Paper · 2007 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Influence of Calcium Silicate on Growth, Physiological Parameters and Mineral Nutrition in Two Legume Species Under Salt Stress

B. Murillo‐Amador; S. Yamada; T. Yamaguchi; et al.

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
135
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Cowpea and kidney bean plants were grown in a hydroponic system, and the effect of calcium silicate supplied to the nutrient solution under salt stress was investigated. The plants were subjected to four different treatments: (1) nutrient solution alone (C), (2) nutrient solution + 40 mmol l −1 NaCl (NaCl), (3) nutrient solution + 40 mmol l −1 NaCl + 0.5 mmol l −1 CaSiO 3 (NaCl + Si 1 ) and (4) nutrient solution + 40 mmol l −1 NaCl+1 mmol l −1 CaSiO 3 (NaCl + Si 2 ). The results showed that, in both species, salinity reduced all growth variables but silicate supplementation however partly overcame this growth reduction. Addition of silicate in NaCl‐stressed plants maintained membrane permeability. Net photosynthesis, chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance and transpiration were higher in plants under control treatment, and the inclusion of silicate in the nutrient solution resulted in a slight increase in these plant parameters. Intercellular CO 2 was slightly higher in plants under silicate treatment than in plants under control or NaCl treatment. Calcium concentration in shoots and roots in both species was slightly higher in the treatments where silicate was added. Potassium concentration for salt treatment was reduced in shoot and root of both species in the absence of silicate. Sodium and chloride concentration in shoots and roots in both species were slightly higher in the presence of NaCl and were slightly reduced in the plants under silicate treatments. The results suggest that, in hydroponically grown plants, the inclusion of silicate in the nutrient solution is beneficial because it improves growth, physiological parameters and may contribute to a more balanced nutrition by enhancing nutrient uptake under NaCl‐stressed conditions. Added calcium silicate may ameliorate the parameters affected by high salinity, may reduce sodium and chloride, and can slightly increase calcium and potassium concentrations in shoots and roots of salt‐stressed cowpea and kidney bean.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

salinity reduced growth variables in Cowpea.

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
growth variablese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity reduced all growth variables but silicate supplementation however partly overcame this growth reduction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea and kidney bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

silicate supplementation partly overcame growth variables in Cowpea.

Treatment
silicate supplementatione0
Outcome
growth variablese0
Direction
partly overcamee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity reduced all growth variables but silicate supplementation however partly overcame this growth reduction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea and kidney bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Addition of silicate maintained membrane permeability in Cowpea.

Treatment
Addition of silicatee0
Outcome
membrane permeabilitye0
Direction
maintainede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of silicate in NaCl‐stressed plants maintained membrane permeability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea and kidney bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

silicate treatment slightly higher Intercellular CO 2 in Cowpea.

Treatment
silicate treatmente0
Outcome
Intercellular CO 2e0
Direction
slightly highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercellular CO 2 was slightly higher in plants under silicate treatment than in plants under control or NaCl treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea and kidney bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

silicate slightly higher Calcium concentration in shoots and roots in Cowpea.

Treatment
silicatee0
Outcome
Calcium concentration in shoots and rootse0
Direction
slightly highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Calcium concentration in shoots and roots in both species was slightly higher in the treatments where silicate was added.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1198 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea and kidney bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

salt treatment reduced Potassium concentration in Cowpea.

Treatment
salt treatmente0
Outcome
Potassium concentratione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium concentration for salt treatment was reduced in shoot and root of both species in the absence of silicate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea and kidney bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

silicate treatments slightly reduced Sodium and chloride concentration in shoots and roots in Cowpea.

Treatment
silicate treatmentse0
Outcome
Sodium and chloride concentration in shoots and rootse0
Direction
slightly reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sodium and chloride concentration in shoots and roots in both species were slightly higher in the presence of NaCl and were slightly reduced in the plants under silicate treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1497 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea and kidney bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

inclusion of silicate slight increase Net photosynthesis, chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance in Cowpea.

Treatment
inclusion of silicatee0
Outcome
Net photosynthesis, chlorophyll content, stomatal conductancee0
Direction
slight increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net photosynthesis, chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance and transpiration were higher in plants under control treatment, and the inclusion of silicate in the nutrient solution resulted in a slight increase in these plant parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea and kidney bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

salinity reduced growth variables in kidney bean.

Taxon
kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
growth variablese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity reduced all growth variables but silicate supplementation however partly overcame this growth reduction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“kidney bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

silicate supplementation partly overcame growth variables in kidney bean.

Taxon
kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
silicate supplementatione0
Outcome
growth variablese0
Direction
partly overcamee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity reduced all growth variables but silicate supplementation however partly overcame this growth reduction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“kidney bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Addition of silicate maintained membrane permeability in kidney bean.

Taxon
kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
Addition of silicatee0
Outcome
membrane permeabilitye0
Direction
maintainede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of silicate in NaCl‐stressed plants maintained membrane permeability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“kidney bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

silicate treatment slightly higher Intercellular CO 2 in kidney bean.

Taxon
kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
silicate treatmente0
Outcome
Intercellular CO 2e0
Direction
slightly highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercellular CO 2 was slightly higher in plants under silicate treatment than in plants under control or NaCl treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“kidney bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

silicate slightly higher Calcium concentration in shoots and roots in kidney bean.

Taxon
kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
silicatee0
Outcome
Calcium concentration in shoots and rootse0
Direction
slightly highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Calcium concentration in shoots and roots in both species was slightly higher in the treatments where silicate was added.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1198 · show in text ↑
t0

“kidney bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

salt treatment reduced Potassium concentration in kidney bean.

Taxon
kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
salt treatmente0
Outcome
Potassium concentratione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium concentration for salt treatment was reduced in shoot and root of both species in the absence of silicate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“kidney bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

silicate treatments slightly reduced Sodium and chloride concentration in shoots and roots in kidney bean.

Taxon
kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
silicate treatmentse0
Outcome
Sodium and chloride concentration in shoots and rootse0
Direction
slightly reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sodium and chloride concentration in shoots and roots in both species were slightly higher in the presence of NaCl and were slightly reduced in the plants under silicate treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1497 · show in text ↑
t0

“kidney bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

inclusion of silicate slight increase Net photosynthesis, chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance in kidney bean.

Taxon
kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
inclusion of silicatee0
Outcome
Net photosynthesis, chlorophyll content, stomatal conductancee0
Direction
slight increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net photosynthesis, chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance and transpiration were higher in plants under control treatment, and the inclusion of silicate in the nutrient solution resulted in a slight increase in these plant parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“kidney bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–38 · show in text ↑

silicate(4-) · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silicate(4-) · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silicate(4-) · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

silicate(4-) · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

salinity · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

15 papers: 1 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

salinity · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

63 papers: 6 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

salinity · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

71 papers: 7 positive, 64 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

salinity · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 1 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.