Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Soybean-pigeon pea intercropping produced higher net return than monocropping.

A claim from Sustainable Management of Vertisols in Central India · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean-pigeon pea intercropping produced higher net return than monocropping.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Intercropping of soybean with pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) in 4:2 ratioe0
Interactor
pigeon peaCajanus cajane0other
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs. 27,620/hae0
Comparator
monocropping systeme0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · InteractorFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping of soybean with pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) in 4:2 ratio produced higher net return (Rs. 27,620/ha) and benefit-cost ratio (3.3:1) than either of the monocropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1104

Title

Sustainable Management of Vertisols in Central India

R. P. Rajput; D. L. Kauraw; R. K. Bhatnagar; et al. Journal of Crop Improvement 2009. doi:10.1080/15427520802643718

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-cbc6ce5fd7414dfa6d0da67c952e11f4a60e5772c1ff415f2e7e7648a05ca9ed · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

Cajanus cajan · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

intercropping · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

218 papers: 131 positive, 87 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this claim · 79 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

209 papers more in this group

See all 218 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.