Paper · 2024 · Frontiers in Agronomy

Enhancing rainfed safflower yield, oil content, and fatty acid composition through intercropping with chickpea and stress-modifier biostimulants

Salah Mosalman; Esmaeil Rezaei-Chiyaneh; Hassan Mahdavikia; et al.

15
claims
19
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of stress modifiers in intercropping systems on seed yield and yield components, physiological traits, and antioxidant activity of safflower ( Carthamus tinctorius L.) and chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) under rainfed (water deficit) conditions. The experimental design included three stress modulator levels [control, 1 mM salicylic acid (SA), and 10 mM selenium (Se)] and five planting patterns [intercropping one row of safflower and two rows of chickpeas (1S:2C), two rows of safflower and four rows of chickpeas (2S:4C), and three rows of safflower and five rows of chickpeas (3S:5C), and sole cropping of safflower (Ss) and chickpea (Cs)]. The results revealed that Ss treated with Se produced the highest safflower biological yield (4,905.50 kg ha −1 ) and seed yield (1,259.50 kg ha −1 ), while Cs produced the highest chickpea biological yield (2,799.67 kg ha −1 ) and seed yield (852.44 kg ha −1 ), followed by Cs treated with SA (2,419.25 kg ha −1 and 764.83 kg ha −1 , respectively). Conversely, the 3S:5C intercropping ratio (IR) with Se application recorded the highest safflower oil content (32.08%), while Ss treated with Se produced the highest oil yield (358.62 kg ha −1 ). The 2S:4C configuration with Se application produced the highest unsaturated fatty acid (oleic and linoleic acids) concentrations in safflower, while 2S:4C and 3S:5C treated with Se produced the highest chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b contents in safflower and chickpea. Furthermore, 1S:2C and 2S:4C treated with SA or Se produced the highest proline and total soluble sugars in safflower and chickpea. The SA and Se treatments in the intercropping systems increased catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase activities compared to the respective control plants (sole cropping) and enhanced oil contents, fatty acid composition, physiological traits, and antioxidant properties. These results underscore the potential of intercropping systems coupled with stress modulator treatments as a sustainable approach for safflower and chickpea cultivation under rainfed conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium-treated sole-cropped safflower had the highest biological yield.

Treatment
See1
Outcome
biological yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
4,905.50 kg ha −1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Ss treated with Se produced the highest safflower biological yield (4,905.50 kg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium-treated sole-cropped safflower had the highest seed yield.

Treatment
See1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
1,259.50 kg ha −1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Ss treated with Se produced the highest safflower biological yield (4,905.50 kg ha −1 ) and seed yield (1,259.50 kg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole-cropped chickpea had the highest biological yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume2
Treatment
Cse2
Outcome
biological yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
2,799.67 kg ha −1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Cs produced the highest chickpea biological yield (2,799.67 kg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole-cropped chickpea had the highest seed yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume3
Treatment
Cse3
Outcome
seed yielde3
Direction
higheste3
Value
852.44 kg ha −1e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Cs produced the highest chickpea biological yield (2,799.67 kg ha −1 ) and seed yield (852.44 kg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole-cropped chickpea treated with SA ranked next in biological yield, at 2,419.25 kg ha −1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume4
Treatment
SAe4
Outcome
biological yielde4
Direction
followed bye4
Value
2,419.25 kg ha −1e4
Comparator
Cse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Cs produced the highest chickpea biological yield (2,799.67 kg ha −1 ) and seed yield (852.44 kg ha −1 ), followed by Cs treated with SA (2,419.25 kg ha −1 and 764.83 kg ha −1 , respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“intercropping with chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole-cropped chickpea treated with SA ranked next in seed yield, at 764.83 kg ha −1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume4
Treatment
SAe4
Outcome
seed yielde4
Direction
followed bye4
Value
764.83 kg ha −1e4
Comparator
Cse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Cs produced the highest chickpea biological yield (2,799.67 kg ha −1 ) and seed yield (852.44 kg ha −1 ), followed by Cs treated with SA (2,419.25 kg ha −1 and 764.83 kg ha −1 , respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“intercropping with chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 3S:5C intercropping with Se had the highest safflower oil content.

Treatment
Se applicatione5
Outcome
oil contente5
Direction
higheste5
Value
32.08%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“the 3S:5C intercropping ratio (IR) with Se application recorded the highest safflower oil content (32.08%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium-treated sole-cropped safflower had the highest oil yield.

Treatment
See6
Outcome
oil yielde6
Direction
higheste6
Value
358.62 kg ha −1e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Ss treated with Se produced the highest safflower biological yield (4,905.50 kg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–793 · show in text ↑
e6

“Conversely, the 3S:5C intercropping ratio (IR) with Se application recorded the highest safflower oil content (32.08%), while Ss treated with Se produced the highest oil yield (358.62 kg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2S:4C configuration with Se produced the highest unsaturated fatty acid concentrations in safflower.

Treatment
Se applicatione7
Outcome
unsaturated fatty acid (oleic and linoleic acids) concentrationse7
Direction
higheste7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The 2S:4C configuration with Se application produced the highest unsaturated fatty acid (oleic and linoleic acids) concentrations in safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2S:4C and 3S:5C intercropping with Se produced the highest chlorophyll a and b contents in safflower.

Treatment
See7
Outcome
chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b contentse7
Direction
higheste7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“2S:4C and 3S:5C treated with Se produced the highest chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b contents in safflower and chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1495 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2S:4C and 3S:5C intercropping with Se produced the highest chlorophyll a and b contents in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume7
Treatment
See7
Outcome
chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b contentse7
Direction
higheste7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“2S:4C and 3S:5C treated with Se produced the highest chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b contents in safflower and chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1495 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1S:2C and 2S:4C with SA or Se produced the highest proline and total soluble sugars in safflower.

Treatment
SA or See7
Outcome
proline and total soluble sugarse7
Direction
higheste7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Furthermore, 1S:2C and 2S:4C treated with SA or Se produced the highest proline and total soluble sugars in safflower and chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1S:2C and 2S:4C with SA or Se produced the highest proline and total soluble sugars in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume7
Treatment
SA or See7
Outcome
proline and total soluble sugarse7
Direction
higheste7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Furthermore, 1S:2C and 2S:4C treated with SA or Se produced the highest proline and total soluble sugars in safflower and chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA and Se treatments in intercropping increased catalase, ascorbate peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activities compared with sole-cropped controls.

Treatment
SA and Se treatmentse7
Outcome
catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase activitiese7
Direction
increasede7
Comparator
control plants (sole cropping)e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“safflower yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–33 · show in text ↑
e7

“The SA and Se treatments in the intercropping systems increased catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase activities compared to the respective control plants (sole cropping)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1818 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping with stress modulator treatments is a sustainable approach for safflower and chickpea cultivation under rainfed conditions.

Outcome
intercropping systems coupled with stress modulator treatments as a sustainable approache7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“These results underscore the potential of intercropping systems coupled with stress modulator treatments as a sustainable approach for safflower and chickpea cultivation under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1920–2114 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

selenium atom · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: osmolytes · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

selenium atom · physiology: osmolytes · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

selenium atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: osmolytes · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.