Paper · 2019 · Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Sciences

Response Of Growth, Yield And Fruit Quality Of Tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum L.) To Different Organic Fertilizer Treatments Under Two Pest Control Programs Against Tuta Absoluta In a New Valley-Egypt

mohamed ali; Ahmed El-Tokhy; Mohamed El-Sherbini; et al.

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Farm of Faculty of Agriculture, New Valley University during 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 to study the impact of some organic fertilizers (poultry, cattle , sheep manures) and mineral fertilizers under, Traditional pest control (TPC) and Integrated pest management (IPM) on growth, yield and fruit quality of tomato cv. Rawan F1. The results indicated that mineral fertilization significantly surpassed organic manures in all vegetative growth characters, yield and yield components. Organic manure treatments significantly increased fruit contents of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, vitamin C, licobin, total soluble solids and total sugars compared to chemical fertilization in both seasons. TPC followed by IPM treatment exhibited best results for all studied characters compared to control , except number of fruits/plant and unmarketable yield, fruit content of carotenoid, total phenol, total flavonoid, water content and acidity. The differences between TPC and IPM programs were insignificant for yield and its components. Furthermore, interaction between chemical fertilization and traditional program gave highest growth and yield parameters, while interaction between poultry manure and traditional program gave fruits higher chemical content compared to other interactions. Based on results, it could be recommended that fertilized tomato plants with mineral treatment under IPM gave the best yield and the highest reduction percentage of infested leaflets with T. absoluta larvae and of adult moths/trap/day, although TPC gave a slight insignificant increment in tomato yield, while soil application of composted poultry manure before tomato planting by 10.76 ton/fed, under TPC improved the quality of tomato fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilization significantly exceeded organic manures for vegetative growth, yield and yield components.

Treatment
mineral fertilizatione0
Outcome
vegetative growth characters, yield and yield componentse0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
organic manurese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mineral fertilization significantly surpassed organic manures in all vegetative growth characters, yield and yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–513 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manures significantly raised fruit N, P and K relative to chemical fertilization.

Treatment
Organic manure treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit contents of N, P, Ke0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both seasonse0
Comparator
chemical fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic manure treatments significantly increased fruit contents of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, vitamin C, licobin, total soluble solids and total sugars compared to chemical fertilization in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manures significantly raised fruit Ca, Mg and vitamin C relative to chemical fertilization.

Treatment
Organic manure treatmentse0
Outcome
Ca, Mg, vitamin Ce0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both seasonse0
Comparator
chemical fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic manure treatments significantly increased fruit contents of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, vitamin C, licobin, total soluble solids and total sugars compared to chemical fertilization in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manures significantly raised fruit lycopene, soluble solids and sugars relative to chemical fertilization.

Treatment
Organic manure treatmentse0
Outcome
licobin, total soluble solids and total sugarse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both seasonse0
Comparator
chemical fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic manure treatments significantly increased fruit contents of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, vitamin C, licobin, total soluble solids and total sugars compared to chemical fertilization in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TPC followed by IPM performed best for most studied characters relative to control, with stated exceptions.

Treatment
TPCe0
Outcome
best results for all studied characterse0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
except number of fruits/plant and unmarketable yield, fruit content of carotenoid, total phenol, total flavonoid, water content and aciditye0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TPC followed by IPM treatment exhibited best results for all studied characters compared to control , except number of fruits/plant and unmarketable yield, fruit content of carotenoid, total phenol, total flavonoid, water content and acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TPC and IPM did not differ significantly in yield and yield components.

Treatment
TPCe0
Outcome
yield and its componentse0
Comparator
IPM programse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The differences between TPC and IPM programs were insignificant for yield and its components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1045 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilization with TPC yielded the highest growth and yield parameters.

Treatment
chemical fertilization and traditional programe0
Outcome
growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interaction between chemical fertilization and traditional program gave highest growth and yield parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure with TPC yielded higher fruit chemical content than other combinations.

Treatment
poultry manure and traditional programe0
Outcome
chemical contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other interactionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interaction between poultry manure and traditional program gave fruits higher chemical content compared to other interactions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizer under IPM gave the best yield and greatest reduction of Tuta absoluta infested leaflets and trapped adults.

Treatment
mineral treatment under IPMe0
Interactor
T. absolutaTuta absolutae0pest
Outcome
best yield and the highest reduction percentage of infested leaflets with T. absoluta larvae and of adult moths/trap/daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mineral treatment under IPM gave the best yield and the highest reduction percentage of infested leaflets with T. absoluta larvae and of adult moths/trap/day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1536 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TPC gave a slight, non-significant increment in tomato yield relative to IPM.

Treatment
TPCe0
Outcome
tomato yielde0
Direction
incremente0
Qualifier
slighte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TPC gave a slight insignificant increment in tomato yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1547–1604 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 10.76 ton/fed composted poultry manure under TPC to improve tomato fruit quality.

Treatment
soil application of composted poultry manure before tomato planting by 10.76 ton/fed, under TPCe0
Outcome
quality of tomato fruitse0
Direction
improvede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil application of composted poultry manure before tomato planting by 10.76 ton/fed, under TPC improved the quality of tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1745 · show in text ↑

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 107 positive, 20 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 129 positive, 15 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

171 papers: 155 positive, 16 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

271 papers: 226 positive, 45 negative or no effect

225 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

267 papers more in this group

See all 271 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.