Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during 1999 and 2000 to evaluate the effect of integrated nutrient manage ment with 4 levels of N and 3 integrating factors (bio fertilizer, enriched farmyard manure and composted coirpith) for groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) horsegram [Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam) Verdc.] cropping sequence under rainfed condition in a red loamy sand soil. The use of composted coirpith provided better nutritional environment in the soil for groundnut and also the residual horsegram crop. The 75 and 100% soil test based levels of N along with composted coirpith rated better, accounting for higher yields in both the crops. The uptake also was more with IV level of 75% and beyond, irrespective of the integrating factors. . .. Key words : Integrated nutrient management, Soil test based N, Composted Groundnut horsegram, coirpith, Biofertilizer, Enriched FYM
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Composted coirpith improved the soil nutritional environment for groundnut.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- composted coirpithe0
- Outcome
- nutritional environment in the soil for groundnute0
- Direction
- bettere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The use of composted coirpith provided better nutritional environment in the soil for groundnut and also the residual horsegram crop.”
Claim · model-written summary
Composted coirpith improved the soil nutritional environment for the residual horsegram crop.
- Taxon
- horsegram
Macrotyloma uniflorume0 - Treatment
- composted coirpithe0
- Outcome
- nutritional environment in the soile0
- Direction
- bettere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The use of composted coirpith provided better nutritional environment in the soil for groundnut and also the residual horsegram crop.”
Claim · model-written summary
The 75 and 100% soil test based N levels with composted coirpith gave higher yields in groundnut.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- 75 and 100% soil test based levels of N along with composted coirpithe1
- Outcome
- yieldse1
- Direction
- highere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“soil for groundnut and also the residual horsegram crop.”
e1“The 75 and 100% soil test based levels of N along with composted coirpith rated better, accounting for higher yields in both the crops.”
Claim · model-written summary
The 75 and 100% soil test based N levels with composted coirpith gave higher yields in horsegram.
- Taxon
- horsegramMacrotyloma uniflorume0
- Treatment
- 75 and 100% soil test based levels of N along with composted coirpithe1
- Outcome
- yieldse1
- Direction
- highere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the residual horsegram crop.”
e1“The 75 and 100% soil test based levels of N along with composted coirpith rated better, accounting for higher yields in both the crops.”
Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient uptake was greater at the 75% level and above regardless of integrating factor.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- IV level of 75% and beyonde1
- Outcome
- uptakee1
- Direction
- moree1
- Qualifier
- irrespective of the integrating factorse1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“soil for groundnut and also the residual horsegram crop.”
e1“The uptake also was more with IV level of 75% and beyond, irrespective of the integrating factors.”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
679 papers more in this group
See all 683 papers →fertilization · yield · Macrotyloma uniflorum (horse gram)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.