Paper · 2001 · Legume Research - An International Journal

SALT STRESS INDYCED CHANGES IN CERTAIN ORGANIC METABOUTES DURING SEEDLING GROWTH OF CHICKPEA

Ajay Singh; R. Singh; S.G. Sharma

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Tolerant (SG-l1 and DHG-84-11) and susceptible (Pusa-256 and Phule G-5) chickpea genotypes were subjected to varied levels of salt stress (0.0,4.0 and 8.0 dS/m) to investigate the biochemical basis of salt stress tolerance in 18-day-old seedlings. The seeds were germinated at different salinity levels and then transferred in sand culture maintaining the respective stress levels. Increase in salt stress resulted in comparatively more accumulation of sugars, starch, proline, phenols and lower portein content in tolerant genotypes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salt stress caused greater accumulation of sugars, starch and proline in tolerant chickpea genotypes.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
tolerant genotypese0
Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
sugars, starch, prolinee0
Direction
more accumulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in salt stress resulted in comparatively more accumulation of sugars, starch, proline, phenols and lower portein content in tolerant genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salt stress caused greater phenol accumulation in tolerant chickpea genotypes.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Material
tolerant genotypese0
Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
phenolse0
Direction
more accumulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in salt stress resulted in comparatively more accumulation of sugars, starch, proline, phenols and lower portein content in tolerant genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salt stress reduced protein content in tolerant chickpea genotypes.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Material
tolerant genotypese0
Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
portein contente0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in salt stress resulted in comparatively more accumulation of sugars, starch, proline, phenols and lower portein content in tolerant genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–92 · show in text ↑

salinity · quality: phytochemicals · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

salinity · physiology: osmolytes · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

salinity · molecular: metabolites · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 2 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.