Paper · 2018 · Sustainability

Enhancement in Productivity, Nutrients Use Efficiency, and Economics of Rice-Wheat Cropping Systems in India through Farmer’s Participatory Approach

A. S. Panwar; M. Shamim; Subhash Babu; et al.

20
claims
27
verbatim quotes
54
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Rice-wheat cropping system (RWCS), a lifeline for the majority of the population in South Asia is under stress, due to the imbalanced and indiscriminate use of fertilizers. Therefore, we conducted an on-farm study at eight locations (Amritsar, Katni, Nainital, Samba, Pakur, Kanpur, Ambedkarnagar, and Dindori) covering five agro climatic zones of six Indian states (Jammu and Kashmir, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Jharkhand) to (i) calculate the partial factor productivity (PFP) and agronomic use efficiency (AUE) to judge the response of NPK and Zn on grain yield of rice and wheat in RWCS and (ii) to work out the economic feasibility of different combinations of NPK in rice and wheat. Seven fertilizer treatments: Control (0-0-0), N alone (N-0-0), NP (N-P-0), NK (N-0-K), NPK (N-P-K), NPK+Zn (N-P-K-Zn), and FFMP (Farmers Fertilizer Management Practice) were assigned to all the locations. The levels of applied nutrients were used as per the standard recommendation of the location. The average of all the locations showed that the use of NP enhances the grain yield of rice and wheat by 105% and 97% over control, respectively. System productivity of RWCS was expressed in terms of rice grain equivalent yield (RGEY), Mg ha−1. Among the locations, Samba recorded the lowest productivity of RWCS with fertilizer treatments. In contrast, the highest productivity of RWCS with fertilizer treatments was recorded at Amritsar, except with NPK and NPK+Zn fertilization, where Katni superseded the Amritsar. An approximately 3-fold productivity gain in RWCS was recorded with the conjoint use of NP over control across the locations. Overall, the results of our study showed that the balance application of NPK increased the productivity of RWCS 245% over control. Partial factor productivity of Nitrogen (PFPn) N alone in rice varied across locations and ranged from 19 kg grain kg−1 N at Pakur to 41 kg grain kg−1 N at Amritsar. PFPn of N alone in wheat also ranged from 15.5 kg grain kg−1 of N at Ambedkarnagar to 28 kg grain kg−1 N at Amritsar. However, across locations the mean value of PFPn of N alone was 29 kg grain kg−1 N in rice and 21 kg grain kg−1 N in wheat. PFPn increased when combined application of N and P sorted in both rice and wheat across the locations. Similarly, combined application of NPK increased partial factor productivity of applied phosphorus (PFPp) in both the crops at all the locations. The combined application of NPK increased the PFPk for applied K at all the location. The response of K application with N and P when averaged over the location was 114% in rice and 93% in wheat over the combined use of N and K. In our study, irrespective of fertilizer treatments, the agronomic use efficiency of applied N (AUEn) and agronomic use efficiency of applied P (AUEp) were greater in rice than in wheat across the location. With regards to the economics, the mean net monetary returns among the fertilizers treatments was minimum (INR 29.5 × 103 ha−1) for the application of N alone and maximum (INR 8.65 × 103 ha−1) for application of NPK+Zn. The mean marginal returns across the locations was in order of N alone > NK > FFM > NPK > NP > NPK+Zn.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NP enhanced rice grain yield by 105% over control.

Treatment
NPe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
enhancese0
Value
105%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of NP enhances the grain yield of rice and wheat by 105% and 97% over control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NP enhanced wheat grain yield by 97% over control.

Treatment
NPe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
enhancese0
Value
97%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of NP enhances the grain yield of rice and wheat by 105% and 97% over control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Samba had the lowest fertilized rice-wheat system productivity.

Taxon
Rice-wheate1
Outcome
productivity of RWCSe0
Direction
loweste0
Setting
Sambae0

Verbatim

e0

“Samba recorded the lowest productivity of RWCS with fertilizer treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1357 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice-wheat cropping system (RWCS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amritsar had the highest fertilized system productivity except under NPK and NPK+Zn.

Taxon
Rice-wheate1
Outcome
productivity of RWCSe0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
except with NPK and NPK+Zn fertilizatione0
Setting
Amritsare0

Verbatim

e0

“the highest productivity of RWCS with fertilizer treatments was recorded at Amritsar, except with NPK and NPK+Zn fertilization, where Katni superseded the Amritsar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1535 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice-wheat cropping system (RWCS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Katni surpassed Amritsar in system productivity under NPK and NPK+Zn.

Taxon
Rice-wheate1
Treatment
NPK and NPK+Zn fertilizatione0
Outcome
productivity of RWCSe0
Direction
supersedede0
Comparator
Amritsare0
Setting
Katnie0

Verbatim

e0

“the highest productivity of RWCS with fertilizer treatments was recorded at Amritsar, except with NPK and NPK+Zn fertilization, where Katni superseded the Amritsar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1535 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice-wheat cropping system (RWCS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NP produced an approximately threefold system productivity gain over control across locations.

Taxon
Rice-wheate1
Treatment
conjoint use of NPe0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
gaine0
Value
3-folde0
Qualifier
approximatelye0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“An approximately 3-fold productivity gain in RWCS was recorded with the conjoint use of NP over control across the locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1661 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice-wheat cropping system (RWCS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Balanced NPK increased system productivity 245% over control.

