Paper · 2020 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Mitigation of Moisture Stress through Foliar Spray of Thiourea, Salicylic Acid and Homobrassinolide in Chickpea Cicer arietinum L.

Abhishek . Abhishek; S. R .Doddagoudar; Basavegowda Basavegowda; et al.

9
claims
27
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the Zonal Agricultural Research Station, Kalaburgi, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur to study the influence of foliar spray of thiourea, salicylic acid and homobrassinolide on crop growth and seed yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under moisture stress conditions in rabi 2018-19. The experiment consisted of sixteen treatment combinations (four moisture stress with four foliar sprays) which was laid out in 2 factor RBD. Among the different treatments imposed, two foliar spray of thiourea @ 1000 ppm under no moisture stress (control) during flowering (45 DAS) and seed setting 75 DAS recorded significantly higher plant height (42.0 and 49.0 cm), leaf area index (3.020 and 2.003), number of primary branches plant-1 (9.1 and 10.7), chlorophyll content (SPAD values 64.4 and 56.6), number of pods plant-1 (64.3), 100 seed weight (25.0 g), drought tolerant efficiency 100.0 %, seed yield plant-1 (18.9 g) and hectare-1 (27.2 q) compared to other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea under no moisture stress gave higher plant height of 42.0 and 49.0 cm.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
two foliar spray of thiourea @ 1000 ppm under no moisture stresse0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
42.0 and 49.0 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two foliar spray of thiourea @ 1000 ppm under no moisture stress (control) during flowering (45 DAS) and seed setting 75 DAS recorded significantly higher plant height (42.0 and 49.0 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–702 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“two foliar spray of thiourea @ 1000 ppm under no moisture stress (control) during flowering (45 DAS) and seed setting 75 DAS recorded significantly higher plant height (42.0 and 49.0 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

That treatment gave higher leaf area index of 3.020 and 2.003.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
thioureae1
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
highere1
Value
3.020 and 2.003e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf area index (3.020 and 2.003)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“two foliar spray of thiourea @ 1000 ppm under no moisture stress (control) during flowering (45 DAS) and seed setting 75 DAS recorded significantly higher plant height (42.0 and 49.0 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

That treatment gave higher primary branches per plant of 9.1 and 10.7.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
thioureae1
Outcome
number of primary branches plant-1e0
Direction
highere1
Value
9.1 and 10.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of primary branches plant-1 (9.1 and 10.7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“two foliar spray of thiourea @ 1000 ppm under no moisture stress (control) during flowering (45 DAS) and seed setting 75 DAS recorded significantly higher plant height (42.0 and 49.0 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

That treatment gave higher chlorophyll SPAD values of 64.4 and 56.6.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
thioureae1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
highere1
Value
64.4 and 56.6e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll content (SPAD values 64.4 and 56.6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“two foliar spray of thiourea @ 1000 ppm under no moisture stress (control) during flowering (45 DAS) and seed setting 75 DAS recorded significantly higher plant height (42.0 and 49.0 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

That treatment gave 64.3 pods per plant, higher than other treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
thioureae1
Outcome
number of pods plant-1e0
Direction
highere1
Value
64.3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of pods plant-1 (64.3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“two foliar spray of thiourea @ 1000 ppm under no moisture stress (control) during flowering (45 DAS) and seed setting 75 DAS recorded significantly higher plant height (42.0 and 49.0 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

That treatment gave higher 100 seed weight of 25.0 g.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
thioureae1
Outcome
100 seed weighte0
Direction
highere1
Value
25.0 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100 seed weight (25.0 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“two foliar spray of thiourea @ 1000 ppm under no moisture stress (control) during flowering (45 DAS) and seed setting 75 DAS recorded significantly higher plant height (42.0 and 49.0 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

That treatment gave 100.0 % drought tolerant efficiency.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
thioureae1
Outcome
drought tolerant efficiencye0
Direction
highere1
Value
100.0 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought tolerant efficiency 100.0 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–931 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“two foliar spray of thiourea @ 1000 ppm under no moisture stress (control) during flowering (45 DAS) and seed setting 75 DAS recorded significantly higher plant height (42.0 and 49.0 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

That treatment gave higher seed yield per plant of 18.9 g.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
thioureae1
Outcome
seed yield plant-1e0
Direction
highere1
Value
18.9 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield plant-1 (18.9 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“two foliar spray of thiourea @ 1000 ppm under no moisture stress (control) during flowering (45 DAS) and seed setting 75 DAS recorded significantly higher plant height (42.0 and 49.0 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

That treatment gave higher yield per hectare of 27.2 q.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
thioureae1
Outcome
hectare-1e0
Direction
highere1
Value
27.2 qe0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hectare-1 (27.2 q) compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“two foliar spray of thiourea @ 1000 ppm under no moisture stress (control) during flowering (45 DAS) and seed setting 75 DAS recorded significantly higher plant height (42.0 and 49.0 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–702 · show in text ↑

thiourea · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

thiourea · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

thiourea · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

thiourea · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

drought · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

48 papers: 9 positive, 39 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

application · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 69 positive, 4 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.