Paper · 1994 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Effects of NaCl on Flows of N and Mineral Ions and on NO3- Reduction Rate within Whole Plants of Salt-Sensitive Bean and Salt-Tolerant Cotton

H. Gouia; M. H. Ghorbal; B. Touraine

6
claims
17
verbatim quotes
163
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effects of NaCl on the transport rates of cations, NO3-, and reduced N compounds between roots and shoot and on NO3- assimilation rate were examined on plants of two species differing in their sensitivity to salinity, bean (Phaseolus vulgare L. cv Gabriella) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv Akala). Biomass production after 20 d in response to 50 and 100 mM NaCl decreased by 48 and 59% in bean, but only 6 and 14% in cotton. The comparison of the flow patterns obtained for control and NaCl-fed plants showed that salinity induced a general decrease in all the fluxes involved in partitioning of N and the various ions. This decrease was markedly higher in bean than in cotton. Within either species, the different flows (uptake, xylem flux, phloem flux) of a given element were affected by NaCl to the same extent with minor exceptions. No specific effect of salinity on any of the components of N partitioning were discerned. The greater sensitivity of nitrate reductase activity to NaCl in bean leaves compared to cotton leaves seems to be due to a decreased compartmentalization of ions rather than to a difference in salt tolerance of the enzyme itself. Overall, our data show that alteration of mineral nutrition is not solely the reflection of a decreased growth rate, but also is a general process that impairs uptake of all the minerals even at mild NaCl salinity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaCl at 50 and 100 mM decreased bean biomass by 48 and 59% relative to control.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
50 and 100 mM NaCle1
Outcome
Biomass productione1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
48 and 59%e1
Comparator
controle2

Verbatim

e0

“bean (Phaseolus vulgare L. cv Gabriella) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv Akala)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–306 · show in text ↑
e1

“Biomass production after 20 d in response to 50 and 100 mM NaCl decreased by 48 and 59% in bean, but only 6 and 14% in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–433 · show in text ↑
e2

“The comparison of the flow patterns obtained for control and NaCl-fed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–511 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaCl at 50 and 100 mM decreased cotton biomass by 6 and 14% relative to control.

Treatment
50 and 100 mM NaCle1
Outcome
Biomass productione1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
6 and 14%e1
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bean (Phaseolus vulgare L. cv Gabriella) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv Akala)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–306 · show in text ↑
e1

“Biomass production after 20 d in response to 50 and 100 mM NaCl decreased by 48 and 59% in bean, but only 6 and 14% in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–433 · show in text ↑
e2

“The comparison of the flow patterns obtained for control and NaCl-fed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–511 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity decreased the flows of N and ions, and the decrease was markedly higher in bean than in cotton.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
salinitye3
Outcome
fluxes involved in partitioning of N and the various ionse3
Direction
decreasee3
Qualifier
markedly higher in bean than in cottone4
Comparator
controle2

Verbatim

e0

“bean (Phaseolus vulgare L. cv Gabriella) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv Akala)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–306 · show in text ↑
e2

“The comparison of the flow patterns obtained for control and NaCl-fed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–511 · show in text ↑
e3

“salinity induced a general decrease in all the fluxes involved in partitioning of N and the various ions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–628 · show in text ↑
e4

“This decrease was markedly higher in bean than in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–686 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity had no specific effect on any component of N partitioning in bean and cotton.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
salinitye5
Outcome
components of N partitioninge5
Direction
No specific effecte5
Comparator
controle2

Verbatim

e0

“bean (Phaseolus vulgare L. cv Gabriella) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv Akala)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–306 · show in text ↑
e2

“The comparison of the flow patterns obtained for control and NaCl-fed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–511 · show in text ↑
e5

“No specific effect of salinity on any of the components of N partitioning were discerned”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–936 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater sensitivity of nitrate reductase activity to NaCl in bean leaves than in cotton leaves seems to be due to decreased compartmentalization of ions.

Taxon
beane0
Organ / stage
leavese6
Outcome
greater sensitivity of nitrate reductase activity to NaCle6
Qualifier
decreased compartmentalization of ionse6

Verbatim

e0

“bean (Phaseolus vulgare L. cv Gabriella) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv Akala)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–306 · show in text ↑
e6

“The greater sensitivity of nitrate reductase activity to NaCl in bean leaves compared to cotton leaves seems to be due to a decreased compartmentalization of ions rather than to a difference in salt tolerance of the enzyme itself”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1167 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alteration of mineral nutrition under NaCl is not solely due to reduced growth, but a general process that impairs uptake of all minerals even at mild salinity.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
mild NaCl salinitye7
Outcome
uptake of all the mineralse7
Direction
impairse7

Verbatim

e0

“bean (Phaseolus vulgare L. cv Gabriella) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv Akala)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–306 · show in text ↑
e7

“alteration of mineral nutrition is not solely the reflection of a decreased growth rate, but also is a general process that impairs uptake of all the minerals even at mild NaCl salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1382 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

sodium chloride · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

12 papers: 0 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

salinity · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 1 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.