Paper · 2016 · FEMS Microbiology Ecology

Taxonomic analysis of the microbial community in stored sugar beets using high-throughput sequencing of different marker genes

Sebastian Liebe; Daniel Wibberg; Anika Winkler; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
48
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Post-harvest colonization of sugar beets accompanied by rot development is a serious problem due to sugar losses and negative impact on processing quality. Studies on the microbial community associated with rot development and factors shaping their structure are missing. Therefore, high-throughput sequencing was applied to describe the influence of environment, plant genotype and storage temperature (8°C and 20°C) on three different communities in stored sugar beets, namely fungi (internal transcribed spacers 1 and 2), Fusarium spp. (elongation factor-1α gene fragment) and oomycetes (internal transcribed spacers 1). The composition of the fungal community changed during storage mostly influenced by the storage temperature followed by a weak environmental effect. Botrytis cinerea was the prevalent species at 8°C whereas members of the fungal genera Fusarium and Penicillium became dominant at 20°C. This shift was independent of the plant genotype. Species richness within the genus Fusarium also increased during storage at both temperatures whereas the oomycetes community did not change. Moreover, oomycetes species were absent after storage at 20°C. The results of the present study clearly show that rot development during sugar beet storage is associated with pathogens well known as causal agents of post-harvest diseases in many other crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal community composition changed during storage.

Outcome
composition of the fungal communitye0
Direction
changede0
Qualifier
during storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The composition of the fungal community changed during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–686 · show in text ↑
t0

“stored sugar beets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage temperature was the strongest influence on fungal community composition.

Outcome
fungal communitye1
Setting
storage temperaturee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mostly influenced by the storage temperature followed by a weak environmental effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–772 · show in text ↑
t0

“stored sugar beets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“The composition of the fungal community changed during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–686 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Environmental effects on fungal community composition were weak.

Outcome
environmental effecte0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by a weak environmental effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–772 · show in text ↑
t0

“stored sugar beets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Botrytis cinerea prevailed at 8°C.

Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
prevalent speciese0
Setting
8°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Botrytis cinerea was the prevalent species at 8°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“stored sugar beets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium became dominant at 20°C.

Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
became dominante0
Setting
20°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“members of the fungal genera Fusarium and Penicillium became dominant at 20°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“stored sugar beets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penicillium became dominant at 20°C.

Interactor
PenicilliumPenicilliume0pathogen
Outcome
became dominante0
Setting
20°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium
Penicillium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMilo Manica · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“members of the fungal genera Fusarium and Penicillium became dominant at 20°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“stored sugar beets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungal community shift was independent of plant genotype.

Material
plant genotypee0
Outcome
shifte0
Direction
independente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This shift was independent of the plant genotype.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“stored sugar beets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium species richness increased during storage at both temperatures.

Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
Species richness within the genus Fusariume0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both temperaturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Species richness within the genus Fusarium also increased during storage at both temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“stored sugar beets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oomycete community composition did not change during storage.

Interactor
oomycetesOomycotae0pathogen
Outcome
oomycetes communitye0
Direction
did not changee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the oomycetes community did not change.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“stored sugar beets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oomycete species were absent after storage at 20°C.

Interactor
oomycetesOomycotae0pathogen
Outcome
oomycetes species were absente0
Setting
20°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“oomycetes species were absent after storage at 20°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“stored sugar beets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors link rot development during beet storage with established postharvest pathogens.

Interactor
pathogense0pathogen
Outcome
rot developmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rot development during sugar beet storage is associated with pathogens well known as causal agents of post-harvest diseases in many other crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1360 · show in text ↑