaves and leaf lengthe1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Comparator
- other treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gladiolus varieties”
e1“GA3 treatment recorded maximum plant height, number of leaves and leaf length over other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Jyotsna had greater spike length and field life than Shabnum.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gladiolus varieties”
e1“Jyotsna was superior over Shabnum in respect of spike length, spike field life and number of days taken for flowering”
Claim · model-written summary
Jyotsna differed from Shabnum in days to flowering, described as superior.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gladiolus varieties”
e1“Jyotsna was superior over Shabnum in respect of spike length, spike field life and number of days taken for flowering”
Claim · model-written summary
GA3 increased spike length, floret number and field life over other treatments.
- Treatment
- GA3e1
- Outcome
- spike length, number of florets per spike and spike field lifee1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- other treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gladiolus varieties”
e1“GA3 and jasmonic acid increased spike length, number of florets per spike and spike field life over other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Jasmonic acid increased spike length, floret number and field life over other treatments.
- Treatment
- jasmonic acide1
- Outcome
- spike length, number of florets per spike and spike field lifee1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- other treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gladiolus varieties”
e1“GA3 and jasmonic acid increased spike length, number of florets per spike and spike field life over other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth regulators other than NAA maximized vegetative leaf area.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gladiolus varieties”
e1“All the growth regulators except NAA recorded maximum leaf area during vegetative growth resulting early flowering”
Claim · model-written summary
The larger leaf area under growth regulators was linked to earlier flowering.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gladiolus varieties”
e1“maximum leaf area during vegetative growth resulting early flowering”
Claim · model-written summary
The cultivars did not differ in corms per plot.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gladiolus varieties”
e1“The two cultivars did not differ in the number of corms produced per plot”
Claim · model-written summary
Shabnum produced more big cormels.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gladiolus varieties”
e1“cv. Shabnum was superior in producing more number of big cormels”
Claim · model-written summary
Jyotsna had maximal corm size, weight and volume relative to Shabnum.
- Material
- Jyotsnae1
- Outcome
- Corm size, corm weight and corm volumee1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Comparator
- Shabnume1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gladiolus varieties”
e1“Corm size, corm weight and corm volume were maximum in Jyotsna than Shabnum”
Claim · model-written summary
Shabnum had the highest propagation coefficient.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gladiolus varieties”
e1“Propagation coefficient was highest in the Shabnum”
Claim · model-written summary
Jasmonic acid sprays significantly increased corm and cormel number and propagation coefficient.
- Treatment
- Foliar sprays of jasmonic acide1
- Outcome
- number of corms and cormels produced per plot and propagation coefficiente1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gladiolus varieties”
e1“Foliar sprays of jasmonic acid and brassinosteroids significantly increased the number of corms and cormels produced per plot and propagation coefficient”
Claim · model-written summary
Brassinosteroid sprays significantly increased corm and cormel number and propagation coefficient.
- Treatment
- brassinosteroidse1
- Outcome
- number of corms and cormels produced per plot and propagation coefficiente1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gladiolus varieties”
e1“Foliar sprays of jasmonic acid and brassinosteroids significantly increased the number of corms and cormels produced per plot and propagation coefficient”
The same questions in other papers
1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · GladiolusPositive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →Gibberellic acid · growth · GladiolusPositive and negative results
37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →class · growth · GladiolusResults agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.