Paper · 2014 · Zhongguo shengtai nongye xuebao

Antagonistic effect of Mn and NaCl in irrigation water on cotton growth and yield

Xia Wang

12
claims
13
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The stresses of salinity and some trace elements along with the mutual relations on plant growth and yield have been well investigated and well documented in the literature. The combined effects of the two factors can be additive, antagonistic or synergistic. A soilless culture experiment was conducted to better understand the combined effects of manganese(Mn) and salinity(NaCl) on cotton growth and yield in a greenhouse at Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences. There were 30 orthogonal tests with six NaCl-levels and five Mn-levels in three random replicates. NaCl was added to solutions to create six NaCl-levels of concentration(0, 5 mmol·L?1, 15 mmol·L?1, 25 mmol·L?1, 35 mmol·L?1, 45 mmol·L?1) to form six electrical conductivities(EC)(2.36 dS·m?1, 2.90 dS·m?1, 3.95 dS·m?1, 5.04 dS·m?1, 6.11 dS·m?1, 7.17 dS·m?1, respectively). The Mn factor was at five levels where MnCl2 was added to solutions to create five Mn-levels of concentration(4.5 μmol·L?1, 9 μmol·L?1, 18 μmol·L?1, 36 μmol·L?1, 72 μmol·L?1). Cotton growth, yield, dry weight and element content were measured. The results showed that salinity inhibited cotton growth but promoted cotton yield when NaCl concentration increased from 15 mmol·L?1to 45 mmol·L?1. Cotton vegetative growth was at the best when NaCl concentration of irrigation water was 15?25 mmol·L?1. Dry weight of cotton roots and shoots decreased with increasing salinity as NaCl concentration of irrigation water increased from 25 mmol·L?1 to 45 mmol·L?1. The maximum growth and yield occurred when Mn concentration was 36 μmol·L?1. Mn and salinity had a significant impact on Na and Mn accumulation in cotton leaf. Salinity promoted Na accumulation but inhibited Mn accumulation in cotton leaves. The contents of Na decreased and Mn increased in cotton leaves when Mn concentration levels in irrigation water increased from 18 μmol·L?1to 72 μmol·L?1. In order to independently compare the effects of salinity and Mn on cotton, growth and yield of cotton were analyzed in a two-way ANOVA analysis using the MATLAB7.6.0.324(R2008a) software. The results showed that there were no significant influences of the interactions between salinity and Mn on cotton growth and yield. Thus the effects of the main treatments on cotton growth and yield could be presented and discussed independently. The Abbott equation was used to analyze the combined effects of Mn and salinity on cotton growth and yield and the results showed a negative relationship between Mn and salinity. In other words, the toxic effects on the growth and yield of cotton were less severe for combined Mn and salinity than the expected effects of the individual factors added together.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity inhibited cotton growth.

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
cotton growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
45 mmol·L?1e0
Comparator
15 mmol·L?1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity inhibited cotton growth but promoted cotton yield when NaCl concentration increased from 15 mmol·L?1to 45 mmol·L?1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing NaCl from 15 to 45 mmol·L?1 promoted cotton yield.

Treatment
NaCl concentration increased from 15 mmol·L?1to 45 mmol·L?1e0
Outcome
cotton yielde0
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
15 mmol·L?1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity inhibited cotton growth but promoted cotton yield when NaCl concentration increased from 15 mmol·L?1to 45 mmol·L?1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1244 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetative growth was best at 15?25 mmol·L?1 NaCl in irrigation water.

Treatment
NaCl concentration of irrigation water was 15?25 mmol·L?1e0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton vegetative growth was at the best when NaCl concentration of irrigation water was 15?25 mmol·L?1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1349 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root and shoot dry weight decreased as NaCl rose from 25 to 45 mmol·L?1.

Treatment
NaCl concentration of irrigation water increased from 25 mmol·L?1 to 45 mmol·L?1e0
Outcome
Dry weight of cotton roots and shootse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
25 mmol·L?1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry weight of cotton roots and shoots decreased with increasing salinity as NaCl concentration of irrigation water increased from 25 mmol·L?1 to 45 mmol·L?1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1507 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton growth and yield were maximal at 36 μmol·L?1 Mn.

Treatment
Mn concentration was 36 μmol·L?1e0
Outcome
maximum growth and yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum growth and yield occurred when Mn concentration was 36 μmol·L?1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1584 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mn and salinity significantly affected Na and Mn accumulation in cotton leaves.

Treatment
Mn and salinitye0
Outcome
Na and Mn accumulation in cotton leafe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mn and salinity had a significant impact on Na and Mn accumulation in cotton leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1586–1667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity promoted Na accumulation in cotton leaves.

Organ / stage
cotton leavese0
Treatment
Salinitye0
Outcome
Na accumulatione0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity promoted Na accumulation but inhibited Mn accumulation in cotton leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1669–1749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity inhibited Mn accumulation in cotton leaves.

Organ / stage
cotton leavese0
Treatment
Salinitye0
Outcome
Mn accumulatione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity promoted Na accumulation but inhibited Mn accumulation in cotton leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1669–1749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf Na content decreased as irrigation Mn rose from 18 to 72 μmol·L?1.

Treatment
Mn concentration levels in irrigation water increased from 18 μmol·L?1to 72 μmol·L?1e0
Outcome
contents of Nae0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
18 μmol·L?1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The contents of Na decreased and Mn increased in cotton leaves when Mn concentration levels in irrigation water increased from 18 μmol·L?1to 72 μmol·L?1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1751–1903 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf Mn content increased as irrigation Mn rose from 18 to 72 μmol·L?1.

Treatment
Mn concentration levels in irrigation water increased from 18 μmol·L?1to 72 μmol·L?1e0
Outcome
Mne0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
18 μmol·L?1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The contents of Na decreased and Mn increased in cotton leaves when Mn concentration levels in irrigation water increased from 18 μmol·L?1to 72 μmol·L?1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1751–1903 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity and Mn interaction did not significantly influence cotton growth and yield.

Treatment
interactions between salinity and Mne0
Outcome
cotton growth and yielde0
Direction
no significant influencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no significant influences of the interactions between salinity and Mn on cotton growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2118–2225 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Mn and salinity had less severe toxic effects on cotton growth and yield than the sum expected from each factor.

Treatment
combined Mn and salinitye0
Outcome
toxic effects on the growth and yield of cottone0
Direction
less severee0
Comparator
individual factors added togethere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the toxic effects on the growth and yield of cotton were less severe for combined Mn and salinity than the expected effects of the individual factors added together”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2537–2701 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

42 papers: 15 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

sodium chloride · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

manganese atom · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

salinity · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 5 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

salinity · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 16 positive, 92 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

irrigation · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 101 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.