Paper · 1999 · HortScience

Growth Response of Snap Bean and Tomato as Affected by Salinity and Irrigation Method

J.M.S. Scholberg; S.J. Locascio

11
claims
12
verbatim quotes
44
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Although the effects of salinity on yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. ) grown under arid and semiarid conditions are well known, little information is available on the effects of salinity on crops grown in more humid conditions. In Florida, availability of high-quality water for irrigation may be reduced because of increased domestic consumption and sea water intrusion. Two greenhouse studies were conducted to determine the influence of irrigation system and water quantity and quality on the growth of tomato and snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Bean plant heights and weights were greater with drip irrigation than with subirrigation. Bean seed germination percentage, plant height, and shoot weight decreased linearly with an increase in electrical conductivity of irrigation water (EC i ) from 1 to 4 dS·m -1 . Tomato leaf water potential and plant height decreased linearly with increasing salinity. Tomato stem and leaf weights were greatest at the intermediate salinity (2 dS·m -1 ) during initial growth, and stem weights decreased linearly with increased salinity during flowering. With drip irrigation, concentration of N for both crops decreased and concentration of P increased with an increase in water application from 0.75 to 1.5 times the estimated evapotranspiration rate (ET a ). Tomato and bean tissue Na concentrations increased linearly with increased salinity. Total fruit yield and average fruit weight decreased linearly in tomato, and marketable fruit yield decreased quadratically with increased salinity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation increased bean plant height and weight over subirrigation.

Taxon
Beane0
Treatment
drip irrigatione0
Outcome
plant heights and weightse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
subirrigatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Bean plant heights and weights were greater with drip irrigation than with subirrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation-water conductivity decreased bean seed germination, height and shoot weight.

Taxon
Beane0
Treatment
increase in electrical conductivity of irrigation water (EC i ) from 1 to 4 dS·m -1e0
Outcome
seed germination percentage, plant height, and shoot weighte0
Direction
decreased linearlye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Bean seed germination percentage, plant height, and shoot weight decreased linearly with an increase in electrical conductivity of irrigation water (EC i ) from 1 to 4 dS·m -1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–833 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity decreased tomato leaf water potential and height.

Treatment
increasing salinitye0
Outcome
leaf water potential and plant heighte0
Direction
decreased linearlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato leaf water potential and plant height decreased linearly with increasing salinity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–923 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At initial growth, tomato stem and leaf weights peaked at intermediate salinity.

Organ / stage
initial growthe0
Treatment
intermediate salinity (2 dS·m -1 )e0
Outcome
stem and leaf weightse0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato stem and leaf weights were greatest at the intermediate salinity (2 dS·m -1 ) during initial growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During flowering, tomato stem weight declined with greater salinity.

Organ / stage
floweringe0
Treatment
increased salinitye0
Outcome
stem weightse0
Direction
decreased linearlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stem weights decreased linearly with increased salinity during flowering.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More drip-irrigation water decreased nitrogen concentration in both crops.

Taxon
both cropse0
Treatment
increase in water application from 0.75 to 1.5 times the estimated evapotranspiration rate (ET a )e0
Outcome
concentration of Ne0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
With drip irrigatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“With drip irrigation, concentration of N for both crops decreased and concentration of P increased with an increase in water application from 0.75 to 1.5 times the estimated evapotranspiration rate (ET a ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More drip-irrigation water increased phosphorus concentration in both crops.

Taxon
both cropse0
Treatment
increase in water application from 0.75 to 1.5 times the estimated evapotranspiration rate (ET a )e0
Outcome
concentration of Pe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
With drip irrigatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“With drip irrigation, concentration of N for both crops decreased and concentration of P increased with an increase in water application from 0.75 to 1.5 times the estimated evapotranspiration rate (ET a ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tissue sodium rose linearly with salinity in tomato and bean.

Taxon
Tomato and beane0
Treatment
increased salinitye0
Outcome
tissue Na concentrationse0
Direction
increased linearlye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato and bean tissue Na concentrations increased linearly with increased salinity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato total fruit yield fell linearly with salinity.

Treatment
increased salinitye0
Outcome
Total fruit yielde0
Direction
decreased linearlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total fruit yield and average fruit weight decreased linearly in tomato, and marketable fruit yield decreased quadratically with increased salinity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato average fruit weight fell linearly with salinity.

Treatment
increased salinitye0
Outcome
average fruit weighte0
Direction
decreased linearlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total fruit yield and average fruit weight decreased linearly in tomato, and marketable fruit yield decreased quadratically with increased salinity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato marketable fruit yield decreased quadratically with salinity.

Treatment
increased salinitye0
Outcome
marketable fruit yielde0
Direction
decreased quadraticallye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total fruit yield and average fruit weight decreased linearly in tomato, and marketable fruit yield decreased quadratically with increased salinity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1550 · show in text ↑

salinity · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

29 papers: 7 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

salinity · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

48 papers: 11 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

salinity · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 1 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

irrigation · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 22 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

salinity · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 8 positive, 58 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

salinity · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 18 positive, 142 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.