Abstract
Field experiment was conducted on sandy loam soil during rabi season 2007–08 at College of Agriculture, Gwalior to assess the response of cabbage cultivar to different levels of nitrogen and sulphur on growth, yield, and quality. nitrogen application 150 kg/ha and sulphur application 60 kg/ha produced significantly higher plants height, plant spread, stem diameter, width of head, higher weight of head per plant and yield of cabbage. Sulphur application 80 kg/ha contributed significantly more protein percentage over rest of the applications of sulphur. The maximum yield recorded under treatment combination 150 kg N/ha and 60 kg S/ha.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen at 150 kg/ha significantly increased cabbage height, spread and stem diameter.
- Taxon
- cabbage
Brassica oleracea var. capitatae0 - Treatment
- nitrogen application 150 kg/hae0
- Outcome
- plants height, plant spread, stem diametere0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“nitrogen application 150 kg/ha and sulphur application 60 kg/ha produced significantly higher plants height, plant spread, stem diameter, width of head, higher weight of head per plant and yield of cabbage.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur at 60 kg/ha significantly increased cabbage head width, head weight and yield.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae0
- Treatment
- sulphur application 60 kg/hae0
- Outcome
- width of head, higher weight of head per plant and yield of cabbagee0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“nitrogen application 150 kg/ha and sulphur application 60 kg/ha produced significantly higher plants height, plant spread, stem diameter, width of head, higher weight of head per plant and yield of cabbage.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur at 80 kg/ha increased protein percentage significantly over other sulphur applications.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatat0
- Treatment
- Sulphur application 80 kg/hae0
- Outcome
- protein percentagee0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- rest of the applications of sulphure0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sulphur application 80 kg/ha contributed significantly more protein percentage over rest of the applications of sulphur.”
t0“cabbage”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest cabbage yield occurred at 150 kg N/ha plus 60 kg S/ha.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatat0
- Treatment
- 150 kg N/ha and 60 kg S/hae0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum yield recorded under treatment combination 150 kg N/ha and 60 kg S/ha.”
t0“cabbage”
The same questions in other papers
sulfur atom · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →sulfur atom · quality: protein · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
nitrogen · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ
143 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
160 papers more in this group
See all 164 papers →nitrogen · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
99 papers more in this group
See all 103 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.