Paper · 1985 · Annals of Botany

Effect of Drought on Metabolism and Partitioning of Carbon in Two Wheat Varieties Differing in Drought-tolerance

MARC E. NICOLAS; HANS LAMBERS; RICHARD J. SIMPSON; et al.

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
98
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A model was constructed to describe the partitioning of carbon on the third and seventh day from anthesis for well-watered and droughted plants of two wheat varieties (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Warigal and Condor). The glasshouse-grown plants were detillered so that a simplified model could be derived for the main stem. The 9-d drought treatment, imposed just after anthesis during the period of cell division in the grains, reduced grain yield by 18 per cent in Warigal and 30 per cent in Condor. Net carbon fixation was up to 60 per cent higher in Warigal than Condor towards the end of the drought period and this correlated with better osmotic adjustment in the flag leaf. Carbon partitioning between plant organs responded to water deficit more rapidly than net carbon fixation. On day 3, carbon allocation to the roots of droughted plants was maintained in Condor and increased by 14 per cent in Warigal, whereas carbon allocation to the ear decreased in both varieties. However the roots did not compete well with the ear when the water deficit became more severe. Warigal accumulated 3 times more stem reserves than Condor under drought. In the roots, the pattern of carbon allocation between respiration and carbon accumulation changed soon after imposition of drought. Although total root respiration decreased under drought it became more energy efficient, particularly for Warigal, as less respiration took place via the alternative pathway. On day 3, the larger carbon allocation to the roots and the lower root respiration accounted for the 4-times larger sugar accumulation in droughted roots of Warigal compared with those of Condor. Osmotic adjustment in mature leaves and roots may be of importance for the maintenance of vital processes and for recovery after drought.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 9-day drought reduced grain yield by 18% in Warigal.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Material
Warigale1
Treatment
9-d drought treatmente1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
reducede1
Value
18 per cente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triticum aestivum L. cv. Warigal and Condor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–211 · show in text ↑
e1

“The 9-d drought treatment, imposed just after anthesis during the period of cell division in the grains, reduced grain yield by 18 per cent in Warigal and 30 per cent in Condor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–497 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 9-day drought reduced grain yield by 30% in Condor.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Material
Condore1
Treatment
9-d drought treatmente1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
reducede1
Value
30 per cente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triticum aestivum L. cv. Warigal and Condor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–211 · show in text ↑
e1

“The 9-d drought treatment, imposed just after anthesis during the period of cell division in the grains, reduced grain yield by 18 per cent in Warigal and 30 per cent in Condor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–497 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net carbon fixation was higher in Warigal than in Condor towards the end of drought.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Material
Warigale2
Outcome
Net carbon fixatione2
Direction
highere2
Value
up to 60 per cente2
Qualifier
towards the end of the drought periode2
Comparator
Condore2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triticum aestivum L. cv. Warigal and Condor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–211 · show in text ↑
e2

“Net carbon fixation was up to 60 per cent higher in Warigal than Condor towards the end of the drought period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–608 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Better osmotic adjustment in the flag leaf correlated with the net carbon fixation difference under drought.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
flag leafe3
Outcome
osmotic adjustmente3
Direction
bettere3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triticum aestivum L. cv. Warigal and Condor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–211 · show in text ↑
e3

“this correlated with better osmotic adjustment in the flag leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–676 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon partitioning between plant organs responded to water deficit more rapidly than net carbon fixation.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Outcome
Carbon partitioning between plant organse4
Qualifier
responded to water deficit more rapidly than net carbon fixatione4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triticum aestivum L. cv. Warigal and Condor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–211 · show in text ↑
e4

“Carbon partitioning between plant organs responded to water deficit more rapidly than net carbon fixation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–783 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On day 3 of drought, carbon allocation to the roots was maintained in Condor.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Material
Condore5
Outcome
carbon allocation to the rootse5
Direction
maintainede5
Qualifier
On day 3e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triticum aestivum L. cv. Warigal and Condor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–211 · show in text ↑
e5

“On day 3, carbon allocation to the roots of droughted plants was maintained in Condor and increased by 14 per cent in Warigal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–910 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On day 3 of drought, carbon allocation to the roots increased by 14% in Warigal.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Material
Warigale5
Outcome
carbon allocation to the rootse5
Direction
increasede5
Value
14 per cente5
Qualifier
On day 3e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triticum aestivum L. cv. Warigal and Condor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–211 · show in text ↑
e5

“On day 3, carbon allocation to the roots of droughted plants was maintained in Condor and increased by 14 per cent in Warigal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–910 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon allocation to the ear decreased under drought in both varieties.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Outcome
carbon allocation to the eare6
Direction
decreasede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triticum aestivum L. cv. Warigal and Condor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–211 · show in text ↑
e6

“whereas carbon allocation to the ear decreased in both varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–976 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots did not compete well with the ear when the water deficit became more severe.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Outcome
compete well with the eare7
Direction
did not compete welle7
Qualifier
when the water deficit became more severee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triticum aestivum L. cv. Warigal and Condor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–211 · show in text ↑
e7

“the roots did not compete well with the ear when the water deficit became more severe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1071 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warigal accumulated 3 times more stem reserves than Condor under drought.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Material
Warigale1
Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
stem reservese1
Direction
accumulated 3 times moree1
Value
3 timese1
Comparator
Condore1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triticum aestivum L. cv. Warigal and Condor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–211 · show in text ↑
e1

“Warigal accumulated 3 times more stem reserves than Condor under drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total root respiration decreased under drought.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
total root respiratione1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triticum aestivum L. cv. Warigal and Condor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–211 · show in text ↑
e1

“Although total root respiration decreased under drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1335 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root respiration became more energy efficient under drought, particularly in Warigal.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Material
Warigale1
Outcome
energy efficiente1
Direction
more energy efficiente1
Qualifier
as less respiration took place via the alternative pathwaye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triticum aestivum L. cv. Warigal and Condor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–211 · show in text ↑
e1

“it became more energy efficient, particularly for Warigal, as less respiration took place via the alternative pathway”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar accumulation in droughted roots was 4 times larger in Warigal than in Condor.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Material
Warigale1
Organ / stage
rootse1
Treatment
droughtede1
Outcome
sugar accumulation in droughted rootse1
Direction
largere1
Value
4-timese1
Comparator
Condore1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triticum aestivum L. cv. Warigal and Condor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–211 · show in text ↑
e1

“the larger carbon allocation to the roots and the lower root respiration accounted for the 4-times larger sugar accumulation in droughted roots of Warigal compared with those of Condor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1649 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Larger carbon allocation to roots and lower root respiration may explain the sugar accumulation in droughted roots of Warigal.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Outcome
sugar accumulation in droughted rootse1
Qualifier
the larger carbon allocation to the roots and the lower root respiratione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triticum aestivum L. cv. Warigal and Condor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–211 · show in text ↑
e1

“the larger carbon allocation to the roots and the lower root respiration accounted for the 4-times larger sugar accumulation in droughted roots of Warigal compared with those of Condor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1649 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotic adjustment in mature leaves and roots may be important for maintaining vital processes and recovery after drought.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
mature leaves and rootse1
Outcome
maintenance of vital processese1
Qualifier
Osmotic adjustment in mature leaves and rootse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triticum aestivum L. cv. Warigal and Condor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–211 · show in text ↑
e1

“Osmotic adjustment in mature leaves and roots may be of importance for the maintenance of vital processes and for recovery after drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1651–1787 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.