Paper · 1988 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Integration of Agronomic and Weed Control Methods in Managing Weeds in Maize

N. N. Angiras; C.M. Singh

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments conducted for two years revealed that dry matter of weeds and weed population was significantly lowest with integration of chemical weed control, maize + soybean (1:1) cropping system, 90,000 maize plant population and 50 percent higher than the reccmnended fertility level. However, significantly highest maize grain yield and maize equivalent yield were obtained with integration of chemical weed control, maize + soybean (1:1) cropping system, 75,000 maize population and 50 percent higher fertilization than recommended.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 90,000 maize population combination gave the lowest weed dry matter and population.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
integration of chemical weed control, maize + soybean (1:1) cropping system, 90,000 maize plant population and 50 percent higher than the reccmnended fertility levele0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
dry matter of weeds and weed populatione0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry matter of weeds and weed population was significantly lowest with integration of chemical weed control, maize + soybean (1:1) cropping system, 90,000 maize plant population and 50 percent higher than the reccmnended fertility level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–291 · show in text ↑
t0

“Integration of Agronomic and Weed Control Methods in Managing Weeds in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75,000 maize population combination gave the highest maize grain and equivalent yields.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
integration of chemical weed control, maize + soybean (1:1) cropping system, 75,000 maize population and 50 percent higher fertilization than recommendede0
Outcome
maize grain yield and maize equivalent yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly highest maize grain yield and maize equivalent yield were obtained with integration of chemical weed control, maize + soybean (1:1) cropping system, 75,000 maize population and 50 percent higher fertilization than recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–541 · show in text ↑

Glycine max · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Glycine max · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

180 papers: 155 positive, 25 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

176 papers more in this group

See all 180 papers →

cultivation system · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

density · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 26 positive, 7 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 110 positive, 45 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

herbicide · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

406 papers: 360 positive, 46 negative or no effect

359 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

402 papers more in this group

See all 406 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.