Abstract
A field study was conducted at the experimental cum research farm, AICRP on Dryland Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (Maharashtra) during 2011 to 2016 on a deep Vertisols. The experiment was laid out in factorial randomized block design with three replication and three prominent intercropping systems i.e. Sorghum + pigeon pea (4: 2), Soybean + pigeon pea (4: 2) and Bt cotton + soybean (1: 1) and five tillage practices i.e. shallow tillage with bullock drawn implements, convectional tillage with bullock drawn implements, shallow tillage with tractor drawn implements, convectional tillage with tractor drawn implements and tillage with rotary tillers. Bt cotton + soybean intercropping system recorded significantly superior seed Bt cotton equivalent yield than other cropping systems. Soybean + pigeon pea and sorghum + pigeon pea recorded at par seed cotton equivalent yield. Among tillage practices, shallow tillage with tractor drawn implements recorded significantly higher seed cotton equivalent yield than Conventional tillage with bullock drawn implement, conventional tillage with tractor drawn implements and tillage with rotary tillers and found to be at par with shallow tillage with bullock drawn and Bt cotton + soybean in combination with shallow tillage with tractor drawn implement recorded significantly higher seed cotton equivalent yield than other cropping system. Gross monetary, net monetary returns and B: C ratio in Bt cotton + soybean in combination with shallow tillage with tractor drawn implement was found significant.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Bt cotton and soybean intercropping gave superior seed Bt cotton equivalent yield over other systems.
Verbatim
e0“Bt cotton + soybean intercropping system recorded significantly superior seed Bt cotton equivalent yield than other cropping systems.”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean and pigeon pea intercropping had seed cotton equivalent yield at par with sorghum and pigeon pea.
- Taxon
- Soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- Soybean + pigeon peae0
- Outcome
- seed cotton equivalent yielde0
- Direction
- at pare0
- Comparator
- sorghum + pigeon peae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soybean + pigeon pea and sorghum + pigeon pea recorded at par seed cotton equivalent yield.”
Claim · model-written summary
Shallow tractor tillage increased seed cotton equivalent yield relative to three other tillage practices.
- Treatment
- shallow tillage with tractor drawn implementse0
- Outcome
- seed cotton equivalent yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- Conventional tillage with bullock drawn implement, conventional tillage with tractor drawn implements and tillage with rotary tillerse0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“shallow tillage with tractor drawn implements recorded significantly higher seed cotton equivalent yield than Conventional tillage with bullock drawn implement, conventional tillage with tractor drawn implements and tillage with rotary tillers”
t0“Inter cropping Systems”
Claim · model-written summary
Shallow tractor tillage and shallow bullock tillage yielded at par.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“found to be at par with shallow tillage with bullock drawn”
Claim · model-written summary
Bt cotton and soybean with shallow tractor tillage gave significantly higher seed cotton equivalent yield than other cropping systems.
Verbatim
e0“Bt cotton + soybean in combination with shallow tillage with tractor drawn implement recorded significantly higher seed cotton equivalent yield than other cropping system”
Claim · model-written summary
Gross monetary returns were significant for Bt cotton and soybean with shallow tractor tillage.
Verbatim
e0“Gross monetary, net monetary returns and B: C ratio in Bt cotton + soybean in combination with shallow tillage with tractor drawn implement was found significant.”
Claim · model-written summary
Net monetary returns were significant for Bt cotton and soybean with shallow tractor tillage.
Verbatim
e0“Gross monetary, net monetary returns and B: C ratio in Bt cotton + soybean in combination with shallow tillage with tractor drawn implement was found significant.”
Claim · model-written summary
Benefit-cost ratio was significant for Bt cotton and soybean with shallow tractor tillage.
Verbatim
e0“Gross monetary, net monetary returns and B: C ratio in Bt cotton + soybean in combination with shallow tillage with tractor drawn implement was found significant.”
The same questions in other papers
Cajanus cajan · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
10 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Glycine max · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →intercropping · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ
84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
100 papers more in this group
See all 104 papers →transgenic · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
74 papers more in this group
See all 78 papers →tillage · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
155 papers more in this group
See all 159 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.