Abstract
In order to evaluate the effect of foliar application of salicylic acid (SA) on morphological and physiological responses in chickpea under water deficit stress, a field experiment with four chickpea genotypes at two different irrigation regimes were carried out. Foliar spraying of the plants with distilled water (control) and salicylic acid treatments (0.01, 0.1 and 1 mM) were performed four times at 20, 30, 40 and 50 days after sowing. Water deficit stress significantly reduced yield and yield components. Nevertheless, exogenous SA application significantly improved these attributes under water stress conditions. However, drought stress increased leaf proline and soluble sugar concentration and it was further increased by exogenous application of SA. Water stress significantly reduced leaf chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoid concentrations as compared to well-watered conditions and these were further increased by exogenous application of SA. Exogenously applied SA inhibited or promoted morphological and physiological changes in plants. SA at a concentration of 0.01 mM negatively affected seed yield and its components, while most efficient doses of SA for improving physiological these attributes were 0.1 and 1 mM. The results suggest that application of exogenous SA could help to reduce the adverse effects of drought stress and might have a key role in providing tolerance to stress by promoting growth and accumulation of proline, soluble sugars and photosynthetic pigments in plant leaves.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit significantly reduced chickpea yield and yield components.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume1 - Treatment
- Water deficit stresse0
- Outcome
- yield and yield componentse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- well-watered conditionse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Water deficit stress significantly reduced yield and yield components”
e1“chickpea under water deficit stress”
e2“as compared to well-watered conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
Salicylic acid significantly improved chickpea yield and yield components under water stress.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume2 - Treatment
- exogenous SA applicatione0
- Outcome
- yield and yield componentse1
- Direction
- improvede0
- Qualifier
- under water stress conditionse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“exogenous SA application significantly improved these attributes under water stress conditions”
e1“Water deficit stress significantly reduced yield and yield components”
e2“chickpea under water deficit stress”
Claim · model-written summary
Drought increased chickpea leaf proline and soluble sugar concentration.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume1 - Treatment
- drought stresse0
- Outcome
- leaf proline and soluble sugar concentratione0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“drought stress increased leaf proline and soluble sugar concentration”
e1“chickpea under water deficit stress”
Claim · model-written summary
Exogenous salicylic acid further increased chickpea leaf proline and soluble sugars under drought.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume1 - Treatment
- exogenous application of SAe0
- Outcome
- leaf proline and soluble sugar concentratione0
- Direction
- further increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“drought stress increased leaf proline and soluble sugar concentration and it was further increased by exogenous application of SA”
e1“chickpea under water deficit stress”
Claim · model-written summary
Water stress significantly reduced chickpea leaf chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoid concentrations compared with well-watered conditions.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume1 - Treatment
- Water stresse0
- Outcome
- leaf chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoid concentrationse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- well-watered conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Water stress significantly reduced leaf chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoid concentrations as compared to well-watered conditions”
e1“chickpea under water deficit stress”
Claim · model-written summary
Salicylic acid increased chickpea leaf chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoids under water stress.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume1 - Treatment
- exogenous application of SAe0
- Outcome
- leaf chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoid concentrationse0
- Direction
- further increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“leaf chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoid concentrations as compared to well-watered conditions and these were further increased by exogenous application of SA”
e1“chickpea under water deficit stress”
Claim · model-written summary
Salicylic acid at 0.01 mM negatively affected chickpea seed yield and components.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume1 - Treatment
- SA at a concentration of 0.01 mMe0
- Outcome
- seed yield and its componentse0
- Direction
- negatively affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“SA at a concentration of 0.01 mM negatively affected seed yield and its components”
e1“chickpea under water deficit stress”
Claim · model-written summary
The most efficient salicylic acid doses for improving physiological attributes were 0.1 and 1 mM.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume1 - Treatment
- 0.1 and 1 mMe0
- Outcome
- physiological these attributese0
- Direction
- improvinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“most efficient doses of SA for improving physiological these attributes were 0.1 and 1 mM”
e1“chickpea under water deficit stress”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest exogenous salicylic acid may reduce drought effects by promoting growth and accumulating proline, sugars and pigments.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume1 - Treatment
- application of exogenous SAe0
- Outcome
- reduce the adverse effects of drought stresse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“application of exogenous SA could help to reduce the adverse effects of drought stress and might have a key role in providing tolerance to stress by promoting growth and accumulation of proline, soluble sugars and photosynthetic pigments in plant leaves”
e1“chickpea under water deficit stress”
The same questions in other papers
salicylic acid · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →salicylic acid · physiology: osmolytes · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
salicylic acid · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →drought · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →drought · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.