Paper · 2021 · Baghdad Science Journal

Effects of Nitrogen and Sulfur Sprays on the Growth and Production of Broccoli Brassica Oleracea var. Italica L.

Mushtak F. Karomi Kisko; Nabil Jwad Kadhum; Zainab Anwar Ali; et al.

6
claims
18
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In order to achieve optimal plant growth and production, essential nutrients must be readily available in adequate quantities and in a balanced proportion to give a good yield, especially broccoli which has health benefits that may not be found in many other plants. For this purpose, this experiment was carried out during the seasons 2019/2020 in the botanical garden of the Department of Biology, College of Science for Women, University of Baghdad, to study the effects of nitrogen and sulphur and their interaction on eight parameters reflecting the overall traits of vegetative growth, yield, and chlorophyll content of broccoli Brassica oleracea L. (var. italic JASSMINE F1 Hybrid). A factorial design with three replicates was used, each with 7 plants treated via foliar spraying. The first factor included three groups; control N0 (distill water spray), N1 (500 mg.l-1 nitrogen), and N2 (1000 mg.l-1 nitrogen). The second factor also included three groups; control S0 (distill water spray), S1 (500 mg.l-1 sulfur), and S2 (1000 mg.l-1 sulfur). We used Urea (CO(NH2)2) as a nitrogen source and zinc sulphate (ZnSO4) as a sulfur source. As for the treatment with nitrogen, the results revealed that N2 treatment caused the significantly highest values in all the studied traits, except for the plant height, where there was no significant difference between N1 and N2. As related to the treatment with sulphur, the results showed that S2 treatment resulted in the significantly highest values of leave area, leave dry weight, and root fresh weight. S2 also caused the highest values, but with no significant differences, of plant height, stem diameter and chlorophyll content index. S1 treatment, on the other hand, caused insignificantly higher values of leave number per plant and main curd weight. Based on the results of the interaction between nitrogen and sulfur, S1N2 treatment resulted in the significantly highest values as compared to all other treatments of all the studied traits, except for the plant height, root fresh weight, and main curd weight. The results presented here may facilitate improvements of Broccoli cultivation with suitable nutrient concentrations for sustainable agriculture. In conclusion, the present study comes up with the following: nitrogen and sulfur and their interaction enhance significantly the growth and production of broccoli.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N2 gave significantly highest values for studied traits apart from height.

Material
JASSMINE F1 Hybride0e1e2e3
Treatment
N2 (1000 mg.l-1 nitrogen)e0e1e2e3
Outcome
all the studied traits, except for the plant heighte0e1e2e3
Direction
higheste0e1e2e3
Comparator
control N0 (distill water spray)e0e1e2e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N2 treatment caused the significantly highest values in all the studied traits, except for the plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1313 · show in text ↑
e1

“N2 (1000 mg.l-1 nitrogen)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–918 · show in text ↑
e2

“control N0 (distill water spray)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–861 · show in text ↑
e3

“vegetative growth, yield, and chlorophyll content of broccoli Brassica oleracea L. (var. italic JASSMINE F1 Hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Height did not differ significantly between N1 and N2.

Treatment
N1e0e1e2
Outcome
plant heighte0e1e2
Direction
no significant differencee0e1e2
Comparator
N2e0e1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant difference between N1 and N2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1374 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant height, where there was no significant difference between N1 and N2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1374 · show in text ↑
e2

“broccoli Brassica oleracea L. (var. italic JASSMINE F1 Hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

S2 significantly maximized leaf area, leaf dry weight and root fresh weight.

Treatment
S2 (1000 mg.l-1 sulfur)e0e1e2
Outcome
leave area, leave dry weight, and root fresh weighte0e1e2
Direction
higheste0e1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S2 treatment resulted in the significantly highest values of leave area, leave dry weight, and root fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1554 · show in text ↑
e1

“S2 (1000 mg.l-1 sulfur)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1051 · show in text ↑
e2

“broccoli Brassica oleracea L. (var. italic JASSMINE F1 Hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

S2 gave nonsignificantly highest plant height, stem diameter and chlorophyll index.

Treatment
S2 (1000 mg.l-1 sulfur)e0e1e2
Outcome
plant height, stem diameter and chlorophyll content indexe0e1e2
Direction
higheste0e1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S2 also caused the highest values, but with no significant differences, of plant height, stem diameter and chlorophyll content index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1688 · show in text ↑
e1

“S2 (1000 mg.l-1 sulfur)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1051 · show in text ↑
e2

“broccoli Brassica oleracea L. (var. italic JASSMINE F1 Hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

S1 gave insignificantly higher leaf number and curd weight.

Treatment
S1 (500 mg.l-1 sulfur)e0e1e2
Outcome
leave number per plant and main curd weighte0e1e2
Direction
highere0e1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S1 treatment, on the other hand, caused insignificantly higher values of leave number per plant and main curd weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1806 · show in text ↑
e1

“S1 (500 mg.l-1 sulfur)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1022 · show in text ↑
e2

“broccoli Brassica oleracea L. (var. italic JASSMINE F1 Hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

S1N2 had significantly highest studied traits except plant height, root fresh weight and curd weight.

Treatment
S1N2e0e1
Outcome
all the studied traits, except for the plant height, root fresh weight, and main curd weighte0e1
Direction
higheste0e1
Comparator
all other treatmentse0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S1N2 treatment resulted in the significantly highest values as compared to all other treatments of all the studied traits, except for the plant height, root fresh weight, and main curd weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1877–2068 · show in text ↑
e1

“broccoli Brassica oleracea L. (var. italic JASSMINE F1 Hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–688 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

sulfur atom · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

sulfur atom · physiology: pigments · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 90 positive, 13 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.