Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Ecosystems and Ecology Science (IJEES)

EFFECT OF SALT STRESS ON IONIC ACCUMULATION AND BIOCHEMICAL BEHAVIOR OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)

Koulali F; Sehari M; Kouadria M; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Salt stress affects plants' metabolism negatively. It causes a reduction in the osmotic potential and ionic toxicity through significant accumulation of Na + in tissues. Also, it leads to a nutritional imbalance. In response to these effects, plants synthesize organic compounds called osmolytes with osmoprotective action such as proline and soluble sugars. They are important in osmotic adjustment to limit water loss and to maintain cell turgor, which motivates the development of metabolic processes in plants. Accordingly, one of the most sensitive plants to salinity is chickpeas, widely consumed by humans. The aim of this work is to identify some biochemical and mineral criteria involved in the tolerance of six chickpea genotypes subjected to high concentrations of NaCl (0, 50, 75, 100mM). The obtained results showed the salinity had a depressive effect on the rate of proteins and on soluble sugars (2.50 mg.g -1 Fresh Mater FM) except for the Collection 28 genotype (4.707 mg.g -1 FM), Ghab4 (3.912 mg.g -1 FM), and Belkhadem (3.949 mg.g -1 FM) which recorded a remarkable increase during severe stress. However, studied genotypes showed a significant accumulation of proline in leaves, around 125 mg.g -1 FM observed at 100 mM NaCl and an average of 55 mg.g -1 FM in the control. On the other hand, for the mineral balance, the genotypes were the "includer" type because they show a significant accumulation of Na + in leaves (18 mg.100g -1 Dry Matter DM on average at 100 mM NaCl compared to the control, which displays an average of 7 mg.100g -1 DM).Whereas the K + decreases (50 mg.100g -1 DM) but with a higher rate than the Na + regardless the applied dose of NaCl.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced protein content in chickpea genotypes.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
rate of proteinse0
Direction
depressivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity had a depressive effect on the rate of proteins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced soluble sugars overall, reported at 2.50 mg.g -1 Fresh Mater FM.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Treatment
salinitye1
Outcome
soluble sugarse0
Direction
depressivee1
Value
2.50 mg.g -1 Fresh Mater FMe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on soluble sugars (2.50 mg.g -1 Fresh Mater FM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–941 · show in text ↑
e1

“salinity had a depressive effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Collection 28 showed increased soluble sugars under severe stress, reaching 4.707 mg.g -1 FM.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Material
Collection 28 genotypee0
Outcome
remarkable increasee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
4.707 mg.g -1 FMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Collection 28 genotype (4.707 mg.g -1 FM), Ghab4 (3.912 mg.g -1 FM), and Belkhadem (3.949 mg.g -1 FM) which recorded a remarkable increase during severe stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ghab4 showed increased soluble sugars under severe stress, reaching 3.912 mg.g -1 FM.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Material
Ghab4e0
Outcome
remarkable increasee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
3.912 mg.g -1 FMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ghab4 (3.912 mg.g -1 FM), and Belkhadem (3.949 mg.g -1 FM) which recorded a remarkable increase during severe stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Belkhadem showed increased soluble sugars under severe stress, reaching 3.949 mg.g -1 FM.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Material
Belkhademe0
Outcome
remarkable increasee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
3.949 mg.g -1 FMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Belkhadem (3.949 mg.g -1 FM) which recorded a remarkable increase during severe stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf proline increased significantly to about 125 mg.g -1 FM at 100 mM NaCl versus 55 mg.g -1 FM in controls.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
100 mM NaCle0
Outcome
accumulation of prolinee0
Direction
accumulatione0
Value
125 mg.g -1 FMe0
Qualifier
55 mg.g -1 FMe0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant accumulation of proline in leaves, around 125 mg.g -1 FM observed at 100 mM NaCl and an average of 55 mg.g -1 FM in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1293 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf sodium increased significantly to an average 18 mg.100g -1 DM at 100 mM NaCl versus 7 mg.100g -1 DM in controls.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
100 mM NaCle0
Outcome
accumulation of Na +e0
Direction
accumulatione0
Value
18 mg.100g -1 Dry Matter DMe0
Qualifier
7 mg.100g -1 DMe0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant accumulation of Na + in leaves (18 mg.100g -1 Dry Matter DM on average at 100 mM NaCl compared to the control, which displays an average of 7 mg.100g -1 DM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1566 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium decreased to 50 mg.100g -1 DM, but remained above sodium across NaCl doses.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Outcome
K +e0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
50 mg.100g -1 DMe0
Qualifier
higher rate than the Na + regardless the applied dose of NaCle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the K + decreases (50 mg.100g -1 DM) but with a higher rate than the Na + regardless the applied dose of NaCl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1684 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–101 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · molecular: metabolites · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

salinity · physiology: osmolytes · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.