Paper · 2015 · Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development

Climate Resilient Intercropping Systems for Rainfed Black Soils of Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra

G. Rajender Reddy; Y.G. Prasad; M. Osman; et al.

12
claims
18
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The assessment studies on different intercropping systems along with their respective sole crops were implemented with active participation of farmers in Yagantipalle village of Kurnool district (Andhra Pradesh), Aurangabad and Nandurbar districts of Maharashtra during 2011 to 2014 as a part of National Initiative on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) project. The main objective of the study was to popularize climate resilient rainfed intercropping systems in black soils to mitigate climate variability. Intercropping of foxtail millet + pigeonpea (5:1) was identified as best climate resilient system in black soils (kurnool district) of Andhra Pradesh. This system on an average enhanced pigeonpea seed equivalent yields by 406 and 191 kg/ha compared to sole crops of foxtail millet and pigeonpea and recorded 41% of yield advantage over sole crops. In Aurangabad district of Maharashtra, soyabean + pigeonpea (4:2) and pigeonpea + green gram (1:2) were identified as climate resilient intercropping systems. Cotton + greengram (1:1) intercropping system was suitable during medium and good rainfall years in black soils of Aurangabad district. In Nandurbar district of Maharashtra, soybean + pigeonpea (3:1) was found stable over different rainfall patterns. On an average, the intercropping system of soybean + pigeonpea (3:1) recorded 73% higher net income than sole pigeonpea. Though the seed yields of intercrops were reduced by 15–20% than respective sole crops in intercropping system, the seed yields of intercropping system was always higher (30 to 60%) than sole crops. Hence, adoption of intercropping systems in rainfed black soils is climate resilient system and also helps in improving food security in rainfed areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foxtail millet plus pigeonpea at 5:1 was identified as the best climate resilient system in Kurnool black soils.

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicae0
Treatment
foxtail millet + pigeonpea (5:1)e0
Outcome
best climate resilient systeme0
Setting
kurnool districte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping of foxtail millet + pigeonpea (5:1) was identified as best climate resilient system in black soils (kurnool district) of Andhra Pradesh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The foxtail millet plus pigeonpea system increased pigeonpea seed equivalent yield by 406 kg/ha versus sole foxtail millet.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
Intercropping of foxtail millet + pigeonpea (5:1)e0
Outcome
pigeonpea seed equivalent yieldse1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
406e1
Comparator
sole crops of foxtail millete1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping of foxtail millet + pigeonpea (5:1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–561 · show in text ↑
e1

“This system on an average enhanced pigeonpea seed equivalent yields by 406 and 191 kg/ha compared to sole crops of foxtail millet and pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–806 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The foxtail millet plus pigeonpea system increased pigeonpea seed equivalent yield by 191 kg/ha versus sole pigeonpea.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
Intercropping of foxtail millet + pigeonpea (5:1)e0
Outcome
pigeonpea seed equivalent yieldse1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
191 kg/hae1
Comparator
pigeonpeae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping of foxtail millet + pigeonpea (5:1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–561 · show in text ↑
e1

“This system on an average enhanced pigeonpea seed equivalent yields by 406 and 191 kg/ha compared to sole crops of foxtail millet and pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–806 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The foxtail millet plus pigeonpea system had a 41% yield advantage over sole crops.

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicae0
Treatment
foxtail millet + pigeonpea (5:1)e0
Outcome
yield advantagee1
Direction
advantagee1
Value
41%e1
Comparator
sole cropse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping of foxtail millet + pigeonpea (5:1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–561 · show in text ↑
e1

“recorded 41% of yield advantage over sole crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–858 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soyabean plus pigeonpea at 4:2 was identified as climate resilient in Aurangabad.

Taxon
soyabeane0
Treatment
soyabean + pigeonpea (4:2)e0
Outcome
climate resilient intercropping systemse0
Setting
Aurangabad district of Maharashtrae0

Verbatim

e0

“In Aurangabad district of Maharashtra, soyabean + pigeonpea (4:2) and pigeonpea + green gram (1:2) were identified as climate resilient intercropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–1018 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea plus green gram at 1:2 was identified as climate resilient in Aurangabad.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
pigeonpea + green gram (1:2)e0
Outcome
climate resilient intercropping systemse0
Setting
Aurangabad district of Maharashtrae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Aurangabad district of Maharashtra, soyabean + pigeonpea (4:2) and pigeonpea + green gram (1:2) were identified as climate resilient intercropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–1018 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton plus greengram at 1:1 was suitable in medium and good rainfall years in Aurangabad.

Treatment
Cotton + greengram (1:1)e0
Outcome
suitablee0
Qualifier
medium and good rainfall yearse0
Setting
Aurangabad districte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton + greengram (1:1) intercropping system was suitable during medium and good rainfall years in black soils of Aurangabad district.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1154 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean plus pigeonpea at 3:1 was stable across rainfall patterns in Nandurbar.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
soybean + pigeonpea (3:1)e0
Outcome
stable over different rainfall patternse0
Setting
Nandurbar district of Maharashtrae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Nandurbar district of Maharashtra, soybean + pigeonpea (3:1) was found stable over different rainfall patterns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1269 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean plus pigeonpea at 3:1 yielded 73% higher net income than sole pigeonpea.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
soybean + pigeonpea (3:1)e0
Outcome
net incomee0
Direction
highere0
Value
73%e0
Comparator
sole pigeonpeae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the intercropping system of soybean + pigeonpea (3:1) recorded 73% higher net income than sole pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1389 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercrop seed yields were 15–20% below their respective sole crops.

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicae1
Treatment
intercropping systeme0
Outcome
seed yields of intercropse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
15–20%e0
Comparator
respective sole cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Though the seed yields of intercrops were reduced by 15–20% than respective sole crops in intercropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1501 · show in text ↑
e1

“Intercropping of foxtail millet + pigeonpea (5:1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–561 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total intercropping system seed yields were 30 to 60% above sole crops.

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicae1
Treatment
intercropping systeme0
Outcome
seed yields of intercropping systeme0
Direction
highere0
Value
30 to 60%e0
Comparator
sole cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the seed yields of intercropping system was always higher (30 to 60%) than sole crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1588 · show in text ↑
e1

“Intercropping of foxtail millet + pigeonpea (5:1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–561 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend adopting intercropping in rainfed black soils for climate resilience and food security.

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicae1
Outcome
adoption of intercropping systems in rainfed black soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hence, adoption of intercropping systems in rainfed black soils is climate resilient system and also helps in improving food security in rainfed areas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1741 · show in text ↑
e1

“Intercropping of foxtail millet + pigeonpea (5:1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–561 · show in text ↑

Cajanus cajan · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Setaria italica · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

117 papers: 94 positive, 23 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

intercropping · yield · Setaria italica (foxtail millet)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.