Abstract
Early stage reactions of glyphosate-resistant cotton material KC07-58 and non-resistant material o2c07-68 were observed by spraying glyphosate liquor at different concentrations to entire plant in full bud stage.Total boll numbers and wadding rate were also analyzed in this paper.The result indicated that there were different reactions between antigrass material and non-antigrass material.There was little effect to total boll numbers of antigrass material by spraying glyphosate liquor in bud stage,while significant effect could be detected at wadding rate.Safe glyphosate liquor concentration of glyphosate-resistant cotton material KC07-58 in bug stage should be ≤4g/L.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying glyphosate at bud stage had little effect on total boll numbers of the antigrass material.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Material
- antigrass materiale2
- Treatment
- spraying glyphosate liquore2
- Outcome
- total boll numberse2
- Direction
- little effecte2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Research on glyphosate-resistant of genetically modified roundup ready cotton in full bud time.”
e2“There was little effect to total boll numbers of antigrass material by spraying glyphosate liquor in bud stage, while significant effect could be detected at wadding rate”
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying glyphosate at bud stage had a significant effect on wadding rate.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- spraying glyphosate liquore2
- Outcome
- wadding ratee2
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Research on glyphosate-resistant of genetically modified roundup ready cotton in full bud time.”
e2“There was little effect to total boll numbers of antigrass material by spraying glyphosate liquor in bud stage, while significant effect could be detected at wadding rate”
Claim · model-written summary
Antigrass and non-antigrass cotton material reacted differently to glyphosate.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Material
- antigrass materiale3
- Outcome
- reactionse3
- Comparator
- non-antigrass materiale3
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Research on glyphosate-resistant of genetically modified roundup ready cotton in full bud time.”
e3“The result indicated that there were different reactions between antigrass material and non-antigrass material”
Claim · model-written summary
The safe glyphosate concentration for glyphosate-resistant cotton material KC07-58 at bud stage should be 4 g/L or less.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Material
- glyphosate-resistant cotton material KC07-58e4
- Treatment
- glyphosatee4
- Outcome
- Safe glyphosate liquor concentratione4
- Value
- ≤4g/Le4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Research on glyphosate-resistant of genetically modified roundup ready cotton in full bud time.”
e4“Safe glyphosate liquor concentration of glyphosate-resistant cotton material KC07-58 in bug stage should be ≤4g/L”
The same questions in other papers
glyphosate · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 253 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
279 papers more in this group
See all 283 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.