Abstract
The experiment was carried out under greenhouse conditions to evaluate the effects of macronutrient omission, nutritional status, and development on peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), as well to describe nutritional deficiency symptoms. The experiment was arranged in a completely randomized design with three replications and seven treatments, corresponding to a complete nutritive solution and individual omission of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, and S. The peanut plants cultivar Runner IAC 886 were grown in a Hoagland & Arnon nutrient solution in 5dm 3 pots. Plant height, stem diameter, leaves number, SPAD index, dry mass of aerial part, root, and hole plant, as well the nutritional disorder description were evaluated. The omission of K, Ca, N, P and Mg showed the higher growth limiter to the peanut growth, reducing considerably the plant height, stem diameter, number of leaves and also reducing the peanut dry mass production. Nutritional deficiency symptoms of each nutrient were observed. Macronutrient levels observed in peanut plants were, respectively to the control and to the treatment with nutrient omission were: N = 19.0 - 12.2, P = 4.07 - 1.1, K = 27.9 - 4.7, Ca = 10.4 - 1.6, Mg = 6.2 - 0.96, S = 1.2 - 0.7 g kg-1.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Omission of K, Ca, N, P and Mg substantially limited peanut growth and reduced height, stem diameter, leaf number and dry mass.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- omission of K, Ca, N, P and Mge0
- Outcome
- plant height, stem diameter, number of leavese0
- Direction
- reducinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The omission of K, Ca, N, P and Mg showed the higher growth limiter to the peanut growth, reducing considerably the plant height, stem diameter, number of leaves and also reducing the peanut dry mass production.”
Claim · model-written summary
Each macronutrient omission produced nutritional deficiency symptoms.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Outcome
- Nutritional deficiency symptomse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nutritional deficiency symptoms of each nutrient were observed.”
t0“peanut plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant N levels were 19.0 in controls and 12.2 under omission.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“N = 19.0 - 12.2”
t0“peanut plants”
e1“Macronutrient levels observed in peanut plants were, respectively to the control and to the treatment with nutrient omission were:”
The same questions in other papers
magnesium atom · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
calcium atom · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →nitrogen · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →phosphorus · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
42 papers more in this group
See all 46 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.