Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of seed priming and foliar spray of bio-regulators on biochemical properties of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under conserved moisture condition of Bhal region of Gujarat

Ram Niwas Choudhary; Kinjal J Suthar; NJ Patel

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Three year field experiment conducted at Bhal region of Gujarat to examine the effect of seed priming and foliar spray of stress mitigating bio-regulators under conserved moisture condition on biochemical properties of chickpea. Drought is the most limiting factor for production in semi -arid ecosystem of Gujarat. Under changed climate scenario due to variability in rain fall pattern problem of drought aggravated. Experiment treatments were applied as seed soaking with thiourea (500 ppm), salicylic acid (50 ppm), thioglycolic acid (50 ppm) before sowing and foliar spray of water, thiourea (1000 ppm), salicylic acid (100 ppm) thioglycolic acid (100 ppm) at vegetative & flowering stage & one is absolute control in both of factors. Bio-regulator spray was done at vegetative & flowering stage and samples were collected after 10 days of each spray for analysis. Among the treatments imposed, result revealed that seed priming of thiourea @500 ppm recorded significantly higher values of chlorophyll A (mg/g/ fresh weight), chlorophyll B (mg/g/ fresh weight), total chlorophyll (mg/g fresh weight) and proline content (mg/100g) in second sampling. Foliar spray with thiourea @1000 ppm recorded significantly higher data of chlorophyll A (mg/g/ fresh weight), chlorophyll B (mg/g fresh weight), total chlorophyll (mg/g/ fresh weight) and proline content (mg/100g) were recorded in second sampling.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea seed priming produced significantly higher chlorophyll A, chlorophyll B and total chlorophyll in the second sampling.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
seed priming of thiourea @500 ppme0
Outcome
chlorophyll A (mg/g/ fresh weight), chlorophyll B (mg/g/ fresh weight), total chlorophyll (mg/g fresh weight)e0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
second samplinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed priming of thiourea @500 ppm recorded significantly higher values of chlorophyll A (mg/g/ fresh weight), chlorophyll B (mg/g/ fresh weight), total chlorophyll (mg/g fresh weight) and proline content (mg/100g) in second sampling.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea seed priming produced significantly higher proline content in the second sampling.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
seed priming of thiourea @500 ppme0
Outcome
proline content (mg/100g)e0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
second samplinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed priming of thiourea @500 ppm recorded significantly higher values of chlorophyll A (mg/g/ fresh weight), chlorophyll B (mg/g/ fresh weight), total chlorophyll (mg/g fresh weight) and proline content (mg/100g) in second sampling.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea foliar spray produced significantly higher chlorophyll A, chlorophyll B and total chlorophyll in the second sampling.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Foliar spray with thiourea @1000 ppme0
Outcome
chlorophyll A (mg/g/ fresh weight), chlorophyll B (mg/g fresh weight), total chlorophyll (mg/g/ fresh weight)e0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
second samplinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spray with thiourea @1000 ppm recorded significantly higher data of chlorophyll A (mg/g/ fresh weight), chlorophyll B (mg/g fresh weight), total chlorophyll (mg/g/ fresh weight) and proline content (mg/100g) were recorded in second sampling.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea foliar spray produced significantly higher proline content in the second sampling.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Foliar spray with thiourea @1000 ppme0
Outcome
proline content (mg/100g)e0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
second samplinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spray with thiourea @1000 ppm recorded significantly higher data of chlorophyll A (mg/g/ fresh weight), chlorophyll B (mg/g fresh weight), total chlorophyll (mg/g/ fresh weight) and proline content (mg/100g) were recorded in second sampling.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–116 · show in text ↑

thiourea · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · physiology: osmolytes · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

seed treatment · physiology: osmolytes · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

seed treatment · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.