Taxon
Rice-wheate1
Treatment
balance application of NPKe0
Outcome
productivity of RWCSe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
245%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“the balance application of NPK increased the productivity of RWCS 245% over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1708–1792 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice-wheat cropping system (RWCS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice nitrogen partial factor productivity under N alone ranged from 19 at Pakur to 41 kg grain kg−1 N at Amritsar.

Treatment
N alonee0
Outcome
Partial factor productivity of Nitrogene0
Value
19 kg grain kg−1 Ne0
Qualifier
41 kg grain kg−1 Ne0
Setting
Pakure0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Partial factor productivity of Nitrogen (PFPn) N alone in rice varied across locations and ranged from 19 kg grain kg−1 N at Pakur to 41 kg grain kg−1 N at Amritsar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1793–1958 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat nitrogen partial factor productivity under N alone ranged from 15.5 at Ambedkarnagar to 28 kg grain kg−1 N at Amritsar.

Treatment
N alonee0
Outcome
PFPne0
Value
15.5 kg grain kg−1 of Ne0
Qualifier
28 kg grain kg−1 Ne0
Setting
Ambedkarnagare0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PFPn of N alone in wheat also ranged from 15.5 kg grain kg−1 of N at Ambedkarnagar to 28 kg grain kg−1 N at Amritsar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1959–2076 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean nitrogen partial factor productivity under N alone was 29 kg grain kg−1 N in rice.

Treatment
N alonee0
Outcome
PFPne0
Value
29 kg grain kg−1 Ne0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“across locations the mean value of PFPn of N alone was 29 kg grain kg−1 N in rice and 21 kg grain kg−1 N in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2086–2200 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean nitrogen partial factor productivity under N alone was 21 kg grain kg−1 N in wheat.

Treatment
N alonee0
Outcome
PFPne0
Value
21 kg grain kg−1 Ne0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“across locations the mean value of PFPn of N alone was 29 kg grain kg−1 N in rice and 21 kg grain kg−1 N in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2086–2200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined N and P increased nitrogen partial factor productivity in rice.

Treatment
combined application of N and Pe0
Outcome
PFPne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PFPn increased when combined application of N and P sorted in both rice and wheat across the locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2201–2304 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined N and P increased nitrogen partial factor productivity in wheat.

Treatment
combined application of N and Pe0
Outcome
PFPne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PFPn increased when combined application of N and P sorted in both rice and wheat across the locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2201–2304 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK increased phosphorus partial factor productivity in both crops at all locations.

Treatment
combined application of NPKe0
Outcome
partial factor productivity of applied phosphoruse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of NPK increased partial factor productivity of applied phosphorus (PFPp) in both the crops at all the locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2316–2450 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice and wheat in RWCS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–619 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK increased potassium partial factor productivity at all locations.

Treatment
combined application of NPKe0
Outcome
PFPk for applied Ke0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of NPK increased the PFPk for applied K at all the location.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2451–2536 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice and wheat in RWCS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–619 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice response to K with N and P was 114% over combined N and K.

Treatment
K application with N and Pe0
Outcome
responsee0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
114%e0
Comparator
combined use of N and Ke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response of K application with N and P when averaged over the location was 114% in rice and 93% in wheat over the combined use of N and K.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2537–2679 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat response to K with N and P was 93% over combined N and K.

Treatment
K application with N and Pe0
Outcome
responsee0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
93%e0
Comparator
combined use of N and Ke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response of K application with N and P when averaged over the location was 114% in rice and 93% in wheat over the combined use of N and K.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2537–2679 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic use efficiencies of N and P were greater in rice than wheat across locations regardless of fertilizer treatment.

Outcome
agronomic use efficiency of applied N (AUEn) and agronomic use efficiency of applied P (AUEp)e0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
irrespective of fertilizer treatmentse0
Comparator
wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrespective of fertilizer treatments, the agronomic use efficiency of applied N (AUEn) and agronomic use efficiency of applied P (AUEp) were greater in rice than in wheat across the location.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2694–2886 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reported mean net returns were minimum under N alone at INR 29.5 × 103 ha−1 and maximum under NPK+Zn at INR 8.65 × 103 ha−1.

Outcome
mean net monetary returnse0
Direction
minimume0
Value
INR 29.5 × 103 ha−1e0
Qualifier
maximum (INR 8.65 × 103 ha−1) for application of NPK+Zne0

Not reportedTaxon

Schema note from the model: Grouped economic treatment results to retain all results within the claim budget.

Verbatim

e0

“the mean net monetary returns among the fertilizers treatments was minimum (INR 29.5 × 103 ha−1) for the application of N alone and maximum (INR 8.65 × 103 ha−1) for application of NPK+Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2918–3106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean marginal returns ranked N alone above NK, FFM, NPK, NP and NPK+Zn.

Outcome
mean marginal returnse0
Qualifier
N alone > NK > FFM > NPK > NP > NPK+Zne0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The mean marginal returns across the locations was in order of N alone > NK > FFM > NPK > NP > NPK+Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3107–3209 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 189 positive, 13 negative or no effect

188 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

256 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

475 papers: 419 positive, 56 negative or no effect

418 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

471 papers more in this group

See all 475 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.