Paper · 2002 · Lanzhou University Institutional Repository

Response of Growth and Water Use Efficiency of Spring Wheat to Whole Season CO_2 Enrichment and Drought

Dong Wu

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Whole-growing season pot experiments were conducted to examine the response of growth and water use efficiency ( WUE) of spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Gaoyuan 602) to CO2 enrichment. Wheat plants were grown in open-top chambers (OTCs) subject to two concentrations of CO2 ( [CO2 ]) ( 350 and 700 muL/L, hereafter "ambient" and "elevated" respectively) and three soil water levels (80%, 60% and 40% field water capacity ( FWC), hereafter "high soil moisture", 11 medium soil moisture" and "low soil moisture" respectively). Elevated CO2 greatly increased leaf net photosynthesis ( Pn) at all three soil water levels. The Pn of plants growing under elevated [CO2] was 22 % lower than that of plants growing at ambient [ CO2] when measured with the same [CO2] (700 muL/L). Plant growth was enhanced by elevated [CO2] throughout the growing season, with an increase of 14.8% in shoot dry weight at harvest under high soil moisture, and leaf area was increased by about 20 % at all three soil water levels. Elevated [CO2] in combination with high soil moisture increased the ratio of plant shoot dry weight to height by 15.7%, while this ratio was decreased by over 50 % when plants were subject to drought. Elevated [CO2] also increased the water use efficiency of wheat, mainly due to decreases in transpiration and cumulative consumption of water, and an increase in shoot dry weight, with the biggest value of 30% occurring at high soil water moisture level. Compared to high soil moisture, drought decreased shoot dry weight by 72% under ambient [CO2], and by 76% under elevated [ CO2] Similarly, drought also reduced WUE by 19 % under ambient [ CO2 ], and 23 % under elevated [ CO2] Our results indicate that: (1) elevated [CO2] can increase the photosynthetic rates, g:rowth and WUE of wheat plants; (2) long-term exposure to high [CO2] may result in lower photosynthetic capacity; (3) high [CO2] stimulates plants lateral growth more than vertical growth; (4) the effects Of CO2 enrichment on plants depend on soil water status, with plants benefiting more from CO2 enrichment if sufficient water is supplied; and (5) drought may cause relatively more reduction in plant g:rowth and WUE under future elevated [ CO2] conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased net photosynthesis at all three water levels.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Elevated CO2e0
Outcome
leaf net photosynthesis ( Pn)e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
all three soil water levelse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“Elevated CO2 greatly increased leaf net photosynthesis ( Pn) at all three soil water levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–624 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At common 700 muL/L measurement CO2, Pn was 22 % lower after elevated growth CO2 than after ambient CO2.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
Pne0
Direction
lowere0
Value
22 %e0
Qualifier
same [CO2] (700 muL/L)e0
Comparator
ambient [ CO2]e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“The Pn of plants growing under elevated [CO2] was 22 % lower than that of plants growing at ambient [ CO2] when measured with the same [CO2] (700 muL/L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–778 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased shoot dry weight at harvest by 14.8% under high moisture.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
14.8%e0
Qualifier
high soil moisturee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plant growth was enhanced by elevated [CO2] throughout the growing season, with an increase of 14.8% in shoot dry weight at harvest under high soil moisture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–936 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased leaf area about 20 % at all water levels.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20 %e0
Qualifier
all three soil water levelse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“leaf area was increased by about 20 % at all three soil water levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1010 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 with high moisture increased shoot dry weight to height ratio by 15.7%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Elevated [CO2] in combination with high soil moisturee0
Outcome
ratio of plant shoot dry weight to heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“Elevated [CO2] in combination with high soil moisture increased the ratio of plant shoot dry weight to height by 15.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased shoot dry weight to height ratio over 50 %.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
ratio of plant shoot dry weight to heighte1
Direction
decreasede0
Value
over 50 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“this ratio was decreased by over 50 % when plants were subject to drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1211 · show in text ↑
e1

“ratio of plant shoot dry weight to height by 15.7%, while this ratio was decreased by over 50 % when plants were subject to drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1211 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased wheat WUE, with the biggest value of 30% at high moisture.

Treatment
Elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
30%e0
Qualifier
high soil water moisture levele0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated [CO2] also increased the water use efficiency of wheat, mainly due to decreases in transpiration and cumulative consumption of water, and an increase in shoot dry weight, with the biggest value of 30% occurring at high soil water moisture level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1466 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 reduced transpiration and cumulative water consumption.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
transpiration and cumulative consumption of watere0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“decreases in transpiration and cumulative consumption of water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1354 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced shoot dry weight by 72% under ambient CO2.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
72%e0
Qualifier
ambient [CO2]e0
Comparator
high soil moisturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared to high soil moisture, drought decreased shoot dry weight by 72% under ambient [CO2]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1561 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced shoot dry weight by 76% under elevated CO2.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
shoot dry weighte1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
76%e0
Qualifier
elevated [ CO2]e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“by 76% under elevated [ CO2]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1567–1595 · show in text ↑
e1

“drought decreased shoot dry weight by 72% under ambient [CO2], and by 76% under elevated [ CO2]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced WUE by 19 % under ambient CO2.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
19 %e0
Qualifier
ambient [ CO2 ]e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“drought also reduced WUE by 19 % under ambient [ CO2 ]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1607–1661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced WUE by 23 % under elevated CO2.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
23 %e0
Qualifier
elevated [ CO2]e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“drought also reduced WUE by 19 % under ambient [ CO2 ], and 23 % under elevated [ CO2]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1607–1693 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

42 papers: 38 positive, 4 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

soil water · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 18 positive, 13 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 69 positive, 28 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

co2 · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 124 positive, 21 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

206 papers: 60 positive, 146 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

202 papers more in this group

See all 206 papers →

drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

431 papers: 86 positive, 345 negative or no effect

344 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

427 papers more in this group

See all 431 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.