Paper · 2002 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Bio-efticacy of Metsulfuronmethyl in Combination with Isoproturon for Control of Grassy and Non-grassy Weeds in Wheat

Govindra Singh; Mahendra Singh

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted during winter seasons of 1996–97 and 1997–98 to assess the bio-efficacy of metsulfuronmethyl (MSM) in combination with isoproturon for control of grassy and non-grassy weeds in wheat. Results revealed that ready mix formulation of MSM+isoproturon at 6.0+500 g ha−1, 2, 4-D+isoproturon at 500+1000 g ha−1 and isoproturon alone at 1500 g ha−1 significantly reduced the total density of weeds and their dry matter production. Isoproturon at 1.0 lind 1.5 kg ha−1 was more effective than at lower doses applied alone or in combination with 2, 4-D in reducing density of non-grassy weeds, None of the treatments caused any phytotoxic effects on the crop at any stage. Grain yield was consistently higher due to ready mix formulation of MSM+isoproturon at 4.0+1000 g ha−1 and combination of higher doses of 2, 4-D and isoproturon. The carbendazim, urea and monocrotophos as tank mixture with ready mix formulation of MSM+isoproturon at 3.0+750 g ha−1 were compatible.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MSM plus isoproturon at 6.0+500 g ha−1 significantly reduced weed density and dry matter.

Treatment
MSM+isoproturon at 6.0+500 g ha−1e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
total density of weeds and their dry matter productione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ready mix formulation of MSM+isoproturon at 6.0+500 g ha−1, 2, 4-D+isoproturon at 500+1000 g ha−1 and isoproturon alone at 1500 g ha−1 significantly reduced the total density of weeds and their dry matter production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

2, 4-D plus isoproturon at 500+1000 g ha−1 significantly reduced weed density and dry matter.

Treatment
2, 4-D+isoproturon at 500+1000 g ha−1e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
total density of weeds and their dry matter productione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2, 4-D+isoproturon at 500+1000 g ha−1 and isoproturon alone at 1500 g ha−1 significantly reduced the total density of weeds and their dry matter production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon alone at 1500 g ha−1 significantly reduced weed density and dry matter.

Treatment
isoproturon alone at 1500 g ha−1e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
total density of weeds and their dry matter productione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“isoproturon alone at 1500 g ha−1 significantly reduced the total density of weeds and their dry matter production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon at 1.0 and 1.5 kg ha−1 reduced non-grassy weed density more effectively than lower doses.

Treatment
Isoproturon at 1.0 lind 1.5 kg ha−1e0
Interactor
non-grassy weedse0weed
Outcome
density of non-grassy weedse0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
lower dosese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isoproturon at 1.0 lind 1.5 kg ha−1 was more effective than at lower doses applied alone or in combination with 2, 4-D in reducing density of non-grassy weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–612 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No treatment caused crop phytotoxicity at any stage.

Outcome
phytotoxic effects on the crope0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“None of the treatments caused any phytotoxic effects on the crop at any stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–691 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MSM plus isoproturon at 4.0+1000 g ha−1 gave consistently higher grain yield.

Treatment
MSM+isoproturon at 4.0+1000 g ha−1e0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was consistently higher due to ready mix formulation of MSM+isoproturon at 4.0+1000 g ha−1 and combination of higher doses of 2, 4-D and isoproturon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher doses of 2, 4-D and isoproturon gave consistently higher grain yield.

Treatment
higher doses of 2, 4-D and isoproturone0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was consistently higher due to ready mix formulation of MSM+isoproturon at 4.0+1000 g ha−1 and combination of higher doses of 2, 4-D and isoproturon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazim, urea and monocrotophos were compatible as tank mixtures with MSM plus isoproturon.

Treatment
carbendazim, urea and monocrotophos as tank mixture with ready mix formulation of MSM+isoproturon at 3.0+750 g ha−1e0
Outcome
were compatiblee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The carbendazim, urea and monocrotophos as tank mixture with ready mix formulation of MSM+isoproturon at 3.0+750 g ha−1 were compatible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–990 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

2,4-D · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 64 positive, 2 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

isoproturon · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 72 positive, 2 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 132 positive, 2 negative or no effect

131 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 143 positive, 12 negative or no effect

142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.