Paper · 2015 · Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

Improving use efficiency of applied phosphorus fertilizer by zinc fertilization in Basmati rice-wheat cropping system

Sovan Debnath; S. P. Pachauri; P. C. Srivastava

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Rice-wheat rotation is the most important cropping system of the Indo-Gangetic plains. On-farm experiment was conducted to reveal the effect of Zn fertilization on yield, uptake of nutrient, utilization efficiency (UE) and grain output per unit of fertilizer use through agronomic efficiency (AE) of P and Zn in rice-wheat rotation. The experiment was conducted with rice (cv. Pusa Basmati 1) and wheat (cv. UP–2425) by imposing twelve treatments involving four different doses of P (0, 20, 40 and 60 kg P2O5 ha−1) and three different doses of Zn (0, 2.5 and 5.0 kg Zn ha−1) with three replications. The yield of basmati rice was not significantly influenced by P×Zn interactions however, for wheat, a conjoint dose of 60 kg P2O5 and 5 kg Zn ha−1 gavethe highest grain yield (5.43 tha−1). Phosphorus utilization efficiency(PUE) of wheat was higher compared to basmati rice however, the reverse was true for zinc utilization efficiency (ZUE). Utilization efficiencies of the two nutrients diminished as their rate of fertilization increased, in both the crops. The AE of applied nutrients, in basmati rice varied from 31.4 to 49.7 kg grain kg−1 Pand from 43.2 to 121 kg grain kg−1 Zn. In wheat, AE for Pvaried from 26.9 to 65.5kg grain kg−1 and for Zn from 56.4 to 83 kg grain kg−1. In conclusion, the utilization and agronomic efficiency of P in basmati rice can be increased by using 40 kg P2O5 and 2.5 kg Zn ha−1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P by Zn interaction did not significantly influence basmati rice yield.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Treatment
P×Zn interactionse0
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of basmati rice was not significantly influenced by P×Zn interactions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–679 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat at 60 kg P2O5 and 5 kg Zn per hectare had the highest grain yield, 5.43 tha−1.

Treatment
60 kg P2O5 and 5 kg Zn ha−1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.43 tha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for wheat, a conjoint dose of 60 kg P2O5 and 5 kg Zn ha−1 gavethe highest grain yield (5.43 tha−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–788 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat had higher P utilization efficiency than basmati rice.

Outcome
Phosphorus utilization efficiency(PUE)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
basmati ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus utilization efficiency(PUE) of wheat was higher compared to basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–872 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basmati rice had higher zinc utilization efficiency than wheat.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Outcome
zinc utilization efficiency (ZUE)e0
Comparator
wheate0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus utilization efficiency(PUE) of wheat was higher compared to basmati rice however, the reverse was true for zinc utilization efficiency (ZUE).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–941 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Efficiency of both nutrients diminished as fertilizer rate increased in both crops.

Taxon
both the cropse0
Treatment
rate of fertilizatione0
Outcome
Utilization efficiencies of the two nutrientse0
Direction
diminishede0

Verbatim

e0

“Utilization efficiencies of the two nutrients diminished as their rate of fertilization increased, in both the crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1059 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice agronomic efficiency for P ranged from 31.4 to 49.7 kg grain kg−1 P.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Outcome
AE of applied nutrientse0
Value
31.4 to 49.7 kg grain kg−1 Pe0

Verbatim

e0

“The AE of applied nutrients, in basmati rice varied from 31.4 to 49.7 kg grain kg−1 Pand from 43.2 to 121 kg grain kg−1 Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1183 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice agronomic efficiency for Zn ranged from 43.2 to 121 kg grain kg−1 Zn.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Outcome
AE of applied nutrientse0
Value
43.2 to 121 kg grain kg−1 Zne0

Verbatim

e0

“The AE of applied nutrients, in basmati rice varied from 31.4 to 49.7 kg grain kg−1 Pand from 43.2 to 121 kg grain kg−1 Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1183 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat agronomic efficiency for P ranged from 26.9 to 65.5kg grain kg−1.

Outcome
AE for Pe0
Value
26.9 to 65.5kg grain kg−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In wheat, AE for Pvaried from 26.9 to 65.5kg grain kg−1 and for Zn from 56.4 to 83 kg grain kg−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1281 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat agronomic efficiency for Zn ranged from 56.4 to 83 kg grain kg−1.

Outcome
AEe0
Value
56.4 to 83 kg grain kg−1e0
Qualifier
for Zne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In wheat, AE for Pvaried from 26.9 to 65.5kg grain kg−1 and for Zn from 56.4 to 83 kg grain kg−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1281 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 40 kg P2O5 and 2.5 kg Zn per hectare to raise P use and agronomic efficiency in basmati rice.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Treatment
40 kg P2O5 and 2.5 kg Zn ha−1e0
Outcome
utilization and agronomic efficiency of Pe0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“the utilization and agronomic efficiency of P in basmati rice can be increased by using 40 kg P2O5 and 2.5 kg Zn ha−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1415 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.