Paper · 2013 · Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (Julius Kühn-Institut)

Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to exogenous salicylic acid and ascorbic acid under vegetative and reproductive drought stress conditions

Rokhzadi, Asad

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Drought stress is considered as a critical limiting factor in plant growth and productivity. Substances such as salicylic acid (SA) and ascorbic acid (AA) may enhance drought tolerance in plants. Therefore this experiment was aimed to study the growth and physiological response of two chickpea cultivars (ILC482 & Kurdistan) to SA and AA foliar application in four different conditions of drought stress including: control or well watered, vegetative drought stress, reproductive drought stress and complete drought stress (vegetative and reproductive drought stress). Results showed that plant biomass was significantly increased through SA and AA application. SA spraying in complete drought stress condition, significantly increased the proline content of leaves. Foliar application of SA and AA both in well watered and water deficit treatments reduced the electrolyte leakage in leaves. Generally it was concluded that SA and AA had the potential of diminishing injurious effects of drought stress and promoting crop productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic and ascorbic acid application significantly increased chickpea biomass.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
SA and AA applicatione0
Outcome
plant biomasse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that plant biomass was significantly increased through SA and AA application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–662 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to exogenous salicylic acid and ascorbic acid under vegetative and reproductive drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid spraying under complete drought significantly increased leaf proline.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
SA sprayinge0
Outcome
proline content of leavese0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
complete drought stress conditione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA spraying in complete drought stress condition, significantly increased the proline content of leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–767 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to exogenous salicylic acid and ascorbic acid under vegetative and reproductive drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar salicylic and ascorbic acid reduced leaf electrolyte leakage in both watering regimes.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Foliar application of SA and AAe0
Outcome
electrolyte leakage in leavese0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
well watered and water deficit treatmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of SA and AA both in well watered and water deficit treatments reduced the electrolyte leakage in leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to exogenous salicylic acid and ascorbic acid under vegetative and reproductive drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–147 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: oxidative · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

ascorbic acid · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: osmolytes · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · physiology: oxidative · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · physiology: osmolytes · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.