Paper · 2011 · Journal of Hill Agriculture

Physico-chemical characters of different cultivars of pear affected by bio-regulators during storage

BL Attri; Hare Krishna; Nazeer Ahmed; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To enhance the shelf life of the fruit for extending its availability in the market, a study was carried out on the effect of bio-regulators viz., salicylic acid and Ca-EDTA on different cultivars of pear like Sand pear, Jagner, Kashmiri, Kakria and Olympia. The selected fruits of different cultivars of pear were dipped for 30 minutes in salicylic acid @ 200 ppm, Ca-EDTA @ 0.4% ppm and control (distilled water dip). The treated fruits were stored in CFB boxes at ambient temperature (18–20°C) for 30 days. During storage, the effect of bio-regulators on various physicochemical characteristics such as TSS, acidity, ascorbic acid, sugars and antioxidants of pear fruits were studied at 10 days interval. It was found that the fruits treated with bio-regulators had significantly better firmness retention and low PLW (8.37, 10.24, 12.34, 2.29, 5.73%) during storage for 30 days as compared to control (11.10, 14.08, 15.95, 5.46, 11.32%). The TSS, acidity, ascorbic acid, sugars and antioxidant contents in these treatments remained checked, whereas in untreated fruits the conversion rate was faster. During storage, salicylic acid and Ca-EDTA slowed down respiration rate resulting better shelf life. The treated fruits irrespective of cultivars had a shelf life of 30 days as compared to 20 days in control. The study concluded that the shelf life of the pear fruits could be increased with better physico-chemical characteristics using bio-regulators like salicylic acid and Ca-EDTA.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-regulator dips significantly improved firmness retention.

Treatment
bio-regulatorse0
Outcome
firmness retentione0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
during storage for 30 dayse0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was found that the fruits treated with bio-regulators had significantly better firmness retention and low PLW (8.37, 10.24, 12.34, 2.29, 5.73%) during storage for 30 days as compared to control (11.10, 14.08, 15.95, 5.46, 11.32%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-regulator dips reduced physiological loss in weight relative to control during 30-day storage.

Treatment
bio-regulatorse0
Outcome
PLWe0
Direction
lowe0
Value
8.37, 10.24, 12.34, 2.29, 5.73%e0
Qualifier
during storage for 30 dayse0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was found that the fruits treated with bio-regulators had significantly better firmness retention and low PLW (8.37, 10.24, 12.34, 2.29, 5.73%) during storage for 30 days as compared to control (11.10, 14.08, 15.95, 5.46, 11.32%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-regulator treatment checked changes in TSS, acidity and ascorbic acid during storage.

Treatment
these treatmentse0
Outcome
TSS, acidity, ascorbic acide0
Direction
remained checkede0
Comparator
untreated fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The TSS, acidity, ascorbic acid, sugars and antioxidant contents in these treatments remained checked, whereas in untreated fruits the conversion rate was faster.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-regulator treatment checked changes in sugars and antioxidant contents during storage.

Treatment
these treatmentse0
Outcome
sugars and antioxidant contentse0
Direction
remained checkede0
Comparator
untreated fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The TSS, acidity, ascorbic acid, sugars and antioxidant contents in these treatments remained checked, whereas in untreated fruits the conversion rate was faster.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated pear fruits had a faster conversion rate.

Outcome
conversion ratee0
Direction
fastere0
Comparator
these treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The TSS, acidity, ascorbic acid, sugars and antioxidant contents in these treatments remained checked, whereas in untreated fruits the conversion rate was faster.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid slowed respiration rate in stored pear fruits.

Treatment
salicylic acide0
Outcome
respiration ratee0
Direction
slowed downe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During storage, salicylic acid and Ca-EDTA slowed down respiration rate resulting better shelf life.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ca-EDTA slowed respiration rate in stored pear fruits.

Treatment
Ca-EDTAe0
Outcome
respiration ratee0
Direction
slowed downe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During storage, salicylic acid and Ca-EDTA slowed down respiration rate resulting better shelf life.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated pear fruits lasted 30 days, versus 20 days in controls.

Treatment
treated fruitse0
Outcome
shelf lifee0
Value
30 dayse0
Qualifier
20 dayse0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treated fruits irrespective of cultivars had a shelf life of 30 days as compared to 20 days in control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1313 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded bio-regulators can extend pear shelf life with better physicochemical quality.

Treatment
bio-regulators like salicylic acid and Ca-EDTAe0
Outcome
shelf life of the pear fruits could be increased with better physico-chemical characteristicse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study concluded that the shelf life of the pear fruits could be increased with better physico-chemical characteristics using bio-regulators like salicylic acid and Ca-EDTA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1490 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · physiology: respiration · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: respiration · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.