Paper · 2006 · Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science

Effect of tillage and irrigation regimes on soil physical properties and performance of sunflower in rice fallows II. Water use and crop yield

P. Gurumurthyu; M. Singa Rao

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Studies on the interaction effects of tillage practices and irrigation regimes on water use, seed yield and water use efficiency of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in sandy clay loam Alfisol under rice fallows revealed that water retention and availability in soil improved up to 30 cm depth in tractor-drawn disc plough or MB plough tillage (deep tillage) treatments while it was restricted to 15 cm in bullock-drawn desi plough tillage (shallow tillage). Tillage with tractor-drawn disc plough + rotavator (Deep-fine tillage) gave significantly higher seed yield (1311 kg ha−1) over tractor drawn MB plough + tractor drawn cultivator - deep tillage (1172 kg ha−1), bullock-drawn desi plough + power tiller-operated rotavator - shallow fine tillage (1054 kg ha−1), bullock-drawn desi plough + bullock-drawn cultivator - shallow tillage (931 kg ha−1). Irrigation regime at IW/CPE = 1.2 recorded higher seed yield than IW/CPE = 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0. Water use (ETa) by sunflower increased with increase in intensity of tillage and irrigation. The WUE was higher in deep tillage practices and in irrigation regime of IW/CPE = 0.8. Deep tillage, besides saving 18% irrigation water, resulted in about 24% higher sunflower seed yield compared with shallow tillage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage improved soil water retention to 30 cm versus 15 cm under shallow tillage.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
deep tillagee0
Outcome
water retention and availability in soile0
Direction
improvede0
Value
30 cme0
Qualifier
15 cme0
Comparator
shallow tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water retention and availability in soil improved up to 30 cm depth in tractor-drawn disc plough or MB plough tillage (deep tillage) treatments while it was restricted to 15 cm in bullock-drawn desi plough tillage (shallow tillage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–456 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep fine tillage yielded 1311 kg ha−1, significantly above other tillages.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Deep-fine tillagee0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1311 kg ha−1e0
Comparator
deep tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep-fine tillage) gave significantly higher seed yield (1311 kg ha−1) over tractor drawn MB plough + tractor drawn cultivator - deep tillage (1172 kg ha−1), bullock-drawn desi plough + power tiller-operated rotavator - shallow fine tillage (1054 kg ha−1), bullock-drawn desi plough + bullock-drawn cultivator - shallow tillage (931 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IW/CPE 1.2 yielded more seed than lower irrigation regimes.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
IW/CPE = 1.2e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
IW/CPE = 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation regime at IW/CPE = 1.2 recorded higher seed yield than IW/CPE = 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–944 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–97 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower water use rose with tillage and irrigation intensity.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
intensity of tillage and irrigatione0
Outcome
Water use (ETa)e0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water use (ETa) by sunflower increased with increase in intensity of tillage and irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1037 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency was higher with deep tillage.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
deep tillage practicese0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WUE was higher in deep tillage practices and in irrigation regime of IW/CPE = 0.8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency was higher at IW/CPE 0.8.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
IW/CPE = 0.8e0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WUE was higher in deep tillage practices and in irrigation regime of IW/CPE = 0.8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage saved 18% irrigation water relative to shallow tillage.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
Deep tillagee0
Outcome
irrigation watere0
Direction
savinge0
Value
18%e0
Comparator
shallow tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep tillage, besides saving 18% irrigation water, resulted in about 24% higher sunflower seed yield compared with shallow tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage raised sunflower seed yield by about 24%.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
Deep tillagee0
Outcome
sunflower seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
24%e0
Comparator
shallow tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep tillage, besides saving 18% irrigation water, resulted in about 24% higher sunflower seed yield compared with shallow tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1256 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 50 positive, 20 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

tillage · physiology: water · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.