Abstract
Effect of different plant growth regulator sprays (GA3, TIBA, CPPU and BR) on growth and flowering of two gladiolus cultivars Darshan and Dhiraj was investigated for two consecutive years, 2008-09 and 2009-10. Growth regulators were sprayed at 3 rd and 6th leaf stage. Cv. Darshan differed significantly with cv. Dhiraj in respect to plant height, leaf area and flowered earlier. GA3 150 ppm followed by brassinosteroid (BR) 10 ppm recorded maximum plant height, number of leaves and leaf area during vegetative growth and resulted in earlier flowering. TIBA 100 ppm, TIBA 50 ppm and control recorded significantly minimum leaf area and showed delayed flowering. Cv. Dhiraj recorded maximum percentage of plants flowered than the cv.Darshan. Cv. Darshan recorded significantly highest spike length and inter floret length and minimum days to wilting of spike over the cv. Dhiraj. Cv. Dhiraj was significantly superior over cv. Darshan in respect of number of florets per spike and longevity of spike. Maximum spike length and weight, number of florets per spike and spike field life were recorded with GA3 150 ppm. Lowest values in respect of flower parameters were recorded with TIBA treatments and control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar Darshan differed significantly from Dhiraj in plant height, leaf area and flowering time.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Gladiolus”
e0“Cv. Darshan differed significantly with cv. Dhiraj in respect to plant height, leaf area and flowered earlier”
Claim · model-written summary
GA3 150 ppm followed by BR 10 ppm gave maximum plant height, leaf number and leaf area in vegetative growth.
- Treatment
- GA3 150 ppm followed by brassinosteroid (BR) 10 ppme0
- Outcome
- plant height, number of leaves and leaf areae0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Gladiolus”
e0“GA3 150 ppm followed by brassinosteroid (BR) 10 ppm recorded maximum plant height, number of leaves and leaf area during vegetative growth and resulted in earlier flowering”
Claim · model-written summary
GA3 150 ppm followed by BR 10 ppm resulted in earlier flowering.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Gladiolus”
e0“GA3 150 ppm followed by brassinosteroid (BR) 10 ppm recorded maximum plant height, number of leaves and leaf area during vegetative growth and resulted in earlier flowering”
Claim · model-written summary
TIBA 100 ppm gave significantly minimum leaf area compared with control.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Gladiolus”
e0“TIBA 100 ppm, TIBA 50 ppm and control recorded significantly minimum leaf area and showed delayed flowering”
Claim · model-written summary
TIBA 100 ppm delayed flowering compared with control.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Gladiolus”
e0“TIBA 100 ppm, TIBA 50 ppm and control recorded significantly minimum leaf area and showed delayed flowering”
Claim · model-written summary
TIBA 50 ppm gave significantly minimum leaf area compared with control.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Gladiolus”
e0“TIBA 100 ppm, TIBA 50 ppm and control recorded significantly minimum leaf area and showed delayed flowering”
Claim · model-written summary
TIBA 50 ppm delayed flowering compared with control.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Gladiolus”
e0“TIBA 100 ppm, TIBA 50 ppm and control recorded significantly minimum leaf area and showed delayed flowering”
Claim · model-written summary
TIBA treatments and control gave the lowest flower parameters.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Gladiolus”
e0“Lowest values in respect of flower parameters were recorded with TIBA treatments and control”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar Dhiraj had the maximum percentage of plants flowered compared with Darshan.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Gladiolus”
e0“Cv. Dhiraj recorded maximum percentage of plants flowered than the cv.Darshan”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar Darshan had the highest spike length and inter floret length compared with Dhiraj.
- Material
- Darshane0
- Outcome
- spike length and inter floret lengthe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- cv. Dhiraje0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Gladiolus”
e0“Cv. Darshan recorded significantly highest spike length and inter floret length and minimum days to wilting of spike over the cv. Dhiraj”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar Darshan had the minimum days to wilting of spike compared with Dhiraj.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Gladiolus”
e0“Cv. Darshan recorded significantly highest spike length and inter floret length and minimum days to wilting of spike over the cv. Dhiraj”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar Dhiraj was superior to Darshan in number of florets per spike and spike longevity.
- Material
- Dhiraje0
- Outcome
- number of florets per spike and longevity of spikee0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- cv. Darshane0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Gladiolus”
e0“Cv. Dhiraj was significantly superior over cv. Darshan in respect of number of florets per spike and longevity of spike”
Claim · model-written summary
GA3 150 ppm gave maximum spike length and weight and number of florets per spike.
- Treatment
- GA3 150 ppme0
- Outcome
- spike length and weight, number of florets per spikee0
- Direction
- Maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Gladiolus”
e0“Maximum spike length and weight, number of florets per spike and spike field life were recorded with GA3 150 ppm”
Claim · model-written summary
GA3 150 ppm gave maximum spike field life.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Gladiolus”
e0“Maximum spike length and weight, number of florets per spike and spike field life were recorded with GA3 150 ppm”
The same questions in other papers
Gibberellic acid · phenology · GladiolusPositive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Gibberellic acid · growth · GladiolusPositive and negative results
37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid · phenology · GladiolusResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
brassinolide · growth · GladiolusResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
class · phenology · GladiolusResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
class · growth · GladiolusResults agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.