Paper · 2021 · Botanica Serbica

The effect of salicylic acid and calcium chloride on lipid peroxidation and the scavenging ability on radical of chickpeas (Cicer arietinum) under salt stress

Kobra Mahdavian

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Salinity exerts harmful morphological, physiological, and metabolic effects on plants. This research aimed to evaluate the effect of salicylic acid (SA 0, 0.75 and 1.5 mM) and calcium chloride (CaCl2 0, 50 and 100 mM), singly or in combination, on different morphological and physiological characteristics of chickpeas exposed to salt stress (0, 25 and 75 mM NaCl). The results showed that the addition of SA or Ca alone improved plant behaviour in the presence of NaCl. Also, the shoot and root length, dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoids decreased under salinity, while malondialdehyde (MDA), the inhibition of DPPH radical, anthocyanine, and proline increased. However, the use of SA and Ca combined increased the shoot and root length and the dry weight, ameliorated the chlorophyll, carotenoids, and reducing sugars, and significantly reduced MDA and the inhibition of DPPH radical in the plants. These studies imply that SA and Ca caused a tolerance to NaCl which may be related to the regulation of antioxidative responses. It may also be suggested that a concentration of 1.5 mM salicylic acid and a concentration of 100 mM calcium are the most suitable concentrations to improve the physiological parameters of chickpeas under salinity conditions. Hence, by regulating the antioxidant system, SA and Ca play this role.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity decreased shoot and root length in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
shoot and root lengthe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpeas (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“the shoot and root length, dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoids decreased under salinity, while malondialdehyde (MDA), the inhibition of DPPH radical, anthocyanine, and proline increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity decreased dry weight in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpeas (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“the shoot and root length, dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoids decreased under salinity, while malondialdehyde (MDA), the inhibition of DPPH radical, anthocyanine, and proline increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity decreased chlorophyll and carotenoids in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
chlorophyll and carotenoidse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpeas (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“the shoot and root length, dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoids decreased under salinity, while malondialdehyde (MDA), the inhibition of DPPH radical, anthocyanine, and proline increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity increased malondialdehyde (MDA) in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpeas (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“the shoot and root length, dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoids decreased under salinity, while malondialdehyde (MDA), the inhibition of DPPH radical, anthocyanine, and proline increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity increased the inhibition of DPPH radical in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
the inhibition of DPPH radicale0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpeas (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“the shoot and root length, dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoids decreased under salinity, while malondialdehyde (MDA), the inhibition of DPPH radical, anthocyanine, and proline increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity increased anthocyanine, and proline in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
anthocyanine, and prolinee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpeas (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“the shoot and root length, dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoids decreased under salinity, while malondialdehyde (MDA), the inhibition of DPPH radical, anthocyanine, and proline increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined SA and Ca increased shoot and root length under salt stress.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
SA and Ca combinede0
Outcome
shoot and root lengthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpeas (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“the use of SA and Ca combined increased the shoot and root length and the dry weight, ameliorated the chlorophyll, carotenoids, and reducing sugars, and significantly reduced MDA and the inhibition of DPPH radical in the plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined SA and Ca increased dry weight under salt stress.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
SA and Ca combinede0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpeas (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“the use of SA and Ca combined increased the shoot and root length and the dry weight, ameliorated the chlorophyll, carotenoids, and reducing sugars, and significantly reduced MDA and the inhibition of DPPH radical in the plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined SA and Ca ameliorated chlorophyll, carotenoids, and reducing sugars under salt stress.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
SA and Ca combinede0
Outcome
chlorophyll, carotenoids, and reducing sugarse0
Direction
amelioratede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpeas (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“the use of SA and Ca combined increased the shoot and root length and the dry weight, ameliorated the chlorophyll, carotenoids, and reducing sugars, and significantly reduced MDA and the inhibition of DPPH radical in the plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined SA and Ca reduced MDA under salt stress.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
SA and Ca combinede0
Outcome
MDAe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpeas (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“the use of SA and Ca combined increased the shoot and root length and the dry weight, ameliorated the chlorophyll, carotenoids, and reducing sugars, and significantly reduced MDA and the inhibition of DPPH radical in the plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined SA and Ca reduced the inhibition of DPPH radical under salt stress.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
SA and Ca combinede0
Outcome
the inhibition of DPPH radicale0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpeas (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“the use of SA and Ca combined increased the shoot and root length and the dry weight, ameliorated the chlorophyll, carotenoids, and reducing sugars, and significantly reduced MDA and the inhibition of DPPH radical in the plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA alone improved plant behavior in salt stress.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
plant behavioure0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpeas (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“the addition of SA or Ca alone improved plant behaviour in the presence of NaCl.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ca alone improved plant behavior in salt stress.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Cae0
Outcome
plant behavioure0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpeas (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“the addition of SA or Ca alone improved plant behaviour in the presence of NaCl.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–470 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest 1.5 mM salicylic acid and 100 mM calcium as suitable concentrations under salinity.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinume0
Outcome
1.5 mM salicylic acid and a concentration of 100 mM calciume0
Qualifier
under salinity conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpeas (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“a concentration of 1.5 mM salicylic acid and a concentration of 100 mM calcium are the most suitable concentrations to improve the physiological parameters of chickpeas under salinity conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1259 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: oxidative · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

calcium atom · physiology: oxidative · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

salicylic acid · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

salinity · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

16 papers: 0 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

salinity · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

66 papers: 6 positive, 60 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

salinity · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.