Paper · 2010 · THE ASIAN JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURE

Effect of organic manures and biofertilizers on quality of tomato fruits.

P. U. Gosavi; A. B. Kamble; B. S. Pandure

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out at Mahatma phule Kristi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri (M.S) during Kharif 2004. to study the effect of organic manures with biofertilizer on fruit characters of tomato hybrid RTH-2. The experiment consisted of eleven treatments with three replications in Randomized Block Design. FYM, cotton seed cake and poultry manure were applied in combination at 25,50 and 75 per cent level as N source. Vermiphos and sulphate of potash were used as source of phosphorus and potassium, respectively. The important fruit quality parameter such as pericarp thickness, TSS, acidity, ascorbic acid, lycopene were found to be better in the treatment with organic fertilizers in combination biofertilizer. it could be concluded that, organic sources with use of biofertilizers had a beneficial effect in tomato production and can be practiced for better quality fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizers with biofertilizer improved tomato fruit pericarp thickness, TSS, and acidity.

Treatment
organic fertilizers in combination biofertilizere0
Outcome
pericarp thickness, TSS, aciditye0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“The important fruit quality parameter such as pericarp thickness, TSS, acidity, ascorbic acid, lycopene were found to be better in the treatment with organic fertilizers in combination biofertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–719 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizers with biofertilizer improved tomato fruit ascorbic acid and lycopene.

Treatment
organic fertilizers in combination biofertilizere0
Outcome
ascorbic acid, lycopenee0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“The important fruit quality parameter such as pericarp thickness, TSS, acidity, ascorbic acid, lycopene were found to be better in the treatment with organic fertilizers in combination biofertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–719 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend organic sources with biofertilizers for better quality tomato fruit.

Treatment
organic sources with use of biofertilizerse0
Outcome
can be practiced for better quality fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic sources with use of biofertilizers had a beneficial effect in tomato production and can be practiced for better quality fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–883 · show in text ↑

inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

inoculation · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 49 positive, 4 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 129 positive, 15 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

171 papers: 155 positive, 16 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.