Paper · 2008 · Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo

The effect of nitrogen and sulphur fertilization on yield and quality of kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea, L.)

Tomáš Losák; Jaroslav Hlušek; Stanislav Kráěmar; et al.

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In a greenhouse pot experiment with kohlrabi, variety Luna, we explored the joint effect of N (0.6 g N per pot = 6 kg of soil) and S in the soil (25-35-45 mg kg-1 of S) on yields, on N, S and NO3- content in tubers and leaves, and on alterations in the amino acids concentration in the tubers. S fertilisation had no effect on tuber yields. The ranges of N content in tubers and leaves were narrow (between 1.42-1.48 % N and 1.21-1.35 % N, respectively) and the effect of S fertilisation was insignificant. S concentration in the tubers ranged between 0.59 and 0.64 % S. S fertilisation had a more pronounced effect on the S concentration in leaf tissues where it increased from 0.50 to 0.58 or to 0.76 % S under the applied dose. The NO3- content was higher in tubers than in leaves. Increasing the S level in the soil significantly reduced NO3- concentrations in the tubers by 42.2-53.6 % and in the leaves by 8.8-21.7 %. Increasing the S content in the soil reduced the concentration of cysteine + methionine by 16-28 %. The values of valine, tyrosine, aspartic acid and serine were constant. In the S0, S1, and S2 treatments the levels of threonine, isoleucine, leucine, arginine, the sum of essential amino acids and alanine decreased from 37 to 9 %. The histidine concentration increased with increasing S fertilisation. S fertilisation of kohlrabi can be recommended to stabilize the yield and reduce the undesirable NO3- contained in the parts used for consumption.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur fertilization had no effect on kohlrabi tuber yield.

Treatment
S fertilisatione0
Outcome
tuber yieldse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes
Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes · TaxonToubib at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S fertilisation had no effect on tuber yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–340 · show in text ↑
t0

“kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur fertilization had an insignificant effect on nitrogen content in tubers and leaves.

Treatment
S fertilisatione0
Outcome
N content in tubers and leavese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes
Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes · TaxonToubib at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ranges of N content in tubers and leaves were narrow (between 1.42-1.48 % N and 1.21-1.35 % N, respectively) and the effect of S fertilisation was insignificant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–506 · show in text ↑
t0

“kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur concentration in tubers ranged from 0.59 to 0.64%.

Outcome
S concentration in the tuberse0
Value
0.59 and 0.64 % Se0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes
Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes · TaxonToubib at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S concentration in the tubers ranged between 0.59 and 0.64 % S.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–570 · show in text ↑
t0

“kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur fertilization increased sulfur concentration in leaf tissue.

Treatment
S fertilisatione0
Outcome
S concentration in leaf tissuese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.50 to 0.58 or to 0.76 % Se0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes
Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes · TaxonToubib at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S fertilisation had a more pronounced effect on the S concentration in leaf tissues where it increased from 0.50 to 0.58 or to 0.76 % S under the applied dose.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–730 · show in text ↑
t0

“kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate content was higher in tubers than leaves.

Organ / stage
tuberse0
Outcome
NO3- contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes
Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes · TaxonToubib at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The NO3- content was higher in tubers than in leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–784 · show in text ↑
t0

“kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing soil sulfur significantly reduced tuber nitrate concentration by 42.2-53.6%.

Treatment
Increasing the S level in the soile0
Outcome
NO3- concentrations in the tuberse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
42.2-53.6 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes
Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes · TaxonToubib at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the S level in the soil significantly reduced NO3- concentrations in the tubers by 42.2-53.6 % and in the leaves by 8.8-21.7 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–923 · show in text ↑
t0

“kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing soil sulfur significantly reduced leaf nitrate concentration by 8.8-21.7%.

Treatment
Increasing the S level in the soile0
Outcome
in the leavese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
8.8-21.7 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes
Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes · TaxonToubib at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the S level in the soil significantly reduced NO3- concentrations in the tubers by 42.2-53.6 % and in the leaves by 8.8-21.7 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–923 · show in text ↑
t0

“kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing soil sulfur reduced cysteine plus methionine concentration by 16-28%.

Treatment
Increasing the S content in the soile0
Outcome
concentration of cysteine + methioninee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
16-28 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes
Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes · TaxonToubib at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the S content in the soil reduced the concentration of cysteine + methionine by 16-28 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Valine, tyrosine, aspartic acid and serine concentrations remained constant.

Outcome
values of valine, tyrosine, aspartic acide0
Direction
constante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes
Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes · TaxonToubib at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The values of valine, tyrosine, aspartic acid and serine were constant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Threonine, isoleucine and leucine levels decreased by 37 to 9% across S0, S1 and S2 treatments.

Treatment
S0, S1, and S2 treatmentse0
Outcome
levels of threonine, isoleucine, leucinee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
37 to 9 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes
Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes · TaxonToubib at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the S0, S1, and S2 treatments the levels of threonine, isoleucine, leucine, arginine, the sum of essential amino acids and alanine decreased from 37 to 9 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arginine, total essential amino acids and alanine decreased across S0, S1 and S2 treatments.

Treatment
S0, S1, and S2 treatmentse0
Outcome
arginine, the sum of essential amino acids and alaninee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
37 to 9 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes
Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes · TaxonToubib at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the S0, S1, and S2 treatments the levels of threonine, isoleucine, leucine, arginine, the sum of essential amino acids and alanine decreased from 37 to 9 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Histidine concentration increased with sulfur fertilization.

Treatment
increasing S fertilisatione0
Outcome
histidine concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes
Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes · TaxonToubib at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The histidine concentration increased with increasing S fertilisation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–105 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend sulfur fertilization to stabilize yield and reduce nitrate in edible kohlrabi parts.

Treatment
S fertilisatione0
Outcome
stabilize the yield and reduce the undesirable NO3-e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes
Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes · TaxonToubib at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S fertilisation of kohlrabi can be recommended to stabilize the yield and reduce the undesirable NO3- contained in the parts used for consumption.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1473 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

146 papers: 127 positive, 19 negative or no effect

126 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

142 papers more in this group

See all 146 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

496 papers: 445 positive, 51 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 445 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

492 papers more in this group

See all 496 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.