Paper · 2013 · Agritrop (Cirad)

Vinasse enhances sugarcane roots in a sandy Brazilian soil.

Raffaella Rossetto; André César Vitti; F.L.F. Dias; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In Brazil, liquid residues (vinasse) from ethanol production are commonly used as fertigation for sugarcane cultivation. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of vinasse application on sugarcane root density and rooting depth. A 2-year field experiment was conducted using three vinasse fertigation treatments, with 3 replications, as follows: Year 1 - control (no vinasse, dose 0), 140 m3 vinasse per ha (dose 1), and 280 m3 per ha (dose 2) and Year 2 - control, 170 m3 per ha (dose 1), and 340 m3 per ha (dose 2). After 12 months of vinasse application, soil trenches (1.5 m depth by 1.2 m wide) were opened within the sugarcane row to evaluate the root system. A metal grid, (1.5 m × 1.2 m) was fitted in the trenches and root number and density (cm of roots per cm3 of soil) were evaluated and a root system model for each treatment was obtained. Following the sugarcane harvest, vinasse fertigations were continued for the second crop cycle, followed by another root growth evaluation. Since vinasse is a nutrient-containing organic residue, enhanced soil fertility from the vinasse applications influenced root growth and rooting depth, particularly within the soil surface layer. Although a few roots were found below 0.6 m depth, most of the increased root growth with vinasse application was found within the surface 0.3 m soil profile. Relative to the control, root density with dose 2 vinasse fertigation increased by 34% (top 0.1 m soil layer), 122% (0.1 to 0.2 m), and 36% (0.2 to 0.3 m). Year 2 results were similar, with dose 2 fertigation resulting in 128% greater root densities in the 0.2 to 0.3 m soil profile relative to the control. We also found linear correlations between base saturation with soil depth and root number and density. These results indicate that successive fertigations with vinasse promote soil fertility improvements and consequently large and deep root systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vinasse applications enhanced sugarcane root growth and rooting depth, especially near the soil surface.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
vinasse applicationse0
Outcome
root growth and rooting depthe0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
within the soil surface layere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced soil fertility from the vinasse applications influenced root growth and rooting depth, particularly within the soil surface layer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1204 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane root density and rooting depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–244 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most vinasse stimulated sugarcane root growth was in the surface 0.3 m, with few roots below 0.6 m.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
vinasse applicatione0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
within the surface 0.3 m soil profilee0

Verbatim

e0

“Although a few roots were found below 0.6 m depth, most of the increased root growth with vinasse application was found within the surface 0.3 m soil profile”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1363 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane root density and rooting depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dose 2 vinasse increased sugarcane root density by 34% in the top 0.1 m relative to control.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
dose 2 vinasse fertigatione0
Outcome
root densitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
34%e0
Qualifier
top 0.1 m soil layere0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Relative to the control, root density with dose 2 vinasse fertigation increased by 34% (top 0.1 m soil layer), 122% (0.1 to 0.2 m), and 36% (0.2 to 0.3 m)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1519 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane root density and rooting depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dose 2 vinasse increased sugarcane root density by 122% at 0.1 to 0.2 m relative to control.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
dose 2 vinasse fertigatione0
Outcome
root densitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
122%e0
Qualifier
0.1 to 0.2 me0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Relative to the control, root density with dose 2 vinasse fertigation increased by 34% (top 0.1 m soil layer), 122% (0.1 to 0.2 m), and 36% (0.2 to 0.3 m)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1519 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane root density and rooting depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dose 2 vinasse increased sugarcane root density by 36% at 0.2 to 0.3 m relative to control.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
dose 2 vinasse fertigatione0
Outcome
root densitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
36%e0
Qualifier
0.2 to 0.3 me0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Relative to the control, root density with dose 2 vinasse fertigation increased by 34% (top 0.1 m soil layer), 122% (0.1 to 0.2 m), and 36% (0.2 to 0.3 m)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1519 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane root density and rooting depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In year 2, dose 2 vinasse gave 128% greater sugarcane root density at 0.2 to 0.3 m than control.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
dose 2 fertigatione0
Outcome
root densitiese0
Direction
greatere0
Value
128%e0
Qualifier
0.2 to 0.3 m soil profilee0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Year 2 results were similar, with dose 2 fertigation resulting in 128% greater root densities in the 0.2 to 0.3 m soil profile relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1671 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane root density and rooting depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–244 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Base saturation with depth correlated linearly with sugarcane root number and density.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Outcome
root number and densitye0
Qualifier
base saturatione0
Setting
soil depthe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“We also found linear correlations between base saturation with soil depth and root number and density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1774 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane root density and rooting depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–244 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Successive vinasse fertigations are interpreted to improve soil fertility and promote large, deep sugarcane root systems.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
successive fertigations with vinassee0
Outcome
large and deep root systemse0
Qualifier
soil fertility improvementse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“These results indicate that successive fertigations with vinasse promote soil fertility improvements and consequently large and deep root systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1776–1921 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane root density and rooting depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–244 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.