Paper · 2015 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Photosynthesis and Remobilization of Dry Matter in Wheat as Affected by Progressive Drought Stress at Stem Elongation Stage

Ö. Tatar; H. Brück; F. Asch

13
claims
29
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract With increasingly erratic rainfall patterns particularly in drought‐prone production systems, the capacity of plants to recover productively from drought spells becomes an important feature for yield stability in rainfed agriculture. Consequently, effects of water management at the stem elongation stage on partitioning and remobilization of dry matter, alteration in photosynthesis and water‐use efficiency ( WUE ), and yield components of wheat plants were studied in a glasshouse pot experiment. The plants were subjected to three soil moisture regimes: well watered during all phenological stages ( WW ), drought affected during stem elongation and post‐anthesis stages ( DD ) and drought affected during stem elongation and rewatered at post‐anthesis stage ( DW ). Total dry weight substantially decreased by both drought treatments. However, DD plants allocated relatively higher assimilates to roots whereas DW plants remobilized them to the grains. Drought applications resulted in a decrease of grain yield and thousand grain weight while reduction was more pronounced in DD treatment. Relative contribution of post‐anthesis photosynthesis to dry matter formation in grain was higher in WW treatment (72.6 %) than DD (68.5 %) and DW (68.2 %) treatments. Photosynthetic rate, gas exchange and transpiration decreased whereas leaf (photosynthetic) and plant level WUE increased with drought applications. However, all these parameters were rapidly and completely reversed by rewatering. Our findings showed that partitioning of dry weight to grain increases with rewatering of wheat plants subjected to drought during stem elongation phase, but the relative contributions of remobilization of stem reserves and post‐anthesis photosynthesis to grain did not change. Moreover, rewatering of plants at booting stage after a drought period lead to full recovery in photosynthesis and WUE , and a significant although partial recovery of yield components, such as grain yield, TGW and harvest index.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total dry weight of wheat decreased under both drought treatments compared with well-watered plants.

Treatment
drought treatmentse1
Outcome
Total dry weighte1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
well waterede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield components of wheat plants were studied in a glasshouse pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–507 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total dry weight substantially decreased by both drought treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–847 · show in text ↑
e2

“well watered during all phenological stages ( WW )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–617 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under DD drought, wheat allocated relatively more assimilates to roots.

Treatment
DDe1
Outcome
assimilates to rootse1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield components of wheat plants were studied in a glasshouse pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–507 · show in text ↑
e1

“DD plants allocated relatively higher assimilates to roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under DW drought, wheat remobilized assimilates to the grains.

Treatment
DWe1
Outcome
remobilized them to the grainse1
Direction
remobilizede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield components of wheat plants were studied in a glasshouse pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–507 · show in text ↑
e1

“DW plants remobilized them to the grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased grain yield and thousand grain weight of wheat.

Treatment
Drought applicationse1
Outcome
grain yield and thousand grain weighte1
Direction
decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield components of wheat plants were studied in a glasshouse pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–507 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drought applications resulted in a decrease of grain yield and thousand grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1051 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reduction in grain yield and thousand grain weight was more pronounced under DD than under the other drought treatment.

Treatment
DD treatmente1
Outcome
reductione1
Direction
more pronouncede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield components of wheat plants were studied in a glasshouse pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–507 · show in text ↑
e1

“while reduction was more pronounced in DD treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1103 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The relative contribution of post-anthesis photosynthesis to grain dry matter was higher under WW (72.6 %) than under DD (68.5 %) and DW (68.2 %).

Treatment
WW treatmente1
Outcome
Relative contributione1
Direction
highere1
Value
72.6 %e1
Comparator
DDe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield components of wheat plants were studied in a glasshouse pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–507 · show in text ↑
e1

“Relative contribution of post‐anthesis photosynthesis to dry matter formation in grain was higher in WW treatment (72.6 %) than DD (68.5 %) and DW (68.2 %) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rate, gas exchange and transpiration of wheat decreased under drought.

Treatment
drought applicationse2
Outcome
Photosynthetic rate, gas exchange and transpiratione1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield components of wheat plants were studied in a glasshouse pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–507 · show in text ↑
e1

“Photosynthetic rate, gas exchange and transpiration decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1334 · show in text ↑
e2

“leaf (photosynthetic) and plant level WUE increased with drought applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1420 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf and plant-level water-use efficiency of wheat increased under drought.

Treatment
drought applicationse2
Outcome
leaf (photosynthetic) and plant level WUEe2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield components of wheat plants were studied in a glasshouse pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–507 · show in text ↑
e2

“leaf (photosynthetic) and plant level WUE increased with drought applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1420 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All these parameters of wheat were rapidly and completely reversed by rewatering.

Treatment
rewateringe1
Outcome
all these parameterse1
Direction
reversede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield components of wheat plants were studied in a glasshouse pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–507 · show in text ↑
e1

“all these parameters were rapidly and completely reversed by rewatering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rewatering of wheat subjected to drought at stem elongation increased the partitioning of dry weight to grain.

Treatment
rewatering of wheat plants subjected to drought during stem elongation phasee1
Outcome
partitioning of dry weight to graine1
Direction
increasese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield components of wheat plants were studied in a glasshouse pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–507 · show in text ↑
e1

“partitioning of dry weight to grain increases with rewatering of wheat plants subjected to drought during stem elongation phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1656 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The relative contributions of stem reserve remobilization and post-anthesis photosynthesis to grain did not change in wheat.

Organ / stage
stem reservese1
Outcome
relative contributions of remobilization of stem reservese1
Direction
did not changee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield components of wheat plants were studied in a glasshouse pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–507 · show in text ↑
e1

“the relative contributions of remobilization of stem reserves and post‐anthesis photosynthesis to grain did not change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rewatering of wheat at booting after drought gave full recovery of photosynthesis and WUE.

Treatment
rewatering of plants at booting stage after a drought periode1
Outcome
photosynthesis and WUEe1
Direction
full recoverye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield components of wheat plants were studied in a glasshouse pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–507 · show in text ↑
e1

“rewatering of plants at booting stage after a drought period lead to full recovery in photosynthesis and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1900 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rewatering at booting after drought gave a significant but partial recovery of yield components of wheat.

Treatment
rewatering of plants at booting stage after a drought periode2
Outcome
yield componentse1
Direction
partial recoverye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield components of wheat plants were studied in a glasshouse pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–507 · show in text ↑
e1

“a significant although partial recovery of yield components, such as grain yield, TGW and harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1907–2010 · show in text ↑
e2

“rewatering of plants at booting stage after a drought period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1852 · show in text ↑

rewatering · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

rewatering · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

rewatering · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

206 papers: 60 positive, 146 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 146 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

202 papers more in this group

See all 206 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

246 papers: 41 positive, 205 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

242 papers more in this group

See all 246 papers →

drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

431 papers: 86 positive, 345 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 343 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

427 papers more in this group

See all 431 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 537 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.