Paper · 2004 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Mycorrhizae induced hardening of tissue culture raised grape (Vitis vinifera L.) plantlets

Sudhir Kumar Singh; V.B. Patel; A. K. Saxena; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

To minimize large-scale mortality of tissue culture raised grape plantlets during acclimatization, different mycorrhizal fungi viz., Glomus, Gigaspora, Aculospora, Enterophosphora, Scutellospora and a mixed strain were tried as biological hardening agents. Thirty-day-old in vitro rooted grape plantlets of cv. Pusa Seedless showed maximum root colonization with Glomus mossae, while Pusa Urvashi responded best with the mixed strain. Mycorrhizal plantlets were found to be faster in growth and possessed high shoot and root fresh and dry weights. The vines of the treated plants contained higher sugars and phenols, while the leaves had higher chlorophyll. Of the different nutrients analysed, P, Mg and Zn contents in the leaf were significantly higher compared to control. Mycorrhization resulted in higher plantlet survival, i.e. over 85.0% compared to 55.0% in non-mycorrhizal control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa Seedless had maximum root colonization with Glomus mossae.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
Pusa Seedlesse0
Outcome
root colonizatione0
Direction
maximume0

Verbatim

e0

“cv. Pusa Seedless showed maximum root colonization with Glomus mossae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–376 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa Urvashi responded best to the mixed strain.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
Pusa Urvashie0
Treatment
mixed straine0
Outcome
responded beste0

Verbatim

e0

“Pusa Urvashi responded best with the mixed strain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–433 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal plantlets grew faster and had higher fresh and dry shoot and root weights.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Mycorrhizale0
Outcome
growth and possessed high shoot and root fresh and dry weightse0
Direction
fastere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal plantlets were found to be faster in growth and possessed high shoot and root fresh and dry weights.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated vines had higher sugars and phenols.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
treated plantse0
Outcome
sugars and phenolse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The vines of the treated plants contained higher sugars and phenols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated leaves had higher chlorophyll.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
treated plantse1
Outcome
chlorophylle0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the leaves had higher chlorophyll”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“The vines of the treated plants contained higher sugars and phenols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–615 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf P, Mg and Zn contents were significantly higher than control.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Mycorrhizal plantletse1
Outcome
P, Mg and Zn contentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“P, Mg and Zn contents in the leaf were significantly higher compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mycorrhizal plantlets were found to be faster in growth and possessed high shoot and root fresh and dry weights.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–547 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhization increased plantlet survival to over 85.0%, versus 55.0% in controls.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Mycorrhizatione0
Outcome
plantlet survivale0
Direction
highere0
Value
over 85.0%e0
Qualifier
55.0%e0
Comparator
non-mycorrhizal controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhization resulted in higher plantlet survival, i.e. over 85.0% compared to 55.0% in non-mycorrhizal control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · survival · VitisResults differ

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · VitisResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.