Intervention effectmodel-written summary

N. salina extract up to 1.0% improved bean growth measures.

A claim from Impact of Chlorella vulgaris, Nannochloropsis salina, and Arthrospira platensis as bio-stimulants on common bean plant growth, yield and antioxidant capacity · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N. salina extract up to 1.0% improved bean growth measures.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
N. salinae0
Outcome
leaf area, and total fresh and dry weight per plante0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
up to 1.0%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of C. vulgaris , N. salina , and A. platensis extracts at concentrations up to 1.0% significantly improved various growth parameters, such as root, and shoot length, number of leaves and flowers per plant, leaf area, and total fresh and dry weight per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1277
t0

“common bean plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–125

Title

Impact of Chlorella vulgaris, Nannochloropsis salina, and Arthrospira platensis as bio-stimulants on common bean plant growth, yield and antioxidant capacity

Fatma Abd El Lateef Gharib; kholoud Osama; Amira Mohamed Abd El Sattar; et al. Scientific Reports 2024. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-50040-4

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-df4c5a2525cdf79bf632d500100e2e971ec0d9e1323f68794c61ed1fc6080a77 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

salinity · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

71 papers: 7 positive, 64 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 64 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.